FrankDrebin
Don't call me Shirley
Super player, tbf.
I needed to end on something controversial to justify my first line. But I'd far rather play with Bruno week to week than Gerrard. And Lampard is a whole other category.You'd have caught a lot of people with this one, if not for that last sentence.
Mind boggling stuff, this. The things you read on the internet sometimes, delightful.I needed to end on something controversial to justify my first line. But I'd far rather play with Bruno week to week than Gerrard. And Lampard is a whole other category.
Hello, El-Hadji.I needed to end on something controversial to justify my first line. But I'd far rather play with Bruno week to week than Gerrard. And Lampard is a whole other category.
Mind boggling stuff, this. The things you read on the internet sometimes, delightful.
You can't be serious.There's honestly not much in it between Gerrard and Bruno.
I do think Gerrard was better but the impact they have/had on their teams was quite similar. Both great cup players.
You can't be serious.
Gerrard dragged and inspired a totally mediocre Liverpool team to the CL final even when they were 3 nil down his body language never gave up and his goal started the comeback in the final.
Bruno's attitude and body language is horrendous and he'd been sulking and throwing his arms and hands about vs Olympiakos alone never mind the entire CL.
I'd just read this thread and what people who actually see him week by week are saying.
As a United fan, Gerrard was on a different planet to Bruno. Let's be real.Bruno has dragged a (relatively) shit Man United to wins many, many times.
Both of them have also cost their teams points because of their need to be the main man.
Like I said, Gerrard was better but not by much. Both are great "moments" players.
There is a case to be made for Salah though. He's still climbing our all time greats list and the top is not out of sight.
Gerrard dragged a totally forgettable Liverpool team being their star man to a CL trophy, from first the group game when they looked out and then the final.Bruno has dragged a (relatively) shit Man United to wins many, many times.
Both of them have also cost their teams points because of their need to be the main man.
Like I said, Gerrard was better but not by much. Both are great "moments" players.
Don't take the bait mate, he is clearly trollingGerrard dragged a totally forgettable Liverpool team being their star man to a CL trophy, from first the group game when they looked out and then the final.
What has Bruno done? A league cup? Which legendary games or run can he claim? They're not the same at all.
One is one of the greatest midfielders the league has seen and the other is someone with great ability but a terrible attitude as captain no less.
When your team is down and out and you need a leader with great footballing ability it'll always be Gerrard.
When your team is down and out and you need a leader with great footballing ability it'll always be Gerrard.
I am all for Anderson 4, Gerrard 0 (EPLs), but at least we should do it right. Evans is a three time EPL winner.1 time PL title winner Mo Salah. Same as Johnny Evans.
I was going to type out a big post to justify my stance, but thankfully I've been saved the need. He was genuinely world class for about 6 months under Benitez but aside from that I never got the hype.That's the thing though, Gerrard was part of the reason that Liverpool were in all those "down and out" positions that he had to try (and mostly fail to) save them from.
The famous "slippy G" game is a great example. Not because he slipped (it happens, all great players make mistakes) but because he spent the rest of the game trying hollywood passes and shots to try to be the hero, when if he'd just played normally Liverpool would probably have got something from the game.
This kind of thing makes for a great cup player, which Gerrard was and Bruno is.
And to get things back on topic for the thread; Salah > Gerrard > Bruno.
Literally no. He is the record holder for most goals scored against united.Another two years please Mo. Has there ever been a player that owns a club like he does to ETHs united?
Toure was great player, but he is not up there with the other three.No quarrel with those having Salah as the best African player of all time, but anyone doing that while writing off Drogba just doesn’t know football.
Drogba, Toure, Salah and Eto’o are the four. All had incredible careers with years at the top, were consistent, and pretty much won the lot. It’s semantics beyond that. Where you rate the leagues were when they played their best football etc.
Gullit?I don't think it's outrageous to rate him as the best Liverpool player of all time. He's different to Gerrard in terms of what he offers on the pitch but his output is difficult to ignore.
Another, just as interesting, question is is he the best player to play for Chelsea in Premier League history? That is the best player who has a) represented Chelsea and b) performed in the Premier League? Not necessarily the best based on his period at Chelsea.
The only one who bests him imo is De Bruyne, which is funny.
Toure was great player, but he is not up there with the other three.
That's the thing though, Gerrard was part of the reason that Liverpool were in all those "down and out" positions that he had to try (and mostly fail to) save them from.
The famous "slippy G" game is a great example. Not because he slipped (it happens, all great players make mistakes) but because he spent the rest of the game trying hollywood passes and shots to try to be the hero, when if he'd just played normally Liverpool would probably have got something from the game.
This kind of thing makes for a great cup player, which Gerrard was and Bruno is.
And to get things back on topic for the thread; Salah > Gerrard > Bruno.
Actually yes that's spot on. I didn't even think to consider pre-Abramovich but you can't argue against Gullit.Gullit?
Toure was great player, but he is not up there with the other three.
Hard to say really as so many different factors go in that assessment.Would Liverpool fans rate him as their best ever ?
Mane was also a big failure in the Bundesliga for Bayern.I had an awful opinion not long ago, that Mane was the better player and Liverpool were idiots to get rid of him. I couldn’t have been more wrong - as Salah is still doing it in the biggest league whilst Mane is playing in Saudi.
Salah really has been amazing for Liverpool. Year after year I thought he will stop dipping but it just hasn’t happened
Desailly is also worth a mentionActually yes that's spot on. I didn't even think to consider pre-Abramovich but you can't argue against Gullit.
I have been living in Africa for more than a decade, unless you're Egyptian, no one considers him the best ever African player.Strongly disagree. Of course he's the player who can and should contribute by far the most for Egypt, but no player can do it all on their own. It's not like international football is the best indicator of anything in the modern era, either.
By the way, would Messi not be the greatest ever in your eyes, if they lost the shootout vs France?
I never really saw Weah either, so can't comment on him.
For me, Drogba isn't a contender. I'd confidently put Eto'o and Touré above him, and I personally don't think even them two are good enough to be picked over Salah.
Yes mate, your last line I agree with.That's the thing though, Gerrard was part of the reason that Liverpool were in all those "down and out" positions that he had to try (and mostly fail to) save them from.
The famous "slippy G" game is a great example. Not because he slipped (it happens, all great players make mistakes) but because he spent the rest of the game trying hollywood passes and shots to try to be the hero, when if he'd just played normally Liverpool would probably have got something from the game.
This kind of thing makes for a great cup player, which Gerrard was and Bruno is.
And to get things back on topic for the thread; Salah > Gerrard > Bruno.
Mane over Drogba and when you factor in success at international level Eto'o stands alone still. I think Salah is the best in terms of peak performance at club level.Drogba, Toure, Salah and Eto’o are the four. All had incredible careers with years at the top, were consistent, and pretty much won the lot. It’s semantics beyond that. Where you rate the leagues were when they played their best football etc.
Agree with all of that.He's quite clearly Liverpool's best since Dalglish with the exception of 13/14 Suarez
Mane over Drogba and when you factor in success at international level Eto'o stands alone still. I think Salah is the best in terms of peak performance at club level.
He's quite clearly Liverpool's best since Dalglish with the exception of 13/14 Suarez
Agree with this. Best I’ve seen ever seen aside from Suarez in 13/14. Him Alisson and VVD are some of the best to ever do it for us in their positions. It’s just unfortunate (fortunate for everyone else mind) that a few of the margins didn’t go our way. 18/19 and 21/22 and the CL finals or they’d have a few more major honours which their talent level deserves. It’s what happens when you compete with Madrid Juju and Pep.Amazing player. Best right winger in the premier league era. Better career at the club and obviously won more trophies. But I would take prime Luis Suarez over prime Salah 100 times out of 100.