Very weird signing and that too for an insane amount. The fact that he is looking to make him a xhaka replacement makes it even more weird.Hope he won't be another managerial casuality of generational talent havertz. .
Very weird signing and that too for an insane amount. The fact that he is looking to make him a xhaka replacement makes it even more weird.Hope he won't be another managerial casuality of generational talent havertz. .
Probably the thought process behind this signing may be having rice allow them to play aggressive two cams in Odegaard and havertz.Very weird signing and that too for an insane amount. The fact that he is looking to make him a xhaka replacement makes it even more weird.
If I’m honest, I was delighted to hear Arsenal signing him and for such a large amount of money too.Hope he won't be another managerial casuality of generational talent havertz. .
Rice is a ball winner but he almost always had Soucek or Philips next to him. He would be better playing with Xhaka than replacing him.Probably the thought process behind this signing may be having rice allow them to play aggressive two cams in Odegaard and havertz.
But Rice didnt play the role of cdm in a possession oriented dominant team. He always had players along side him and behind him to give protection in west ham and England team. At arsenal with havertz and Odegaard with high line defenders I don't think he will get much protection.
May be I am wrong and rice can give enough protection for arsenal. But it's new to him and not much quick to do all on his own.
Why would anyone want a manager that's likeable to opposition fans? No opposition fan should like any rival manager ffs.
Not surprising, given you use the term 'low key'.Low-key I am absolute puzzled why so many of you are so salty towards Arteta? He seems such a nice dude and I like his approach.
Why would anyone want a manager that's likeable to opposition fans? No opposition fan should like any rival manager ffs.
What? Since when?Klopp’s a very likeable guy.
What? Since when?
He’s an absolute cnut 99% of the time.Since covid, when he was excellent talking about the pandemic. Plus in general he seems like fairly smart and interesting dude.
Out of interest, what is Mr Lego doing in that documentary?Have you ever seen him on the sideline? Or the absolute cringefest from that Amazon documentary?
I don't know I just feel like you guys didn't need to go out and spend huge amounts on players, although I do think Rice is going to be fantastic for you. The strategy seemed to have been working but I don't pay enough attention to Arsenal to know if that was truly the case or not. The Havertz one though I will never understand.Because the stakes are higher now being back in CL. Arteta built a very good first XI whose lack of depth and experience inevitably cost us the title. He's fattened up the squad and brought in 3 mature and experienced, though still relatively young, players.
I do wonder how Havertz will turn out, his signing (esp for that price) is bemusing. Doesn't seem a proper replacement for Xhaka at all.
Klopp definitely isn't likeable. He's a caricature who only shows his happy go lucky side when it suits him. Most of the time he's a miserable prick who jumps down journalists' throats if they dare to question him.Klopp’s a very likeable guy. And I cannot fecking stand Liverpool. Wenger always seemed like a decent sort too.
I'm sure if the players we wanted were available for cheaper, Arteta would have gone that route. Also, the market has inflated hugely (just like everything else) in the past 2 years. In the past Arteta has taken chances on relatively cheaper options (eg Vieira for £35mil, Lokonga for £15mil) that haven't worked out, though looks like he hasn't given up on Vieira yet. He's gone with experiened but still young players in Havertz and Rice, who are already in PL. Much less risky than taking on youngsters from lower tier leaguess, so you inevitably pay for that. We also didn't previously have the funds to spend like this due to being out of CL for so long and a high wage bill. We got that under control and now that we're back in CL, can allow to loosen the purse strings as our revenue will go up. Inevitably, our wage bill will go up too, but it will be in line with a CL club.I don't know I just feel like you guys didn't need to go out and spend huge amounts on players, although I do think Rice is going to be fantastic for you. The strategy seemed to have been working but I don't pay enough attention to Arsenal to know if that was truly the case or not. The Havertz one though I will never understand.
Klopp’s a very likeable guy. And I cannot fecking stand Liverpool. Wenger always seemed like a decent sort too.
But surely the worry is if this season was a flash in the pan or a genuine evolutionary step. I think Rice is going to be a fantastic buy for you lot though. I suppose you guys may have just gotten lucky with the signings of Odegaard, Partey, Tomiyasu, Gabriel, etc where they were all under 50 million. I just figured that was the budget you guys were going for, similar to how City were for years where that seemed the max they would pay for a player. You think the pressure is going to be on Arteta this season to win some silverware? Will he be sacked if you guys falter in the league?I'm sure if the players we wanted were available for cheaper, Arteta would have gone that route. Also, the market has inflated hugely (just like everything else) in the past 2 years. In the past Arteta has taken chances on relatively cheaper options (eg Vieira for £35mil, Lokonga for £15mil) that haven't worked out, though looks like he hasn't given up on Vieira yet. He's gone with experiened but still young players in Havertz and Rice, who are already in PL. Much less risky than taking on youngsters from lower tier leaguess, so you inevitably pay for that. We also didn't previously have the funds to spend like this due to being out of CL for so long and a high wage bill. We got that under control and now that we're back in CL, can allow to loosen the purse strings as our revenue will go up. Inevitably, our wage bill will go up too, but it will be in line with a CL club.
There's always that worry but it's good to know the club/owners are continuing to build/improve the team. If we made no significant signings then we probably can't expect to do any better than last season. In fact, you'd probably expect to do worse as we have CL to contend with now. It was clear that our biggest issues last season were lack of depth and experience - I think our squad (at least on paper) has improved in both regards. I feel we probably have to properly address Xhaka's departure though.But surely the worry is if this season was a flash in the pan or a genuine evolutionary step. I think Rice is going to be a fantastic buy for you lot though. I suppose you guys may have just gotten lucky with the signings of Odegaard, Partey, Tomiyasu, Gabriel, etc where they were all under 50 million. I just figured that was the budget you guys were going for, similar to how City were for years where that seemed the max they would pay for a player. You think the pressure is going to be on Arteta this season to win some silverware? Will he be sacked if you guys falter in the league?
But surely the worry is if this season was a flash in the pan or a genuine evolutionary step. I think Rice is going to be a fantastic buy for you lot though. I suppose you guys may have just gotten lucky with the signings of Odegaard, Partey, Tomiyasu, Gabriel, etc where they were all under 50 million. I just figured that was the budget you guys were going for, similar to how City were for years where that seemed the max they would pay for a player. You think the pressure is going to be on Arteta this season to win some silverware? Will he be sacked if you guys falter in the league?
How do you have a flukey season, pray tell?Definitely a flukey season in that so many other clubs (Liverpool, Chelsea, United) were in transition. Arsenal's xPts had them about 20 behind where they finished up. It's unlikely those two things reoccur. Top four and a decent account in UCL would be success for Arteta this year after not being consistently a European competitor for so long. Putting themselves in the mix with City, Liverpool, Chelsea and United is progress.
Definitely a flukey season in that so many other clubs (Liverpool, Chelsea, United) were in transition. Arsenal's xPts had them about 20 behind where they finished up. It's unlikely those two things reoccur. Top four and a decent account in UCL would be success for Arteta this year after not being consistently a European competitor for so long. Putting themselves in the mix with City, Liverpool, Chelsea and United is progress.
No CL, no major injuries until the end of the season, early exits on cup competitions, undeserved late injury time winners, Haaland needing time to gel with the squad, Partey being available for selection, World Cup winter break.How do you have a flukey season, pray tell?
No CL, no major injuries until the end of the season, early exits on cup competitions, undeserved late injury time winners, Haaland needing time to gel with the squad, Partey being available for selection, World Cup winter break.
How do you have a flukey season, pray tell?
Finishing second in a season you would typically finish 4/5th in.
Finishing second in a season you would typically finish 4/5th in.
I mean it was a flukey season, surely even Arsenal fans can't dispute that? Lots more time to train and recover than most of their direct competitors, lot less games, in what was a gruelling, one of a kind season. It's ok to recognise that - it's called having a brain.
Nah you're right you were great. You'll finish at worst second next season, will probably win the league after thrashing an up-for-it City in a super competitive Cup final.Getting 84 points usually has you finishing 4th or 5th?
Why is getting knocked out the cup competitions 'flukey' though?
Are we meant to say Man Utd were flukey that they got knocked out the Europa League?
We played less games than Utd and City, did we play a lot less than Liverpool, Newcastle, Chelsea, Spurs etc? They were all flukey that they were mostly poor in the cup competitions?
Nah you're right you were great. You'll finish at worst second next season, will probably win the league after thrashing an up-for-it City in a super competitive Cup final.
What you and your fellow Arsenal fans are saying is mostly nonsense. You get super defensive about anything that is levelled at the team, and are incapable of seeing how much of an advantage your lads and Arteta had with recuperation. It wasn't even just about the gross amount of games (though it was a big factor), it was about the space between games at a key time during the season, allowing you to train and work tactically rather barely recuperate before the next 90mn. It's a boring conversation, it's absolutely blatant to see (it was obvious at the time and it's as clear in retrospect), and this insecurity that anything negative said about your team needs to be discussed to no end as if it negates any successes the team has had, is frankly tiring.See, that's a massive jump from what I said. I didn't say anything about how we will do next season. I'm merely asking how our previous season was deemed flukey and got some weird reasons.
What you and your fellow Arsenal fans are saying is mostly nonsense. You get super defensive about anything that is levelled at the team, and are incapable of seeing how much of an advantage your lads and Arteta had with recuperation. It wasn't even just about the gross amount of games (though it was a big factor), it was about the space between games at a key time during the season, allowing you to train and work tactically rather barely recuperate before the next 90mn. It's a boring conversation, it's absolutely blatant to see (it was obvious at the time and it's as clear in retrospect), and this insecurity that anything negative said about your team needs to be discussed to no end as if it negates any successes the team has had, is frankly tiring.
You played some good football for large parts of the season, you have some young exciting talents, but yeah you had a flukey season that enabled you to finish second. So what?
You choked for certain games at the tail end of the season, because of mentality issues. It still doesn't change that overall you had a much easier schedule than everyone else - had it been similar to others, you just would've likely crumbled even more. The first half of the season also had some very flukey results with last minute winners in games where you barely deserved a draw, and you were massively outperforming all your underlying stats - which wasn't going to last either.Yet our best form of the season was when we had Europa League games, and our worst form was when we were out all the competitions, so not sure how that argument holds sway?
We get super defensive because the points we hear don't make sense, that's all.