Michael Oliver

They talked about it on Sky and they didn't reckon it was a sending off.

in the same breath as saying hes the best referee in england. How many times this season has he made a shocker? Last season? The correct analysis is to wonder whats going on with Michael Oliver and if he needs a break. He should be getting slaughtered for that call, when in the same game he let Nunez take the piss out of him and his officials.
 
Some Michael Oliver Stats


United have 18 wins from 45 matches reffed by Oliver.

They have 5 red cards and 92 yellows.

In the same time, hes shown our opponents 1 red card and 62 yellows.

Are we that much dirtier?

By contrast, hes reffed Liverpool 60 times (thats 16 times more) and shown them just 1 red. City 53 times and shown them 1 red.
So we get a red card, once every 9 games with Oliver. For Liverpool its once every 60 and for city its once every 53. For opponents against us, its once every 45 games.

This season, he decided to let Romero's blatant handball go by, and send Dalot off for nothing.

Like Anthony Taylor, there just seems to be a genuine bias at best, and something corrupt at worst.
 
I was trying to remember a similar incident to this recently, someone referenced Martinelli but that wasn't this season was it?

Watching the Brighton game and immediately thought of it, Lewis Dunk away to Nottingham Forest three weeks ago.

He got two yellows in one action for dissent after the penalty was given.

Yellow would've been enough though for what Dalot did especially as it was right at the end of the game.
 
I was trying to remember a similar incident to this recently, someone referenced Martinelli but that wasn't this season was it?

Watching the Brighton game and immediately thought of it, Lewis Dunk away to Nottingham Forest three weeks ago.

He got two yellows in one action for dissent after the penalty was given.

Yellow would've been enough though for what Dalot did especially as it was right at the end of the game.

Wasn't Dunk straight red on the second one for calling him a knob head?
 
Wasn't Dunk straight red on the second one for calling him a knob head?

From what I remember he was booked for protesting the penalty award and then may have deemed touching the ref aswell when he didn't move away so can't remember if that was second yellow. He's been back playing a few weeks so it wasn't a violent conduct red card.
 
He officially changed his name to Moron Oliver after Dalot's red. Thank God it was the end of the game and didn't end up being consequential but the call could not have been more ridiculous
 
From what I remember he was booked for protesting the penalty award and then may have deemed touching the ref aswell when he didn't move away so can't remember if that was second yellow. He's been back playing a few weeks so it wasn't a violent conduct red card.
Yellow. Then a Straight red for what he called him.
 
Booking a player for dissent is within a referee's right. If they happen to immediately dissent against then the player is to blame if that referee decides to take the same action.

The problem, as always, is that this hardline approach to enforcing the rules will be quickly forgotten about now. We won't see another similar sending off this season and there will plenty of other players that have the same reaction to a decision that Dalot had and will escape without being booked.

It's like before taking charge of our matches referees will spin a wheel that randomly decides which rule they'll be taking a no-nonsense approach to that day.
 
Booking a player for dissent is within a referee's right. If they happen to immediately dissent against then the player is to blame if that referee decides to take the same action.

The problem, as always, is that this hardline approach to enforcing the rules will be quickly forgotten about now. We won't see another similar sending off this season and there will plenty of other players that have the same reaction to a decision that Dalot had and will escape without being booked.

It's like before taking charge of our matches referees will spin a wheel that randomly decides which rule they'll be taking a no-nonsense approach to that day.

How about make the right decision in the first place, and accept that if you are incompetent you can go feck off with your fragile feelings when people complain.
 
Booking a player for dissent is within a referee's right. If they happen to immediately dissent against then the player is to blame if that referee decides to take the same action.
There was no second dissent. Let us not start this narrative.
 
The only other time I've seen a ref give two yellow cards to a player for continued dissent was Anthony Taylor to Vidal in a CL game during lockdown. I remember thinking at the time that it was a rare occurrence, however Vidal squared up to the ref in a threatening manner. That's not what happened with Dalot.

 
Will preface this by saying I don't think what Dalot did warranted a sending off but do feel like Utd fans are seeing what they want to see here.

Oliver gives the throw to Liverpool. Dalot throws a strop. Oliver books him and Dalot throws another strop. Two separate acts of dissent. Red card.

Now what should have happened is that Oliver should have been a grown up and told Dalot to calm down rather than dishing out the 2nd yellow. Plus, yes, what Nunez did was worse and by the same token should have received at best the same punishment.
The second yellow was part of the same strop.
 
Watched MOTD and they didn’t discuss the red. This is why the manager has to give a proper answer to the question and make it a talking point. You can’t just let it go
 
Watched MOTD and they didn’t discuss the red. This is why the manager has to give a proper answer to the question and make it a talking point. You can’t just let it go
I'd agree with you in theory however I think Ten Hag is picking the right moments to kick up a fuss, for example after Casemiro's red vs Southampton he spoke out about how it was a poor decision. Whereas a 94th minute red didn't influence the result of the game.
 
I'd agree with you in theory however I think Ten Hag is picking the right moments to kick up a fuss, for example after Casemiro's red vs Southampton he spoke out about how it was a poor decision. Whereas a 94th minute red didn't influence the result of the game.

Surely, you have to be consistent with expressing your views, whether win, lose or draw.
 
Surely, you have to be consistent with expressing your views, whether win, lose or draw.
Look at the way Klopp regularly complains about the officials post match and comes across as a whingy shithead. Ten Hag doesn't have the credit in the bank that Klopp has, so I think he'd be in danger of coming across as an unlikeable bloke if he whinged about every poor decision that went against us. In press conferences you've got to 'play the game' - pick the right moments to dig out the ref, so that the media sits up and take notice. I don't think a 94th minute red was the right moment to kick up a fuss (even though it was a poor decision).
 
Looking forward to that goblin Gallagher saying it was a clear red tomorrow the absolute slothfaced feck.
"It's Dalot's fault for reacting immediately, and not taking a second to think." Or something similar. Which is funny because that's clearly what Oliver does as well, and Oliver hasn't just had a incorrect decision called against him moments before.
 
Look at the way Klopp regularly complains about the officials post match and comes across as a whingy shithead. Ten Hag doesn't have the credit in the bank that Klopp has, so I think he'd be in danger of coming across as an unlikeable bloke if he whinged about every poor decision that went against us. In press conferences you've got to 'play the game' - pick the right moments to dig out the ref, so that the media sits up and take notice. I don't think a 94th minute red was the right moment to kick up a fuss (even though it was a poor decision).

Nah who cares about appearing whingy. Klopp acting like a wanker is the reason they get favourable decisions. ETH has to make every decision that goes against us a big deal. I am so sick that Oliver can just be an idiot and get away with it
 
Look at the way Klopp regularly complains about the officials post match and comes across as a whingy shithead. Ten Hag doesn't have the credit in the bank that Klopp has, so I think he'd be in danger of coming across as an unlikeable bloke if he whinged about every poor decision that went against us. In press conferences you've got to 'play the game' - pick the right moments to dig out the ref, so that the media sits up and take notice. I don't think a 94th minute red was the right moment to kick up a fuss (even though it was a poor decision).
I think you're absolutely right. We don't benefit from whinging about this decision. All that would happen is that Ten Hag would get fined and nothing else would come of it. It's not even the most scandalous decision this season and look where complaining has gotten us before - nowhere. We all know this.

On the other hand I will happily moan on this forum about Oliver being a massive fecking twat. Because we also all know this
 
Nah who cares about appearing whingy. Klopp acting like a wanker is the reason they get favourable decisions. ETH has to make every decision that goes against us a big deal. I am so sick that Oliver can just be an idiot and get away with it
Klopp has the success in England to get away with those type of comments. And because Man United aren't the media darlings like Liverpool, if Ten Hag starts complaining about every poor refereeing the decision, the media narrative will be "stop shifting the blame. You've spent hundreds of millions on transfers and you're sat in 7th".
 
Will preface this by saying I don't think what Dalot did warranted a sending off but do feel like Utd fans are seeing what they want to see here.

Oliver gives the throw to Liverpool. Dalot throws a strop. Oliver books him and Dalot throws another strop. Two separate acts of dissent. Red card.

Now what should have happened is that Oliver should have been a grown up and told Dalot to calm down rather than dishing out the 2nd yellow. Plus, yes, what Nunez did was worse and by the same token should have received at best the same punishment.
He didn't throw his 2nd strop after the yellow though. Watch the footage again in this thread.
 
Some Michael Oliver Stats


United have 18 wins from 45 matches reffed by Oliver.

They have 5 red cards and 92 yellows.

In the same time, hes shown our opponents 1 red card and 62 yellows.

Are we that much dirtier?

By contrast, hes reffed Liverpool 60 times (thats 16 times more) and shown them just 1 red. City 53 times and shown them 1 red.
So we get a red card, once every 9 games with Oliver. For Liverpool its once every 60 and for city its once every 53. For opponents against us, its once every 45 games.

This season, he decided to let Romero's blatant handball go by, and send Dalot off for nothing.

Like Anthony Taylor, there just seems to be a genuine bias at best, and something corrupt at worst.

He still blames us for Kevin Keegan and Newcastle bottling the title all those years ago.
 
The first part would only make sense if referees always applied the laws to the letter. In that case football would be very, vert different.

In the context of how referees manage games, two yellows was utterly baffling. I initially thought Dalot been booked before.

Even a yellow is harsh for dissent here, given the game and circumstances. Two is ludicrous.

Agree with you - it was ridiculous. But it was one of those where - if you ready the rulebook word by word without any kind of understanding for people or context - you can probably interpret it as a correct decision.
 
Agree with you - it was ridiculous. But it was one of those where - if you ready the rulebook word by word without any kind of understanding for people or context - you can probably interpret it as a correct decision.

Shame he forgot to book Salah for waving an imaginary yellow card in the same situation, considering he's reading the rulebook word by word.
 
I actually wonder if any United supporters have actually read the Law Book. Dalot’s reaction is a text book example of dissent, that he then does it again after getting the yellow. He played five minutes of extra time, adding an extra minute from the four that was posted

Am I happy with the two yellows, no but by the law book they weee justified.

When Ref to us, refer to the law book.
When Ref to Other top team, refer to discretion.
Those law book fouls were happened again and again against us this season, and no foul for other top teams (We have no benefit except Wolves match in day one)

Refer to law book, how many cards should give to Nunez in first half?
 
Will preface this by saying I don't think what Dalot did warranted a sending off but do feel like Utd fans are seeing what they want to see here.

Oliver gives the throw to Liverpool. Dalot throws a strop. Oliver books him and Dalot throws another strop. Two separate acts of dissent. Red card.

Now what should have happened is that Oliver should have been a grown up and told Dalot to calm down rather than dishing out the 2nd yellow. Plus, yes, what Nunez did was worse and by the same token should have received at best the same punishment.
Your argument falls on the fact that by the time Oliver walks up to him and gives him the second yellow Dalot’s already calmed down, turned away from Oliver and is recovering from the run.

If flailing your arms twice (the last of which happens as you’re being shown a yellow card) is two separate counts of dissent worthy of two yellows then surely every verbal protest that consists of more than one sentence should be punished with two yellows.
 
Agree with you - it was ridiculous. But it was one of those where - if you ready the rulebook word by word without any kind of understanding for people or context - you can probably interpret it as a correct decision.

Working to rule, it would be funny to see a ref using the rulebook word for word for a game. Suffice it to say, that ref would never appear again in the football league, but it would be fun to watch.

What was an interesting highlighting of it, was when Darwin earned himself three (or four) yellows in the space of five seconds, and everybody said, yea yea, but you juat don’t give more than one in a situation like that. Of course, if the VAR ref knew what Oliver was going to do later, he would have to call him to the screen to watch Nunez’ kicking of the ball after the whistle, verbal protest, ironical applaud and ironical thumbs up. Maybe he would have received two reds, is that possible?
 
Some Michael Oliver Stats


United have 18 wins from 45 matches reffed by Oliver.

They have 5 red cards and 92 yellows.

In the same time, hes shown our opponents 1 red card and 62 yellows.

Are we that much dirtier?

By contrast, hes reffed Liverpool 60 times (thats 16 times more) and shown them just 1 red. City 53 times and shown them 1 red.
So we get a red card, once every 9 games with Oliver. For Liverpool its once every 60 and for city its once every 53. For opponents against us, its once every 45 games.

This season, he decided to let Romero's blatant handball go by, and send Dalot off for nothing.

Like Anthony Taylor, there just seems to be a genuine bias at best, and something corrupt at worst.

This is spot on.
Was it counted when he sat in the VAR room?
 
Some Michael Oliver Stats


United have 18 wins from 45 matches reffed by Oliver.

They have 5 red cards and 92 yellows.

In the same time, hes shown our opponents 1 red card and 62 yellows.

Are we that much dirtier?

By contrast, hes reffed Liverpool 60 times (thats 16 times more) and shown them just 1 red. City 53 times and shown them 1 red.
So we get a red card, once every 9 games with Oliver. For Liverpool its once every 60 and for city its once every 53. For opponents against us, its once every 45 games.

This season, he decided to let Romero's blatant handball go by, and send Dalot off for nothing.

Like Anthony Taylor, there just seems to be a genuine bias at best, and something corrupt at worst.

I know we're being mad at him and all, and rightly so, because it was a shit decision, but your post is a bit selective, innit?
You make it seem like United is the only outlier. Oliver gives a red cards once every 9 games to United, as you say, but it's not like United is the only team getting red cards with that sort of frequency from Oliver.

11.66 — Aston Villa
10.75 — Leicester City
9.60 — Spurs
9.16 — Arsenal
9.16 — Everton
9.00 — Man Utd
8.66 — Burnley
3.75 — Huddersfield (only 15 games, 4 reds, wonder what they did to him)
 
Just saw something funny - i accidentally watched highlights from OGS' first game in charge against Cardiff. Rashford is defending a set-piece and used his breast / shoulder to take the ball away from danger - clearly no handball. Penalty is given - guess who the ref in that game was haha :)