Bole Top
Full Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2014
- Messages
- 4,095
it's interesting how frequently is mentioned that Messi's teammates are much better than Ronaldo's, yet the fact that Ronaldo has worked under much better managers is always ignored.
On seventies teams attacked probably more than now. Eighties and nineties were more defensive but seventies were on pair with now. Fifties and Sixties were far more attacking.You make it sound a bit like Cristiano Ronaldo is some mythical embodiment of goalscoring the likes of which the world has never seen but is it really like that? My casual impression is that he is setting these records, in the era with the most goals, with the harshest refereeing, (best pitches/equipment etc) in a great Madrid side that often enjoys a sizeable advantage in quality over lesser sides in La Liga. He's had both top teams geared to give him the most freedom and takes full advantage of having 7-8 shots a game.
Even though I'd agree that his longevity and consistency in output is super impressive, it's in the era where players are generally most professional about how they manage their fitness and sports science/training is at its highest. imo Cristiano Ronaldo is this generation's greatest incarnation of the complete forward, but he drops to the periphery too much when I watch him in big games for me to say he's more special than that.
The fact he's never come remotely close to repeating the feat seems to indicate an in form year.
Subjective. I find it pretty pathetic and something that wouldn't look out of place on the god awful YouTube comment sections.
The greatest in form year in the history of the game, by the current best player in the world and winner of the most ballon d'or awards in history .
The fact Ronaldo wasn't able to beat this record of messis suggests he's never had as much of an in form year . Which means messis in form year is better than anything Ronaldo has ever done over the course of 365 days .
it's interesting how frequently is mentioned that Messi's teammates are much better than Ronaldo's, yet the fact that Ronaldo has worked under much better managers is always ignored.
Mindlessly supports their player no matter what, chosing to ignore the obvious. We had Kagawa fanboys on here for example.
Current? I wouldn't even have him in the top 3 for 2016.The greatest in form year in the history of the game, by the current best player in the world and winner of the most ballon d'or awards in history .
The fact Ronaldo wasn't able to beat this record of messis suggests he's never had as much of an in form year . Which means messis in form year is better than anything Ronaldo has ever done over the course of 365 days .
Current? I wouldn't even have him in the top 3 for 2016.
Yet Ronaldo has consistently outscored him for a few years...
The goalscoring part is in a short paragraph because it's only one aspect of attacking play. And before you envision me as some sort of overblown critic - keep in mind that I still rank him among the top 10 (just not in the Cruyff tier - who is the best European footballer of all time with Beckenbauer) and have defended Ronaldo in the past. Wrt this thread, I could've also dedicated separate paragraphs to Cruyff's superior dribbling skills (which were a shade below Maradona/Messi), his imagination (which ranks in the top tier of European players), his ball skills (again, just a step below Maradona/Messi), the variety in his game (again, GOAT tier for European footballers), the fact that he was one of the pioneers of the False 9 position (which is much harder to play than charging up the left flank - given that Cruyff was the first line of offense and defense - the architect, and the finisher) - but didn't, because they're individual aspects.
People can harp on Ronaldo's goalscoring record as much as they want, but not only did the game of Cruyff or Platini or Maradona transcend 50+ goal stats - it's only one category for judging footballers. Infact, IMO, United Ronaldo was a much better footballer than the Real version - who puts up crazy goal stats but is a worse overall player. He could go on crazy dribble runs, slice up defenses on his own, try something different every game, maintain a balance between scoring and setting up countless chances for his team-mates. Might just be me, but if he had maintained that sort of level, I'd have judged him to be a better footballer than I do currently - because now, his game is significant reduced - which is a pity because there was a time when he had everyone on the edge of their seats - like a magician, of sorts.
The European Cup being easier to win than the Champions League is up to interpretation, and again, I've not left it out on a convenience basis, despite what you think. When Cruyff reached his first European Cup final, he had to beat a Benfica team with Eusébio, Coluna, Simoes and co. And had to face a Milan team with Rivera (eventual Ballon D'Or winner), Hamrin, Schnellinger, Prati, Rosato, etc etc in the final. And he had to beat out a Feyenoord team with Van Hanegem, Mouljin, Israël, Kidval, Jansen domestically (who won the European Cup the next season vs Jock Stein's Celtic) - before even qualifying for the European Cup. Over the next 3 seasons, he had to beat that Celtic team, Internazionale, Bayern Munich, Benfica (again), Arsenal, Atlético - whilst winning domestically, and facing the likes of Beckenbauer, Facchetti, Burgnich, Breitner, Coelho, Müller, Eusébio, Mazzola, Dalgligh, Coluna, Johnstone, Simoes, Jair, Hoeneß in the Cup. Ajax didn't just waltz into the final, and beat whoever, whenever. The qualification itself was harder given that Top 4 teams weren't guaranteed a spot.
eg. Watch this game where Ajax lost. Cruyff was the biggest presence outside of Rivera (instead of being marginal for 85 minutes, and scoring a goal to get on the stat-sheet):
If we put the old European Cup rules in current football, Ronaldo would've probably participated in 1 European Cup campaign since joining Madrid (including missing out on the seasons where they eventually won - because they weren't domestic champions). How good would the aggregate goal records look then? Yes, he was facing Messi's Barcelona, but that's part of the era based context, and why transposing rules from era to another is much more complex than simply - The European Cup was easy back then.
Also consider where Ajax started when Cruyff made his debut. He didn't walk into a United team where Fergie was already one of the Top 3 managers of all time, or a Madrid team that spent the highest amount of money in one transfer window in history. Cruyff built Ajax with Michels, and then smashed Europe - including the climb from the relegation zone when Michels took over, to then competing domestically, then reaching the final vs Rivera, and then beating everyone in their path - with Cruyff as the crown jewel - a player who scored with aplomb, controlled the game, defended - played all over the place, and was their spiritual focal point.
PS: Again, the post might seem overly critical, however I'm not denying that Ronaldo is a great, great player - one of the Top 10 football has ever seen. Because there's more to football than goals, and from that standpoint - Ronaldo does not have a case against the likes of Cruyff or Beckenbauer. His game is simply too condensed since joining Madrid (and the last part of his United career) to be considered in the same light as those two, among others.
The Ballon D'or indicates he was the best player in the world in 2015.Remind me who won the last ballon d'or? He's the current best player in the world . You've used that argument with Ronaldo before.
The Ballon D'or indicates he was the best player in the world in 2015.
I think that some of Messi skills have been mythologized in some God-like level. Like:
- he's the best passer of all time. Sorry, but that is bullshit. Even in my lifetime, I would put Riquelme easily ahead of him. Laudrup too. Who knows for other eras, but Maradona looked every bit as good (if not better) than Messi on him.
- he's the best playmaker of all time or some other nonsense. Xavi was far far better than him on it. He averaged 100+ passes, with 94% accuracy or so over the course of seasons. Add to that, he made a significant defensive contribution, which helped Barca get the ball back and start new actions. Messi doesn't even bother on doing that. The only thing on playmaking skills he has on Xavi is the final ball. I would add Pirlo and Scholes as two other players who controlled the matches better than Messi. Sure, completely other positions, but still, if you count him as playmaker, then they were better than him on that.
- best dribbler of all time. I think that the other Argie was better than Messi on it, though it comes close. Cruyff and Best were also as good as Messi on dribbling.
Now, what makes Messi unique, is that he had all these skills (a great passer, a great playmaker, and one of the top dribblers of all time) in addition to being one of the best goalscorers of all time (likely in top 3 together with Pele and C. Ronaldo). However, it needs to be said that when Messi started getting concentrated more on playmaking, then his end-product declined (which is to be expected), so for most part it was either a to goalscorer with a very good all round play, or a player with top all round play while being a very good goalscorer.
Still, that is more than probably anyone bar Pele. He has so much points on favor of him, without the need of adding things.
Messi is better at making the final pass. Xavi was better at controlling the match, and basically a team with Xavi had always the ball.Xavi's passing accuracy . Of that 94%, I bet you 80+% of them were sideways . Messi is a far superior playmaker than Xavi
I'm not ignoring league titles. Messi has won La Liga. Ronaldo has also won La Liga and he has won the premier league. Like I said Ronaldo has won everything Messi has. Messi has not won everything Ronaldo has.Why are you ignoring league titles? It's more difficult to win a competition over 38 games rather than a cup competition.
5 actually and this is my last. Fun while it lastedYou should really stop wasting your 10 posts per day cheap dig
I'm not ignoring league titles. Messi has won La Liga. Ronaldo has also won La Liga and he has won the premier league. Like I said Ronaldo has won everything Messi has. Messi has not won everything Ronaldo has.
~20 assists in 09/10 for Barcelona and Spain according to transfermarkt and statbunker.Messi is better at making the final pass. Xavi was better at controlling the match, and basically a team with Xavi had always the ball.
Xavi also had an insane number of assists. If I am not mistaken, he managed 30+ assists or so in some season. So, it wasn't exactly Tom Cleverley types of passing.
Being the current holder does not make him the current best player.No it indicates that the trophy given to the worlds best player is currently his , and is his until January. The same way Leicester are still champions of England until May 2017.
Serious question , if Ronaldo is better then why hasn't he won more ballon d'ors than messi ?
3! Portugal beat Croatia & FranceI really do not hold the three finals losses against Messi at all. People always underestimate how small the margins are. The three finals Argentina lost these last three years one was in extra time and the other two were penalty shootouts. I also am not giving a ton of credit to Portugal for the Euro win since they won one match out of 7.
Messi is better at making the final pass. Xavi was better at controlling the match, and basically a team with Xavi had always the ball.
Xavi also had an insane number of assists. If I am not mistaken, he managed 30+ assists or so in some season. So, it wasn't exactly Tom Cleverley types of passing.
Let's not get started about the one he won in 2010
That's a debate for another time...Never agreed with that Ballon D'Or, but it was definitely more deserved than Ronaldo's second Ballon D'Or.
Ok take it away . He still has more . Why ?Being the current holder does not make him the current best player.
Leicester are champions until May 2017 does not make them the best team till May 2017.
Let's not get started about the one he won in 2010
If I am not mistaken, he had 30 assists in 08-09 in all competitions (for Barca). I might be wrong though @Brwned @Invictus~20 assists in 09/10 for Barcelona and Spain according to transfermarkt and statbunker.
Only for a few more months, also because Blatter likes Messi betterOk take it away . He still has more . Why ?
Well Xavi's job was to control the game from deep. But he was still very capable of creating from there and in 2008/09 racked up over 30 assists, which was exceptional given he was typically 30 yards behind the opposition defensive line.Xavi's passing accuracy . Of that 94%, I bet you 80+% of them were sideways . Messi is a far superior playmaker than Xavi
Yep, you're right, Xavi had 28 assists in 2008/2009.If I am not mistaken, he had 30 assists in 08-09 in all competitions (for Barca). I might be wrong though @Brwned @Invictus
Still, it is an insane number, likely higher than Messi ever made. But to add to that, Xavi was making near 100 passes per match, with an accuracy of 93-96% over the course of the entire season, and was covering a crazy amount of ground (i.e being always near the ball).
If I had to design a playmaker, that would be Xavi.
Only for a few more months, also because Blatter likes Messi better
Agreed on all counts. In that case, I take issue with your description of a Messi fanboy: "those that think Messi is some kind of God tier footballer way ahead of Ronaldo are fanboying". I don't mindlessly support Messi no matter what but I think he is significantly better than Ronaldo, on the whole. He's at a similar level as a goalscorer and a better creator. On the whole, they're the only things that matter for Messi and Ronaldo - end product in the final third. You could argue Messi also controls the game, but I don't think he quite does that to a level worth talking about. The talk about Ronaldo being better at heading, shooting, faster etc. are largely irrelevant because they all are ultimately focused around his ability to score goals - he doesn't offer an awful lot outside of that. Those qualities, which he is obviously superior at, are an important part of his obscene goalscoring record but don't make much difference beyond that.
For example, I think his three consecutive final losses is a significant blight on his career, and the idea that it's his team-mates' fault for not winning an international tournament is silly. Even sillier is the idea that he simply plays in a team not good enough to win an international tournament - a myth that was perpetuated over and over again prior to 2014 WC, but the fact they've been able to reach those three finals put that argument to bed. It's not a dominant team like Spain a few years ago, but it's certainly good enough to win a tournament. He's failed.
I also don't think he's the greatest player of all-time. I think it's arguable he's not even the 2nd best Argentine footballer of all-time.
The idea that only Messi fanboys think Messi is significantly better is just wrong, IMO. You can't just dismiss it as fanboyism because you don't agree with it. That's fanboyism.
If you're going with absurd statements, there's no point carrying on. Any of these Leicester players score 50 goals?You see how immature your argument gets when you are presented with a simple fact ? Messi has won 2 more ballon d'ors as we speak right now and is therefore the better player over the last 8 years .
And if Ronaldo wins the ballon d'or in January , he really had better put in some godly performances for the first half of the season . Yes Ronaldo won the titles , but from an individual performance standpoint , every single player in the Leicester team played more consistently than Ronaldo. Goals aside , the vast majority of his performances on the pitch were dogshit and you know it . Even his own fans booed him on several occasions he was playing that bad.