Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Many people consider Holland 74/78 one of the best teams ever, they fail to win both WC so no, it´s not all about winning, Messi is the better player, by far, even if he never wins another tournament again, plese drop it.
Maybe 74 is in the discussion, I've literally NEVER heard anyone call Holland 78 one of the best teams ever.

If he never wins another trophy, he'd be remembered as a bottler of highest order after having a few good years at the turn of the decade.
 
United were dominating the EPL before Ronaldo arrived and won the league after he left.

United the league 6 times out of 8 years from 1996-2003.

EPL was a one team league with United so dominant.
Wrong.

Mourinho says hi.
 
Wrong.

Mourinho says hi.

Wrong that United dominated the EPL prior to Ronaldo arriving? You criticize La Liga yet Barca weren't winning the league nearly as often until Messi arrived. United have the most EPL titles in history, and again, winning 6 titles out of 8, 8 titles in 11 years prior to Ronaldo is dominating making the EPL feel like a one team league as it was United winning almost every year.

United went on to win the league twice after he left and made a CL final.
 
I said ONE OF, if you believe 09-11 Barca to be the best club side ever, can you name 4 others that are better than the Real side?

If they're in a group of 5, seems reasonable to call them "one of" the best? No?

I just posted above that neither Milan nor Bayern had great domestic records during their CL repeats, so what exactly is your point here?
They're comfortable a tier below the greatest teams of all time for me, that's all. Just like you could say Griezmann is one of the best in the world, I still wouldn't put his name in the same list as Ronaldo and Messi.

Ronaldo didn’t have half the help between 2016 and 2018 than Messi had between 2009 and 2011.
Which only proves my point, thanks for that.
 
Maybe 74 is in the discussion, I've literally NEVER heard anyone call Holland 78 one of the best teams ever.

If he never wins another trophy, he'd be remembered as a bottler of highest order after having a few good years at the turn of the decade.

What a moronic quote. A guy who has destroyed Ronaldo's teams more than any other in history is a bottler despite winning 4 CL's and having as many trebles as anyone else in history.

Got it. Meanwhile Madrid would constantly bottle the league.
 
Wrong that United dominated the EPL prior to Ronaldo arriving? You criticize La Liga yet Barca weren't winning the league nearly as often until Messi arrived. United have the most EPL titles in history, and again, winning 6 titles out of 8, 8 titles in 11 years prior to Ronaldo is dominating making the EPL feel like a one team league as it was United winning almost every year.
Put things into context, also look into how many teams have done 3x PL compared to La Liga.

When Ronaldo arrived we were no way in the running for the league, in fact in that period there were people calling for Sir Alex's head. Messi has been winning his titles with little competition and playing for one of the greatest club sides of all time. It's not comparable.
 
United were dominating the EPL before Ronaldo arrived and won the league after he left.

United the league 6 times out of 8 years from 1996-2003.

EPL was a one team league with United so dominant.
Hilarious that you've quoted a time period BEFORE Abramovich came along and Chelsea were considered the dominant side in the league when they broke all kinds of records to win the league in 2004.

Barcelona also won the league in 04-05 when Messi contributed a grand ONE goal, he wouldn't even qualify for a medal under PL rules (no idea if he got one under La Liga rules)
 
They're comfortable a tier below the greatest teams of all time for me, that's all. Just like you could say Griezmann is one of the best in the world, I still wouldn't put his name in the same list as Ronaldo and Messi.
Personally I think they're a better CL side than Barca 09-11, but that's another argument for somewhere else.
 
Put things into context, also look into how many teams have done 3x PL compared to La Liga.

When Ronaldo arrived we were no way in the running for the league, in fact in that period there were people calling for Sir Alex's head. Messi has been winning his titles with little competition and playing for one of the greatest club sides of all time. It's not comparable.

With little competition? Is this a joke? He was going up against a team that would blow away EPL teams in Real Madrid. How is that little competition? And again, United went on to win the league twice and go to a CL final.

Ronaldo absolutely deserves credit for United winning the league, but at the end of the day United continued to win the league a few more times without him. Those United teams were stacked.

Bit daft to downplay La Liga when it was dominating the CL. Atletico were no slouch either. Better than the EPL teams who were having a fairly woeful decade compared to what the league used to be.
 
Hilarious that you've quoted a time period BEFORE Abramovich came along and Chelsea were considered the dominant side in the league when they broke all kinds of records to win the league in 2004.

Barcelona also won the league in 04-05 when Messi contributed a grand ONE goal, he wouldn't even qualify for a medal under PL rules (no idea if he got one under La Liga rules)

Who cares about 2005, the FACT is Barcelona's greatest period in their history came when Messi arrived. Even after Iniesta and Xavi left Barca are still racking up the trophies in Spain. The number of times Barca have denied Madrid trophies in Spain is staggering. Messi is a huge part of that.

Trophies won before Lionel Messi's senior debut: Barcelona - 62 Real Madrid - 72 After: Barcelona - 95 Real Madrid - 92

And a could chance it could be 97-92 if Barca win the league and Copa Del Rey.
 
What a moronic quote. A guy who has destroyed Ronaldo's teams more than any other in history is a bottler despite winning 4 CL's and having as many trebles as anyone else in history.

Got it. Meanwhile Madrid would constantly bottle the league.
If he wins nothing from now on, he'd have had a very successful early 20s (22-24), had a bounce in 2015 (28) and a pretty poor end to his career. No?

If someone is wildly successful early in their career and finishes badly, that's exactly what bottlers do.
 
If he wins nothing from now on, he'd have had a very successful early 20s (22-24), had a bounce in 2015 (28) and a pretty poor end to his career. No?

If someone is wildly successful early in their career and finishes badly, that's exactly what bottlers do.

So is Michael Jordan a bottler? LeBron James? They either cameback or slowed down. And Messi is still winning more trophies per year than Ronaldo to close it out. If Ronaldo never wins CL again is a bottler despite being in a top 4 team in the world? It wasn't like Messi was going trophy-less during this time.

It's like CL or nothing for you, Messi retires today he is still considered the GOAT.
 
Maybe 74 is in the discussion, I've literally NEVER heard anyone call Holland 78 one of the best teams ever.

If he never wins another trophy, he'd be remembered as a bottler of highest order after having a few good years at the turn of the decade.
In 15 seasons:

10 La Liga
6 Copa Del Rey (probably 7)
4 Champions Leagues (potentially 5)

AKA a bottler of the highest order after a few good years at the turn of the decade, ladies and gentlemen.
 
In 15 seasons:

10 La Liga
6 Copa Del Rey (probably 7)
4 Champions Leagues (potentially 5)

AKA a bottler of the highest order after a few good years at the turn of the decade, ladies and gentlemen.

:lol: It's ridiculous isn't it?
 
So is Michael Jordan a bottler? LeBron James? They either cameback or slowed down. And Messi is still winning more trophies per year than Ronaldo to close it out. If Ronaldo never wins CL again is a bottler despite being in a top 4 team in the world? It wasn't like Messi was going trophy-less during this time.

It's like CL or nothing for you, Messi retires today he is still considered the GOAT.
Not worth arguing with the guy - he's on course for 5 straight Copa del Reys but those don't count anymore apparently.
 
Who cares about 2005, the FACT is Barcelona's greatest period in their history came when Messi arrived. Even after Iniesta and Xavi left Barca are still racking up the trophies in Spain. The number of times Barca have denied Madrid trophies in Spain is staggering. Messi is a huge part of that.

Trophies won before Lionel Messi's senior debut: Barcelona - 62 Real Madrid - 72 After: Barcelona - 95 Real Madrid - 92

And a could chance it could be 97-92 if Barca win the league and Copa Del Rey.
:lol: There we go with the false equivalence again, CDR is worth the same as the CL. :lol:

I have not denied Messi is a key factor to Barca's best period ever, where did I say that? I merely pointed out that he started in a La Liga winning team in 2005, unlike Ronaldo who started at a United side which finished 15 points behind Arsenal in 2004.
 
With little competition? Is this a joke? He was going up against a team that would blow away EPL teams in Real Madrid. How is that little competition? And again, United went on to win the league twice and go to a CL final.

Ronaldo absolutely deserves credit for United winning the league, but at the end of the day United continued to win the league a few more times without him. Those United teams were stacked.

Bit daft to downplay La Liga when it was dominating the CL. Atletico were no slouch either. Better than the EPL teams who were having a fairly woeful decade compared to what the league used to be.
Apart for those 3 there is no competition, that's why Barca and Real are scoring 5+ goals almost every week, even Mourinho managed to score 100 goals in that league which says it all. Its a cliché but there arent many easy games in the PL and those massive score lines don't happen that often here .
 
So is Michael Jordan a bottler? LeBron James? They either cameback or slowed down. And Messi is still winning more trophies per year than Ronaldo to close it out. If Ronaldo never wins CL again is a bottler despite being in a top 4 team in the world? It wasn't like Messi was going trophy-less during this time.

It's like CL or nothing for you, Messi retires today he is still considered the GOAT.
You were the one who came up with the hypothetical that Messi wins nothing from now on, not me. :rolleyes:

If he throws away La Liga this season, it's already one of the biggest bottle jobs ever.

In 15 seasons:

10 La Liga
6 Copa Del Rey (probably 7)
4 Champions Leagues (potentially 5)

AKA a bottler of the highest order after a few good years at the turn of the decade, ladies and gentlemen.
It's the Messi fanatic @Daysleeper that suggested the hypothetical that Messi wins nothing from now on.
 
Not worth arguing with the guy - he's on course for 5 straight Copa del Reys but those don't count anymore apparently.
Sure, those are the biggest trophies on offer, Real start the season aiming to win CDR and ignore the CL. :lol:

There's a reason that Madrid have a relatively poor CDR record compared to Barca even before Messi came onto the stage.
 
United were dominating the EPL before Ronaldo arrived and won the league after he left.

United the league 6 times out of 8 years from 1996-2003.

EPL was a one team league with United so dominant.

:lol: Ronaldo was signed in 03, we did not win the premier league until 06/07. The year we did win it, he was the player of the season and would have won balon dor if not for kaka.
 
Its what is usually argued against the "stats" and "won more" brigade. You can be better, despite having worse stats and winning less. Look at Diego as your typical example. Why is he considered amongst the 3 best players of all time by the majority of people? There are many footballers with better stats and many footballers who won more. Gerd Muller is another example. How many footballers in history can combine the following: stats and trophies won in one of the toughest leagues in the world, European cup level, World cup level and Euro champz level. Not just that but he is also one of (if not the most) decisive players in history (scorer in world cup and Euro champs final for example).
Why isnt a guy with his resume mentioned at the top table? Shouldn't he be, if its all about stats and winning?
Diego, Pele, Cruyff and Messi are considered the greatest of them all because they won, AND also because they had the GAME that many players before them didnt. They were unique. Gerd Mullers game wasnt unique, he was just a better version of what had come before. Who had seen anyone like Diego before he came about? Beckenbauers revolutionary and unique abilities set him above all other defenders.
Cristiano, despite winning, and having great stats, doesnt leave the same imprint on the game. You dont watch him, and think, youve litteraly never seen the things he does. His consistency at the very highest level is close to unparalleled. Which is why, when many people say they prefer him over Leo, its not usually based on their games (they say hes played in different leagues, hes scored more, hes won more et al). But wheres the GAME based argument to sit him up there with Leo, Johann and Diego? It simply doesnt exist.
I don't disagree with this honestly, which is why I said in the post before that to me Messi is clearly a superior player, but not a more successful player. Whether succes or ability constitutes greatness however, is up for debate.
 
Seriously? Any football discussions regarding the best clubs sides ever normally include the likes of Real 15-18, Barca 09-11, Milan 88-90, Ajax, Bayern (70s) etc, the discussions among United fans regarding our best ever teams tends to be United 99 v United 08, all those sides won the CL. Does anyone include the Real side in the 80s that won lots of La Liga but no the CL in the conversation?

There's a reason why the CL is valued above the league title.

As for Klose, the point is being key player of their club like Ronaldo & Messi makes a big difference to being just another name on the team sheet.

Di Stefano's Real is still considered above Zidane's by most long timers I talk to.
And you are also missing a lot of sides like Pele's Santos, Peñarol, Clough's Forest, Liverpool, Tele Santana's São Paulo, Cruyff's Dream Team
 
I think neither Messi nor Ronaldo ever had a more decisive league contribution than RVP in his first season at United honestly. That season was more exciting than Messi and Ronaldo's entire careers combined if you ask me.

You know why? Because I'm biased as feck. It's liberating to admit that you know. pfeeeeeeeeeew
 
I think neither Messi nor Ronaldo ever had a more decisive league contribution than RVP in his first season at United honestly. That season was more exciting than Messi and Ronaldo's entire careers combined if you ask me.

You know why? Because I'm biased as feck. It's liberating to admit that you know. pfeeeeeeeeeew

So you want to change the half/half scarf image to a nologo black scarf?
 
Apart for those 3 there is no competition, that's why Barca and Real are scoring 5+ goals almost every week, even Mourinho managed to score 100 goals in that league which says it all. Its a cliché but there arent many easy games in the PL and those massive score lines don't happen that often here .

Since when are barca and Madrid scoring 5 goals every week? Have you even seen the La Liga in recent years? City just walked the league last year. Barca just drew wth villareal. Chelsea or thumped 6-0. There are FAR more lopsided scores this year and last in epl than La Liga. You’re speaking like seone who thinks it’s still 2011 or something. The bottom half of La Liga is much stronger than the bottom half of the EPL. Even teams fighting relegation like villareal are doing very well in Europa
 
Di Stefano's Real is still considered above Zidane's by most long timers I talk to.
And you are also missing a lot of sides like Pele's Santos, Peñarol, Clough's Forest, Liverpool, Tele Santana's São Paulo, Cruyff's Dream Team
That's the thing about arguing across generations, older people tend to believe everything is better in the good old days, you even have United fans arguing for United 94 v United 08.

That list I posted was by no means supposed to be a complete list, that's why the "etc" at the end. But the point is, all the teams in the argument (the European ones anyway), won the CL.
 
:lol: Ronaldo was signed in 03, we did not win the premier league until 06/07. The year we did win it, he was the player of the season and would have won balon dor if not for kaka.

And again, after he left you won it two more times and went to a CL final.
 
Since when are barca and Madrid scoring 5 goals every week? Have you even seen the La Liga in recent years? City just walked the league last year. Barca just drew wth villareal. Chelsea or thumped 6-0. There are FAR more lopsided scores this year and last in epl than La Liga. You’re speaking like seone who thinks it’s still 2011 or something. The bottom half of La Liga is much stronger than the bottom half of the EPL. Even teams fighting relegation like villareal are doing very well in Europa
:eek: A post from you that I agree with. :eek:
 
Sure, those are the biggest trophies on offer, Real start the season aiming to win CDR and ignore the CL. :lol:

There's a reason that Madrid have a relatively poor CDR record compared to Barca even before Messi came onto the stage.

Zidane said winning the league is harder than winning CL. Madrid bottled the league a lot but of course those Barca teams were great.
 
And again, after he left you won it two more times and went to a CL final.

Yes? Because the team we had at that point was finally good and we had the best manager of all time.

That has nothing to do with the state we were in before he signed and his role in our first title.

You guys include 2006 in messis cl but are now arguing that Ronaldo had nothing to do with 06/07?
 
:lol: There we go with the false equivalence again, CDR is worth the same as the CL. :lol:

I have not denied Messi is a key factor to Barca's best period ever, where did I say that? I merely pointed out that he started in a La Liga winning team in 2005, unlike Ronaldo who started at a United side which finished 15 points behind Arsenal in 2004.

And prior to 2004 united won 8 of the last 11 EPL titles.
 
Zidane said winning the league is harder than winning CL. Madrid bottled the league a lot but of course those Barca teams were great.
Funny how Zidane talking about the league is to be taken as gospel.

Zidane saying Ronaldo is the best player ever is to be ignored.

Make up your mind.
 
Yes? Because the team we had at that point was finally good and we had the best manager of all time.

That has nothing to do with the state we were in before he signed and his role in our first title.

You guys include 2006 in messis cl but are now arguing that Ronaldo had nothing to do with 06/07?

Did you not read my posts at all?! I said Ronaldo ABSOLUTELY deserves credit for united winning those epl titles. He was obviously their best player.

However, United has been dominating most of the 90’s and early 2000’s before slowing down.

United have historically been an incredible epl side prior to Ronaldo, Barca were up and down through the years before Messi joined. United had won 3 in a row before Ronaldo, Barca went through the greatest period in their history with Messi

I do agree that united weren’t at their complete best when Ronaldo joined of course and he was instrumental in helping them regain their footing. But again, even After he left United continued to win the league and go to an epl final.
 
Funny how Zidane talking about the league is to be taken as gospel.

Zidane saying Ronaldo is the best player ever is to be ignored.

Make up your mind.

Before he managed Ronaldo he was Praising Messi as the best. Same reason why I never quote Pep as saying Messi is the goat.

Less of a bias with zidane and the league since he always wanted
To win it more often than he did.
 
Did you not read my posts at all?! I said Ronaldo ABSOLUTELY deserves credit for united winning those epl titles. He was obviously their best player.

However, United has been dominating most of the 90’s and wary 2000’s before slowing down.

United have historically been an incredible epl side prior to Ronaldo, Barca were up and down through the years before Messi joined. United had won 3 in a row before Ronaldo, Barca went through the greatest period in their history with Messi

If Ronaldo had stayed at United, we would have gone through our greatest period in the history with him as well.

A club which had the peak years of Maradona and ronaldinho among others would have done just alright without messi.

So your point is basically that messi spent longer at Barca than Ronaldo did at United? No shit sherlock.
 
Funny how Zidane talking about the league is to be taken as gospel.

Zidane saying Ronaldo is the best player ever is to be ignored.

Make up your mind.

Did you even read what he said? He said Ronaldo is the best player in Real Madrid’s history. Big difference :lol:

”Yes,” Zidane said. “There have been many players who have made history at this club. But nobody has done what he has — the statistics speaks for that. What he has done is impressive. So I think yes [he is the best in history].”
 
If Ronaldo had stayed at United, we would have gone through our greatest period in the history with him as well.

A club which had the peak years of Maradona and ronaldinho among others would have done just alright without messi.

So your point is basically that messi spent longer at Barca than Ronaldo did at United? No shit sherlock.

Hahahahaha without Messi Barca would’ve been fine?!

Oh my god, that is amazing.
Ronaldinho fell off a cliff as amazing as he was.

This is the most insane thing I’ve ever read. Barca would’ve been fine without Messi :wenger:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.