MJJ
New Member
No, at least four years as the best midfield in the world (and still not on the level of Xavi, Iniesta, Busquets, who does even claim so?). No matter how much you repeat it, it certainly wasn't one year. In 2018 you could make a case for City but Kroos and Modric would look even better than the Silvas, de Bruyne and Gündogan if they were to be coached by Pep.
The fact that you think Alonso was better than Casemiro and Thiago better than Kroos says everything, really. I mean, have you seen how vulnerable Alonso was to pressing at Madrid? But that you just stated the duo Arturo Vidal and Thiago are better than Kroos and Luka Modric tops even that.
This is just ridiculous. Your perception is completely distorted. If Kroos or Modric had played for Barca you'd sure as hell have them in the same tier as Iniesta and Xavi. Of course they aren't but im sure you'd find a way to convince yourself of that in the same way you convinced yourself Ivan fecking Rakitic is better than Kroos.
Jesus, the things I'm discussing with you. This is just unreal.
Four years, so we begin with:-
2013-2014- Madrid first choice midfield was Di maria, Khedira/Alonso and Modric. Kroos was not even signed this year.
2014-2015-Casemiro was sent out on loan, Modric wasn't a starter making only 25 appearances and the best midfield in the world was the Juve diamond.
2015-2016- First year the trio really started playing together. I would still have a 31 year old iniesta ahead of the trio and pogba/veratti are the same level as kroos who hadn't broken out yet.
2016-2017- The year they were undisputed best midfield in the world, reflected in the UEFA votes too.
2017-2018- Modric and KDB are the two stand out midfielders with kroos/casemiro still turning it up occasionally but not much between the latter two and somebody like veratti.
So which four years is this?