VancouverUtdFan
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2017
- Messages
- 2,514
- Supports
- Canucks + NE Patriots
Agree with your last sentence (down to the manager's tactics though), but definitely not with the bolded part - he carried them against Spain but was hardly involved after his goal against Morocco. If not for a great save by Rui Patricio, Portugal would've been on the grand total of 2 points and would've needed to beat a tough Iran side to proceed, which isn't that particularly great either. It's all just narrative, but the fact that Portugal didn't concede after they went up yesterday had little to do with Ronaldo, just like the fact that Argentina got behind yesterday had little to do with Messi. One player can only do so much (which Ronaldo did against Spain and Messi has failed to do so far).But you're judging it on the result.
Argentina are the result of either Messi not being capable /unwilling to carry Argentina and all their flaws v an Iceland side who has everybody working incredibly hard to raise the unit.
I say Messi since he's an all time great, others can share the burden.
Its like when posters say they prefer Portugal's eleven .
Portugal's eleven are only in the conversation because of Ronaldo. This is the result of Ronaldo strapping 10 players on his back and doing work. Looking at this Portugal / Iceland / Argentina side and judging them on what they are doing against what they should be doing are two different things.
Give the Iceland manager the option to choose Argentinian players in their side and what do we think he does? It would be dominated by Argentinian players IMO.
Apart from being a passanger, Messi's worst influence concerns team selection. Why is Dybala on the bench? Not having Icardi and not playing Dybala is on Messi.
I think they did. They're crazy about football and their NT there anyway.Do the Argentinians ever truly feel they had a chance to win this World Cup ? If not then maybe they shouldn't and won't feel that angry at him.
I mean, the chances of scoring are still above 50% right? It's hardly a feat only a select few can achieve. He's a good penalty taker but to suggest this somehow elevates him above all else is laughable.
Talk about spinning things to make Ronaldo look better. Let someone else take the penalty and the odds are they score.
It just cements his legacy even further. Ronaldo isn’t a choker and steps up in the biggest moments, that’s the difference.
He took it upon himself to make sure his team wouldn’t bottle a 3 goal aggregate lead in the 2nd leg unlike someone else...
Do the Argentinians ever truly feel they had a chance to win this World Cup ? If not then maybe they shouldn't and won't feel that angry at him.
Who's the better player, James or Bryant?Btw Messi has missed 4 of his last 7 penalties. Just to put things into perspective for all those who laughed during the CL that anyone could have scored the penalty against Juvé. Not even that, recently against Spain with the same thing being said and Messi missing less than 24 hours later.
Expect a flurry of random tweets now.Who's the better player, James or Bryant?
Who was the better player when it mattered most?
I'll get my coat.
Who's the better player, James or Bryant?
Who was the better player when it mattered most?
I'll get my coat.
I thought you were an American sports fan, never mind then. Just wanted to show that "stepping up and not being a choker" isn't the end all be all.What?
Who's the better player, James or Bryant?
Who was the better player when it mattered most?
I'll get my coat.
Of course they should expect to be in the contention when they supposedly have one of the best players of all time, the best striker in the Premier League, the best striker in Serie A, not to mention the other household names.Do the Argentinians ever truly feel they had a chance to win this World Cup ? If not then maybe they shouldn't and won't feel that angry at him.
I thought you were an American sports fan, never mind then. Just wanted to show that "stepping up and not being a choker" isn't the end all be all.
I wonder whether there was this much debate when Ronaldo's Portugal crashed out in '14 against the mighty US of A whilst Messi guided his team past the group stage on to the WC final.
But they are now?No, because people weren't ignorant enough to completely ignore the context in which that happened.
Yeah well to be in contention and seeing yourself as a favorite is a bit different. Looks delusion was strong in this one for many of their fansOf course they should expect to be in the contention when they supposedly have one of the best players of all time, the best striker in the Premier League, the best striker in Serie A, not to mention the other household names.
The best players often win. So you can't blame a nation for having high hopes.Yeah well to be in contention and seeing yourself as a favorite is a bit different. Looks delusion was strong in this one for many of their fans
Yeah but James got swept thoughWho's the better player, James or Jordan?
James scores about the same but he assists and rebounds more...
But they are now?
I thought you were an American sports fan, never mind then. Just wanted to show that "stepping up and not being a choker" isn't the end all be all.
I wonder whether there was this much debate when Ronaldo's Portugal crashed out in '14 against the mighty US of A whilst Messi guided his team past the group stage on to the WC final.
When they play as a team, the best players have the biggest chances of winning no doubt. You won' t see me arguing with that point but Argentina stopped being a team a while ago. Their WC was based on Messi pulling off miracles after miracles which is very low percentage tactics. If you go into a tournament like that, chances are it'll be very tough on you.The best players often win. So you can't blame a nation for having high hopes.
I'd say that's a perfect comparison, they both have a poor supporting cast (their third best player "on paper" yesterday was a 48-year old Mascherano), and both might end up with 4 points, beating a lesser team, drawing with an equal team and losing to a superior team.If that's what you're doing then yes.
Ronaldo was badly injured for the 2014 WC, our second best player in Pepe got sent off at the start of the game vs Germany and missed the second game through suspension, Coentrão and Patricio were our third and fourth best players and they got injured along with a couple of other important players.
Ronaldo was by far our best player and if we got 4 points out of that group then it was because of him. So yes, people trying to compare that World Cup with Messi's current World Cup are either being ignorant or dishonest.
The best players often win. So you can't blame a nation for having high hopes.
Messi is one of the GOATs, just not THE GOAT. A failed World Cup should never change thatSo one of them has to be named the greatest of all time and the other a fraud? These people are beyond ridiculous. I'm starting to feel a bit bad for Messi, he's not having a good World Cup but people shouldn't have such a short-term memory. It will always be a personal preference between these two as they have proved over and over again that they are unmatched in modern day football.
So one of them has to be named the greatest of all time and the other a fraud? These people are beyond ridiculous. I'm starting to feel a bit bad for Messi, he's not having a good World Cup but people shouldn't have such a short-term memory. It will always be a personal preference between these two as they have proved over and over again that they are unmatched in modern day football.
Messi being the best of all time is a valid opinion. I'm in the Ronaldo camp, purely based on how he inspired me in my life.Messi is one of the GOATs, just not THE GOAT. A failed World Cup should never change that
I'd say that's a perfect comparison, they both have a poor supporting cast (their third best player "on paper" yesterday was a 48-year old Mascherano), and both might end up with 4 points, beating a lesser team, drawing with an equal team and losing to a superior team.
I'd say it's similar.If you ignore these differences:
1) Ronaldo was badly injured to the point he shouldn't have even played and fecked up his knees ever since Can't have it both ways, Salah was a pussy for going off, Ronaldo only has himself to blame if he wanted to continue playing
2) Germany are much stronger than Croatia, US stronger than Iceland and Ghana stronger than Nigeria US was piss poor in '14 and certainly not better than Iceland
3) Ronaldo played better Tournament isn't over yet
4) Messi had better teammats around him Their XI yesterday was so, so poor, I don't know the '14 Portugal squad but hard to imagine they were worse
Then yes, there were no differences.
If you ignore these differences:
1) Ronaldo was badly injured to the point he shouldn't have even played and fecked up his knees ever since
2) Germany are much stronger than Croatia, US stronger than Iceland and Ghana stronger than Nigeria
3) Ronaldo played better
4) Messi had better teammats around him
Then yes, there were no differences.
Messi so far has played the worst international tournament either of them have played in their whole careers.
People have seen these players play every week for over a decade, that is a better metric of their ability.Well the term is used in relevance. In terms of international play which there is a night and day difference.
I'd say it's similar.
We're only two group games into the tournament. Portugal can easily crash out against Uruguay or Russia and all this debate would be for nothing.
I'm not arguing that Ronaldo has been great and Messi has been poor.Did I ever call Salah a pussy for going off the pitch??? Wtf
And yes, Messi's teammates for this World Cup aren't just better than Ronaldo's for the last World Cup. They're much better.
We could easily go out against Iran next round and Argentina can end up going through and winning the tournament, I'm talkng about what has happened so far
I agree. It's a matter of opinion but it's not completely wrong to have it. Easily with Ronaldo the best player I have ever watched. I think the GOAT is impossible to determine fairly as football has a long history and it has evolved way too muchMessi being the best of all time is a valid opinion. I'm in the Ronaldo camp, purely based on how he inspired me in my life.
Bookies are as unbiased as someone can be (otherwise they will be out of business) and they had Argentina as fifth favorite (after Brazil, Germany, France and Spain).I'm not arguing that Ronaldo has been great and Messi has been poor.
I'm saying people should stop drooling over Ronaldo and bashing Messi based on what they think should be happening, rather than the reality on the pitch. Or, as someone else said a few pages ago, "because Argentina should be beating Iceland since they have a much bigger population". Like I said, the accusations against Messi are way over the top and it's as if the past twelve years never even happened.
Argentina is bang average and not even in the top half of squads present at the WC, the way I see it. It's on Messi to improve them and drag them through, which he failed to do so far. But let's not impose imaginary expectations on him either, which one should know if the CONMEBOL qualifiers were anything to go by (they didn't lie, obviously).