Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
CL is crunch time; you either put up or shut up.

...you think Usain Bolt prefers winning track meets every few months over Olympic Gold? Same thing here with the CL. Next, you’ll be saying winning the league is bigger than a World Cup.


Stop defending Messi of all blame. You’re just desperate at this point.

The CL may be more prestigious but you only have to play 7 games after the group stage to win it.

Get a low level team in the 2nd round then you only have to play the best teams 5 times.

In the league Real have to play the best teams 4 times. Barca and Athletico.

It's ridiculous to suggest that winning La Liga is harder than the CL. It's quite simple - the better the participating teams, the harder the competition to win. Unless you think the likes of Betis, Bilbao are better than the Bayern, PSG, Man City of this world.

The best players step up on the biggest stage, see Federer's grand slam record for example.

Just because all the best teams are in it does not mean you have to play all of them big teams.


Winning the championship is better than winning the World Cup too then, one only has 7 games at most while the other has 46 so it is a better representation of a team's quality and therefore it is the best competition. Or does your logic only work in certain scenarios?

Seriously though, is there a single Barcelona or Madrid fan in the whole world who would rather win the league over the Champions League?

My point is that Ronaldo only has to be at his best for 7 games at most, and teams can win it with their best player only at their best for 3 games.

Messi has been great for 8 months and has 1 bad game against Roma. Ronaldo was poor for 4 months and has been great for 4.

It is ridiculous to discredit Messi for one game but then credit Ronaldo for possibly the next four.

No one can argue who has been better for longer this season.
 
The thing is, a lot of people are using “Ronaldo has been better in the CL so he is the better of the two”

However, the CL requires players for the top teams to be at their best for 7 games if they win it. They can even win it by being at their best in only 3-4 of them games.

Why hasn’t Ronaldo been able to do it week in week out all season then? Because his team are 15 points behind Barcelona right now.

People will use excuses of “because the team have been poor, not just him”. But when his team wins in the CL people say “it was all because of Ronaldo”.

For me running away with the league is better than winning the CL. Because you have to play much more games. Liverpool and Chelsea both finished 4th and won the CL.

For me Messi has been far better than Ronaldo this season.

Messi is the main reason his team are so far ahead of Real and the rest. And was also unbelievable in both legs vs Chelsea.

As soon as he has a poor 2nd leg (which is one gam by the way), he is suddenly worse than Ron?

1 game in the CL of being vs 20 La Liga games of being poor for Ron.

You can’t just decide that because one wins the CL and the other wins the league that only the CL matters because that is the only way you can argue Ron has been better this season. Which he hasn’t.

With a good solid team winning the league is piss easy. You play 38 games and you can afford to lose a few, in 38 games the quality of the team really shows an averages out over 38 games.

A team like barca or madrid can get a shock lost against anyone but at the end they're too good in 38 games for anyone else.

Playing a knockout competition is a different animal, all it takes is a lapse of focus and you're suddenly fighting an uphill battle.
 
With a good solid team winning the league is piss easy. You play 38 games and you can afford to lose a few, in 38 games the quality of the team really shows an averages out over 38 games.

A team like barca or madrid can get a shock lost against anyone but at the end they're too good in 38 games for anyone else.

Playing a knockout competition is a different animal, all it takes is a lapse of focus and you're suddenly fighting an uphill battle.


True, but read my post above mate. Ron only has to be at his best for 7 games in the CL. But has to be at his best all season to have any chance of Real winning the league.

Messi has been way more consistent.
 
The CL may be more prestigious but you only have to play 7 games after the group stage to win it.

Get a low level team in the 2nd round then you only have to play the best teams 5 times.

In the league Real have to play the best teams 4 times. Barca and Athletico.



Just because all the best teams are in it does not mean you have to play all of them big teams.




My point is that Ronaldo only has to be at his best for 7 games at most, and teams can win it with their best player only at their best for 3 games.

Messi has been great for 8 months and has 1 bad game against Roma. Ronaldo was poor for 4 months and has been great for 4.

It is ridiculous to discredit Messi for one game but then credit Ronaldo for possibly the next four.

No one can argue who has been better for longer this season.


Well it’s settled.

I guess there should be no exams or tests in school any longer. Homework should be worth more since it’s a longer duration than them.
 
4 times in 5 seasons Messi has disappeared in the CL knockout stage, do you not see a pattern emerging?
And what about all those seasons Ronaldo failed and Messi was winning it earlier? This rivalry didn't start from 2014.

If people put their biases and agenda's aside it's clear to see both of their successful periods have come when they were playing in very strong teams. Not saying there is anything wrong with that.
 
Last edited:
The CL may be more prestigious but you only have to play 7 games after the group stage to win it.

Get a low level team in the 2nd round then you only have to play the best teams 5 times.

In the league Real have to play the best teams 4 times. Barca and Athletico.



Just because all the best teams are in it does not mean you have to play all of them big teams.


My point is that Ronaldo only has to be at his best for 7 games at most, and teams can win it with their best player only at their best for 3 games.

Messi has been great for 8 months and has 1 bad game against Roma. Ronaldo was poor for 4 months and has been great for 4.

It is ridiculous to discredit Messi for one game but then credit Ronaldo for possibly the next four.

No one can argue who has been better for longer this season.
Basically you're saying Messi is a more consistent player than Ronaldo in 17/18.

Consistency doesn't always mean greatness.
 
And what about all those seasons Ronaldo failed and Messi was winning it earlier? This rivalry didn't start from 2014.

If people put their biases and agenda's aside it's clear to see both of their successful periods have come when they were playing in very strong teams. Not saying there is nothing wrong with that.

Everyone always degraded Ronaldo so it’s fair Messi deserves it as well. From 2012-2018, Lionel Messi only has one good UCL campaign. That’s unacceptable and deserves criticism. You can’t keep performing well in La Liga but look like a different player in Europe and expect a free pass just because your name isn’t Ronaldo.
 
Basically you're saying Messi is a more consistent player than Ronaldo in 17/18.

Consistency doesn't always mean greatness.

True but showing up in big games does not always mean greatness either.

Ronaldo has shown up more than Messi in the last 2/3 years of the CL but Messi did more than Ronaldo before that.
 
True, but read my post above mate. Ron only has to be at his best for 7 games in the CL. But has to be at his best all season to have any chance of Real winning the league.

Messi has been way more consistent.

That's true if he only does it in cl. The same ronaldo also plays week in week out with considerable goals churned.

The way you put it is as if madrid only plays 7 games a year. Look at their appereances this season, the numbers are comparable.
 
Everyone always degraded Ronaldo so it’s fair Messi deserves it as well. From 2012-2018, Lionel Messi only has one good UCL campaign. That’s unacceptable and deserves criticism. You can’t keep performing well in La Liga but look like a different player in Europe and expect a free pass just because your name isn’t Ronaldo.

Well that seems all a bit childish and a waste of time.

Both are great players, who's better comes down to personal preference.

This abomination of a thread is 216 pages long and no one is likely to change their mind.
 
4 times in 5 seasons Messi has disappeared in the CL knockout stage, do you not see a pattern emerging?

He has disappeared according to you because the only way a player performs well for you is if he scores goals or/and his team goes through. We won't come to an agreement because I simply have a fundamentally different perspective on football than you and this is why I rate Messi higher (not because I am in some cult or anything like you imply). I never really understood the fuss around pure goal scorers and always rated creators higher. Messi does both and when he had a brillant team around him was the indisputed best player in the world.

That's also why Ronaldo can win as many CLs as he wants. As long as he plays the way he plays (and he is most likely not going to change this style anymore) I won't consider him the greater regardless of what a force in the box he is. All this obsession with titles is ridiculous, I think. Messi was lucky to be playing in the best team in the world when he was younger and Cristiano is lucky now because he is playing in it for the last four years. In the end, he may very well end up with more CL titles because he played longer for an absolute top team. Or Barca gets their shit together, turns it around and Messi ends up with more titles. In the end, it won't matter for me. I've seen what Messi is capable of and what Cristiano is and for me it is clear who is the better player.
 
Well that seems all a bit childish and a waste of time.

Both are great players, who's better comes down to personal preference.

This abomination of a thread is 216 pages long and no one is likely to change their mind.

Call it whatever you want.

Fact of the matter is at the end of the day it’s a 2way road and now Messi homers get to taste it. Mostly because they think Messi is perfect and nothing is ever his fault. Hint hint: wrong & wrong.
 
Call it whatever you want.

Fact of the matter is at the end of the day it’s a 2way road and now Messi homers get to taste it. Mostly because they think Messi is perfect and nothing is ever his fault. Hint hint: wrong & wrong.
What's a homer?
 
I would say Messi is the more talented footballer, being the most talented ever.




That tweet doesn’t do anything. Because we can argue that Xavi is better than them both because he has won far more than either. And has 3 international trophies also.

That's true if he only does it in cl. The same ronaldo also plays week in week out with considerable goals churned.

The way you put it is as if madrid only plays 7 games a year. Look at their appereances this season, the numbers are comparable.

I was talking about this season. Because Ronaldo was very poor from August to the end of December.
 
True but showing up in big games does not always mean greatness either.

Ronaldo has shown up more than Messi in the last 2/3 years of the CL but Messi did more than Ronaldo before that.
Has he really though? I think we can agree 09-11 Messi had better team mates, which Ronaldo has already more than made up for in the last few years.

12 & 13 they both failed to make the final.


Real Madrid - 2012 lost to Bayern on penalties.
Barcelona -2012 went out to Chelsea with Messi missing a penalty

Real Madrid - 2013, lost out by 1 goal to Dortmund
Barcelona - 2013, DESTROYED 7-0 on agg by Bayern
 
What's a homer?

Someone who favours one so much they have tunnel vision, can’t see anything other than what they deem right, and turn a blind eye to anything that goes against their narrative.
 
Well that seems all a bit childish and a waste of time.

Both are great players, who's better comes down to personal preference.

This abomination of a thread is 216 pages long and no one is likely to change their mind.
Well, the poll has gone from 72-28 to 59-41 in the space of a few weeks.

People do change their minds.
 
Well, the poll has gone from 72-28 to 59-41 in the space of a few weeks.

People do change their minds.
You can't change your vote in the poll, there have been voting spikes after the recent CL games which explains the changes.
 
Someone who favours one so much they have tunnel vision, can’t see anything other than what they deem right, and turn a blind eye to anything that goes against their narrative.
Plenty of those on both sides though.
 
You can't change your vote in the poll, there have been voting spikes after the recent CL games which explains the changes.
Ahh, so it's gone completely towards Ronaldo in recent weeks... makes sense...
 
Has he really though? I think we can agree 09-11 Messi had better team mates, which Ronaldo has already more than made up for in the last few years.

12 & 13 they both failed to make the final.


Real Madrid - 2012 lost to Bayern on penalties.
Barcelona -2012 went out to Chelsea with Messi missing a penalty

Real Madrid - 2013, lost out by 1 goal to Dortmund
Barcelona - 2013, DESTROYED 7-0 on agg by Bayern

Ronaldo has had better team mates the last few years though, we can’t really use that excuse.

Bayern destroyed Barca 7-0 in 2013. If Barca had such a better team than this Real side then how the hell did they have such a heavy defeat. This Real team are no slouches.
 
He has disappeared according to you because the only way a player performs well for you is if he scores goals or/and his team goes through. We won't come to an agreement because I simply have a fundamentally different perspective on football than you and this is why I rate Messi higher (not because I am in some cult or anything like you imply). I never really understood the fuss around pure goal scorers and always rated creators higher. Messi does both and when he had a brillant team around him was the indisputed best player in the world.

The problem is that Messi hasn't created much either in these big CL games, it's not just about the lack of goals. Obviously he shows up in big games too but for the last couple of years he hasn't been doing it nearly enough in the Champions League and he deserves that criticism.

He was bad yesterday, against PSG away last season he was geniunely awful, against Atletico in the past he's been nullified and there are more examples of it. It happens to everyone but for a player of his caliber it shouldn't happen this often.
 
Ahh, so it's gone completely towards Ronaldo in recent weeks... makes sense...
It obviously has with the change in %, what's that got to do with the original point?
 
Ronaldo has had better team mates the last few years though, we can’t really use that excuse.

Bayern destroyed Barca 7-0 in 2013. If Barca had such a better team than this Real side then how the hell did they have such a heavy defeat. This Real team are no slouches.
I'm saying 09 & 11 are balanced with 16 & 17 in terms of the better team-mates argument.

Ronaldo has still out-performed Messi if you look at everything else excluding those 4 seasons.
 
It obviously has with the change in %, what's that got to do with the original point?
I think we need a poll where you can change your votes.

Some people do change their minds, not many.
 
So you're going to compare across eras? Then I stand by that Messi won so much because of Xaviesta.
Why are Barca walking the league without Xavi / Iniesta then? Could it be, because of Messi? Messi is less reliant on others because of his playing style. That's not a praise for him or a criticism of Ronaldo, it's simply evident.

I actually agree with you that Ronaldo is more successful than Messi, but your ridiculous double standardsy way of debating the point makes it utterly impossible to side with you. Even if I accepted Ronaldo as my lord and savior and the 2nd coming of Christ, I would still argue against you.
 
But it goes both ways.
Posters like cal?, yourself are doing it right back. It's like a gang war.

Why can't we just appreciate both....we always have to compare.

We do appreciate both. It’s the certain Messi Fans on here that think Ronaldo doesn’t even compare or he falls in the top 10 footballers at best.
 
Plenty of those on both sides though.

Messi one’s are far more deluded.

Like I said, CR7 has carried his weight even in the past when Madrid have failed and got his share of blame. Barca fail and Messi doesn’t carry his weight / no shows and it’s fine? Yea, no.
 
Why are Barca walking the league without Xavi / Iniesta then? Could it be, because of Messi? Messi is less reliant on others because of his playing style. That's not a praise for him or a criticism of Ronaldo, it's simply evident.

I actually agree with you that Ronaldo is more successful than Messi, but your ridiculous double standardsy way of debating the point makes it utterly impossible to side with you. Even if I accepted Ronaldo as my lord and savior and the 2nd coming of Christ, I would still argue against you.
I've pointed out a few times that Messi has been more consistent in the 17/18 La Liga season.
We do appreciate both. It’s the certain Messi Fans on here that think Ronaldo doesn’t even compare or he falls in the top 10 footballers at best.
Exactly this. I've not seen a single person on the Ronaldo side claim Messi doesn't make the top 10 or he's not as good as Rivaldo or Ronaldinho or other ludicrous statements like that.

The Messi brigade, however, has regularly said those things about Ronaldo.
 
Messi one’s are far more deluded.

Like I said, CR7 has carried his weight even in the past when Madrid have failed and got his share of blame. Barca fail and Messi doesn’t carry his weight / no shows and it’s fine? Yea, no.


It's silly to blame one player for a loss in a team game the same way it is silly to attribute a win solely to one single player. Whoever does that has a very limited understanding of football.
 
I've been following this forum for a couple of years and I just have to say what's on my mind.

It's 2018 and people are still debating about this :lol: It's absolutely hilarious. Especially this Cal? guy. If you have ever kicked a football you can clearly see who the better player is. A player who is 95% reliant on the service he gets from his teammates vs a player who scores as much while being also the best passer and dribbler in the world and playing basically as a midfielder. If you think Cristiano is better, you either haven't watched them play regularly or you don't understand a single thing about football. Why are players like Maradona and Cruyff regarded as much better players than Gerd Muller?

Everyone are laughing at Messi for bottling a 4-1 lead against Roma. If Cristiano had played instead of Messi, he probably wouldn't have even touched the ball. I'm not saying that Messi played well though. But the point is that Cristiano is absolutely useless nowadays if his team isn't able to create chances for him.

Comparing these two is like comparing which amount of money is more; 100 euros or 80 euros.

Claiming Cristiano is the GOAT is so delusional that I'm not even going to say anything about that.

Well, I guess I'm part of the 'Messi brigade' now.


Only the bold sums up the Messi fanatics in this thread and across. They’re not willing to discuss results but it’s just “oh Messi is better because we know about football”

If anything the joke is on you because you think dribbling past players and play making are the only factors to consider when judging a players greatness.

Ronaldo compared to muller again. I guess the likes of rio and saf don’t know shit about footie
 
I’ve traveled to see United at Old Trafford for 16 years. Frankly I have other interests and wouldn’t dream of spending thousands of dollars to watch 2 teams I care little about. If that doesn’t make me a football fan than so be it.
Then I misread. I thought you were saying you enjoyed watching Messi, but weren't bothered to watch Ronaldo. Hard to see how you'd want to watch anyone anywhere if your standards are that finicky.
 
So if it’s silly to blame Messi for the loss can we say Messi is reliant on a good midfield ? (I don’t believe this but I’m responding to the “Ronaldo just relies on service” comments )
 
It's silly to blame one player for a loss in a team game the same way it is silly to attribute a win solely to one single player. Whoever does that has a very limited understanding of football.
That's been done since well before either of them was born.

The sheer number of people who claim Maradona won WC86 on his own. :eek:

When you dominate the competition as much as Ronaldo did in CL 2017, there will be claims that the win was solely down to a player.
 
It's silly to blame one player for a loss in a team game the same way it is silly to attribute a win solely to one single player. Whoever does that has a very limited understanding of football.

Okay but I thought Messi didn’t rely on chances created for him and made his own chances so why should his team matter? I get it that ronaldo is just crespo but Messi has it all right? :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.