Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, all those great Argentinian defenders and midfielders. One better than the other.

Have you seen the Portugal defenders and midfielders? Also remember Messi has been playing world cups since 2006, and he has had a lot of amazing denfenders and midfielders in his team.

Argentina are shit. Literally.

He does show up for them, though, that's another lie. Does he play to the same level he does at Barca? No, but I already said earlier (and you agreed) that Messi and Ronaldo need other top players to bring out their greatness. There's no player at Argentina who's as good as guys like Suarez, Busquets, Alba.

Really? Higuain, Aguero, Di Maria, Lavezzi, Icardi, Dybala, Mascherano, Otamendi?

Lets compare Pepe to Otamendi bud. Oh and do compare Argentina midfield with Portugal one bud.

Of course, compare them! Still no contest.

The fun thing here is that people seem to think Messi has only played with Argentina the last year.

He has been playing with them for more than a decade. He played in 2006, 2010, 2014. Still he hasn't scored even once in 8/9 games of knockout stages.

Also he has played with A LOT of amazing players in Argentina like: Zanetti, Ayala, Heinze, Sorin, Cambiasso, Mascherano, Riquelme, Aimar, Saviola, Crespo, Tevez, Gabriel Milito, Diego Milito, Coloccini, De Michelis, Samuel, Veron, Di Maria, Higuain, Palermo, Aguero, Pastore, Lavezzi, Maxi Rodriguez, Icardi, Dybala, Otamendi, etc...

Are people seriously saying the players he has played with Argentina are crap and that is why he can't win a WC? For real???
 
They’re as even as can be with trophies, goals and all that. What separates them for me is style of play. I don’t like Barcelona but I watch their games just to watch Messi. I’ve paid money and travelled to go see a friendly between Argentina and Brazil solely so I can watch Messi play. I wouldn’t do that for Ronaldo.
Weird. I traveled from the US to see Everton play Spurs and to see Fulham play (in addition to watching Utd at Old Trafford). How can you possibly be a football fan, and only interested in seeing one player?
 
Exactly. The Ronaldo fans have created this alternate universe where only the CL matters. Conveniently in the same season where RM have gave up in the league because they were so awful in the half of the season and have instead focused on the CL.

And I don't care how many CL's, Ballon d'Or's or whatever Ronaldo wins. I'll never see him as being better than Messi simply because I think Messi is a better player than him. I use the eye test to judge who's better not how many awards or trophies they have.

Both all time greats but I'll never be swayed on accolades. I think that would make watching football so joyless.

That's bordering on one of those alternate league table theories. On a serious note, if you're going to use an eye test then you admit that the only argument you're going to bring forth to this debate is "Messi is better because I can see he is better". So why contribute to this thread? At lease some of use are using trophies, stats and achievements to judge them (from both Messi and Ronaldo's side)
 
“Last time Messi scored a champions league quarter final goal Cryuff was alive, Real Madrid had 9 Champions League titles and Ronaldo had 1 Ballon dor.”

Is this correct?!
 
Weird. I traveled from the US to see Everton play Spurs and to see Fulham play (in addition to watching Utd at Old Trafford). How can you possibly be a football fan, and only interested in seeing one player?

Eh - it'd be weird if you literally constantly followed that player around all the time, but if I either lived in Spain or happened to be in Spain at around the time of an El Clasico, for example, I'd probably try to nab some tickets, partly in the knowledge you'd be getting the opportunity to watch two of the games greats and a whole host of other future legends.
 
That's bordering on one of those alternate league table theories. On a serious note, if you're going to use an eye test then you admit that the only argument you're going to bring forth to this debate is "Messi is better because I can see he is better". So why contribute to this thread? At lease some of use are using trophies, stats and achievements to judge them (from both Messi and Ronaldo's side)

Obviously stats, trophies and individual honours tell you a lot about a player, but he's making a fair point that you can additionally assess a player on how you judge their individual qualities on the ball to be, or how good you judge their overall game to be. Anyone who watches a ton of football or who's knowledgeable on the game will potentially have some opinions as to players they feel are underrated or don't get enough praise, and to the contrary they'll have players who they feel are overhyped. In this case, most people arguing Messi is better than Ronaldo are arguing that in spite of their very similar records in most facets of the game, they feel Messi has that bit extra in regards to his skill on the ball etc.

Ballon D'Ors are obviously a key measure as to how good someone is but it's possible to disagree with their conclusion in a certain year. Michael Owen has one but I'd imagine most people would agree there are a ton of players from that era who were better than him but didn't win one.
 
Weird. I traveled from the US to see Everton play Spurs and to see Fulham play (in addition to watching Utd at Old Trafford). How can you possibly be a football fan, and only interested in seeing one player?

I’ve traveled to see United at Old Trafford for 16 years. Frankly I have other interests and wouldn’t dream of spending thousands of dollars to watch 2 teams I care little about. If that doesn’t make me a football fan than so be it.
 
Obviously stats, trophies and individual honours tell you a lot about a player, but he's making a fair point that you can additionally assess a player on how you judge their individual qualities on the ball to be, or how good you judge their overall game to be. Anyone who watches a ton of football or who's knowledgeable on the game will potentially have some opinions as to players they feel are underrated or don't get enough praise, and to the contrary they'll have players who they feel are overhyped. In this case, most people arguing Messi is better than Ronaldo are arguing that in spite of their very similar records in most facets of the game, they feel Messi has that bit extra in regards to his skill on the ball etc.

Ballon D'Ors are obviously a key measure as to how good someone is but it's possible to disagree with their conclusion in a certain year. Michael Owen has one but I'd imagine most people would agree there are a ton of players from that era who were better than him but didn't win one.

Okay but he said that no matter how many Ballon D'ors/trophies Ronaldo wins it wouldn't change his opinion and that is just silly. If Messi had 1 Ballon Do'r and only 2 league titles to his name and you still thought he was the greater player it would make no sense.

The fact that they are both pretty much equal with achievements gives a good baseline to judge who is greater and bring in what yous see on the pitch but if you're going to say that Ronaldo wont be the greater player even if he wins the coming world cup and 4 more Ballon D'ors then what is the point of even discussing it?
 
30581429_1903763396315003_6170205847421796325_n.jpg

Good night and sleep well ;)
 
The difference is that Messi could play in any era.

Ronaldo is thriving in the era of zonal defending. The defensive line shifts together and leaves these blank spots in the box for the 'fox' to score. Whenever a player stops at a dime, the defensive line keeps running together and they are free.

Ronaldo being harassed by someone, hip checked, pushed and being dealt physically. I'd like to see that. He rarely has to grapple someone physically.
Ronaldo in the Serie A would be another Djorkaeff, a good player but nothing to write home about.
I'm sorry you think that way.
 
That's bordering on one of those alternate league table theories. On a serious note, if you're going to use an eye test then you admit that the only argument you're going to bring forth to this debate is "Messi is better because I can see he is better". So why contribute to this thread? At lease some of use are using trophies, stats and achievements to judge them (from both Messi and Ronaldo's side)

Is it really so ridiculous and outlandish to use the eye test to determine who is a better footballer?

For me stuff like trophies and achievements determine greatness in terms of a legacy not who is simply better at playing football.
 
I always like reasoned debate, and understand where you are coming from to an extent (it's a game where goals are the ultimate arbiter, after all).

But before one can score a goal, many other things have to be in place, but I made no comment about penalties and Chelsea so you may be confusing me with another poster.

Yes, I saw Rivaldo live in both Manchester and Barcelona (a few times), and also very much remember the dreadful way Van Gaal used both him and another of my favourites Riquelme, but that's another story. Think of how relatively bad that Barca side was and how Rivaldo essentially carried it for 2 seasons (they had a party when they finished 4th!). I don't see CR ever playing as selflessly as Rivaldo did for Barca at that time.

Well, there was a slight ironic lead-up to my posting the article with Rivaldo's stats, but I understand that humour doesn't translate well on the page sometimes - the utter ridiculousness of thinking that statistics can lead to truly objective assessments about human beings' endeavours (see various Labour Party 'target-driven' policies in the UK over the late 90s and 2000s) is the point I'm driving at and this is the very thing that many CR fans seem to cling to rather too vehemently.

I completely understand not being an aesthete in competitive sports, but how a team wins games is more complex than scoring goals. There's a reason that Kroos and Modric complained about the way the team seemed to be set-up for Ronaldo to score goals but it was effective. It's here where I feel many Ronaldo fans begin to lose the concept of a player in a team game and that's why Ronaldo will be considered more like Gerd Muller than Johan Cruyff in years to come. That still doesn't stop him being an amazing player, and that's what you should enjoy - it's nothing but a entertaining meaningless diversion, after all...

You seem to value Keane's opinion a lot. Here's one of them for you on Cristiano Ronaldo...

"'The guy is a genius, it's a simple as that," Keane said on ITV. "You are talking about one of the greatest players ever to play this GAME. He is a joy to watch.'"

You think highly of that Alex Ferguson guy or nah? Know of him? Coached a certain club some here might have heard of. Well anyway, this bloke Ferguson, the one with a career so storied that he's considered the best manger of all time by many, he's repeated on numerous occasions that Cristiano Ronaldo is the best player he's managed. And he's stated it so many times, in such manners and for so many years now that it's clearly beyond any doubt in his mind. Get this, he's even rated him ahead of Messi on many occasions, including when he wasn't even managing him! Must be a biased bugger though.

Here's some statistics (Sorry, I know of your aversion to facts from your previous post) for you that, while concerning Ronaldo, are team-based. Ronaldo, the player you state is so selfish he apparently negatively impacts his teammates, the same players (like Keane, a former teammate) that have continuously spoken only the best things about him. Keane, who also stated that he liked Ronaldo STRAIGHT AWAY when he entered the Man. United locker room because of how he led himself. Wanna know why Keane's opinion of Ronaldo differs from yours? Because how Ronaldo approaches LIFE is admirable to his teammates. Even someone like Roy Keane who ripped his national team manager in 2002 in such a manner that it was described as 'clinical, fierce, earth-shattering to the person on the end of it'. Roy Keane, the guy who stated he's always liked Ronaldo from the moment he met him, the one passionate about football but opting to choose personal principals in relation to what he thought of his manager over competing in Korea/Japan. It INSPIRES Ronaldo's teammates to see someone so dedicated and driven to make the absolute best of what God has given him. You seem to like footballer's quotes a lot, go take a look at how many of them have only spoken the utmost of the 'selfish' man that defended his much maligned teammate (Benzema) against his own fans. The 'selfish' player that thought it more important to get said teammate's confidence up by giving him the opportunity to take a penalty recently, rather than scoring it himself and getting a hat trick. Pretty selfish stuff from the person who has also done all sorts of charity work by his own volition as soon as he had enough money to significantly do it. A real despicable person on and off the field. Clearly.

Sorry, here's those FACTS...Ronaldo has been instrumental in more Champions League triumphs than Messi (4 to 3). Here's another. Cristiano Ronaldo captained Portugal to their only international triumph, in a tournament where they'd have crashed out of the group stages if not for his efforts. Messi can't even win the Copa America, the tournament that Ronaldinho and Kaka thought less worthy of their time than the beaches of Rio during their careers. Get this... Ronaldo's TEAMS, because of Ronaldo, have achieved more important trophies than Messi's have because of Messi. Ronaldo led his team to back-to-back Champions League triumphs, an unprecedented feat that Messi's Barcelona couldn't do, because of Ronaldo's performances against 3 of the top clubs in Europe. Know why it was unprecedented? because the champions league is the toughest competition in the entire history of the sport. Hat tricks against Bayern and Atletico, then slicing and dicing the 'impregnable' defense of Juventus for fun. I know you're too good for this thread and probably won't reply but if you do, please try not to argue that Messi's La Liga wins (a competition to to prove the best team in Spain) are more important than Ronaldo leading his clubs and national team to the summit of European football. The former (Spain) is a geography that makes up part of a MUCH BIGGER ONE. That means higher levels of competition in one relative to the other. much higher. and if you haven't caught on yet... competitiveness = difficulty. you can judge a player to be better than the other because of the talent he was born with but life, and the world, always finds a way to honor and respect what really matters. achievement. Understand that and you'll understand why this debate did not end when Messi won his 4th Ballon D'Or, why this thread exists and why you're posting in it.

Ronaldo's efforts have resulted in his TEAMS... get ready for this.... ACHIEVING MORE IMPORTANT VICTORIES than Messi's. Wanna know why Messi's peak came during the Great Spain years of 2008-2012... BECAUSE HE NEEDED THEM TO GET THERE. Ronaldo needs himself ONLY. It why he wins EVERYWHERE. ALWAYS. And, against ANYONE. It is why he led THREE teams to the TOP OF EUROPE. Go ahead and take a look at where Portugal, Real Madrid and Manchester United were when he entered each teams and then compare to where he took them. Go see how close each were to being European Champions when he entered those teams. Go take a look at how many finals Portugal has been to, and then check the preceding semi-final of each respective final. Tell me who scored the first goal in each of those semi-finals that led to their only final appearances in history. Go compare Portugal's appearances in tournaments and their respective performances Before and After Ronaldo. Tell me what you see. After that, go take a look at Player Ratings from the Portugal vs. France World Cup 2006 semi-final (there's many of them still available... yay Internet!). Let me know what you see. Hint: Ronaldo was voted by many not only the best Portuguese player, but the BEST PLAYER ON THE FIELD. Against Zidane's France playing in a team with Figo, Deco, etc. etc. In a game that, like in '66, was the farthest his national team had ever gotten in the most important national team competition there is. A game where, like in the 2009 Champions League final, it was his teammates that didn't match his level of effort and influence. Nah, you don't want to do that research. Someone so assured in what they say doesn't want their mind changed. Those pesky statistics (FACTS) that are grounded in reality tend to change people's uninformed opinions. You're clearly not interested in that. You're an old guy apparently so you know everything!

It's why you ask for demographics of people who defend Ronaldo. You seem to like to talk down to others from the high spot you imagine yourself to be on, and assume anyone that doesn't agree with you is because they're younger and therefore too juvenile to understand your unquestionable logic that you yourself proudly (and sadly) state isn't based on FACTS. Apparently not old enough to know what an ad-hominem is. You don't want to debate rationally. You want to debase arguments not on the merit of the argument themselves, but those that make said arguments. Better to stick to your fingers in your ears and tell yourself you're right and that you won't bother wasting your time in this senseless debate again. But you stated that in your first post, yet here I am replying to your second post in this thread. And looks like that second wasn't your last.

Keane stated Xavi is on the level of Zidane huh... Zidane, that player who has stated just within the past week or so that CR7 is from another galaxy? Wanna know why he said that? It isn't just because he's his coach, although I'm sure you want to think that is the only reason. You'll clearly avoid considering anything that could destroy your opinion of CR7 and won't bother asking yourself how many coaches, particularly a legend like Zidane, have even said such a thing about another player not named Messi. Zidane said it because he KNOWS how tough it is to do what Cristiano Ronaldo has done. He KNOWS how tough it is to play in a competition like the Champions Leauge, a competition where Ronaldo will NEVER be surpassed in goals because the only person capable of surpassing him (Messi) sees the distance grow larger and larger with each passing year. A competition where he has outscored messi, your 'eye' test victor, forty (40) to sixteen (16) in the most difficult stages of the most difficult competition in the sport's history, during it's most competitive period. How's those FACTS doing with your 'eye'? How about your brain?

Congratulations, you're old enough to have watched Rivaldo play. Now try to realize why even the most ardent of Barca supporters (check out CR7's forum on Barcaforum.com) would read "Rivaldo > CR7" and then laugh at such a stupid and ludicrous statement. Try and figure out why Cristiano Ronaldo is listed in every All-Time Starting XI for clubs like Real Madrid and Manchester United and why Rivaldo doesn't make most's Barca All-Time XI and why he played for Deportivo at an age Ronaldo had already LED Manchester United to a Champions League title. I don't think you're going to like the answer. I'll give you another hint: The answer is NOT that Rivaldo is the better footballer.

But it's your opinion that he is a better footballer than Ronaldo, and you're free to have it, even if it's wrong as far as opinions can be wrong. I'll let you know something you are wrongabout though. when you stated in your initial post that football can't be spoken of in the same breath as statistics because it's more 'nuanced' than other sports. do you understand how football became a global game? how it became the biggest sport this world has seen or ever will see? it's because it's simple. it's the opposite of nuanced. It involves a ball, and putting said ball in your opponent's net more times than they put it in yours. THAT'S IT. Football is clearly too big of a part of your life for you to see that it's nothing more than a GAME. Like Monopoly, Jenga, or Chess. But more entertaining and requiring some more athleticism. You should change your perspective on to where you realize football is a JUST A GAME, where a game is a very defined thing despite what Arrigo Sacchi recently stated. Trust me, the view is better from that side. IMO, at least.

Cheers.
 
I have been reading ridiculous posts from you for the last couple of days, so I put up a joke comment because some of you lot have been ridiculous with the comments.



Did you watch the two legs vs Chelsea? Messi carried Barca through. He can’t carry them every game, especially when they are quite poor without him. They would not be top of La Liga by a landslide if he didn’t play for them.

Even Ronaldo needs his team mates to help out, more so than Messi actually. Ronaldo has briliant timing and finishing, but if Modric, Isco, Bale, Benzema didn’t provide for him he wouldn’t be able to do what he does as good.

Put him in this Barca team and no way does he do any better than Messi. Because Ron can’t pick the ball up from deep and take it to the other team. That is what Barca are expecting from Messi every game.



Please behave. How many times have you watched Barcelona play this season? Answer truthfully.

Messi has been the main reason Barca are so far ahead at the top of the League. He has won way more games for his team than Ronaldo has this season. Just because Ronaldo is better in 5 games in the CL doesn’t mean he has been better than Messi.

Otherwise why are Real so far behind in the league?

As for Salah, he won’t win any trophy with Liverpool this season. So how can he win the Ballon D’or vs someone who is the main reason for his team winning the league.
I haven't been on here for days besides to comment on the current drama at Sporting so besides that idk what ridiculous posts I am talking about. If you mean today then its maybe because you and others don't like to hear true things. With that being said I am done with this topic as this was hours Ago.
 
The difference is that Messi could play in any era.

Ronaldo is thriving in the era of zonal defending. The defensive line shifts together and leaves these blank spots in the box for the 'fox' to score. Whenever a player stops at a dime, the defensive line keeps running together and they are free.

Ronaldo being harassed by someone, hip checked, pushed and being dealt physically. I'd like to see that. He rarely has to grapple someone physically.
Ronaldo in the Serie A would be another Djorkaeff, a good player but nothing to write home about.

wow :lol::lol::lol:
 
The difference is that Messi could play in any era.

Ronaldo is thriving in the era of zonal defending. The defensive line shifts together and leaves these blank spots in the box for the 'fox' to score. Whenever a player stops at a dime, the defensive line keeps running together and they are free.

Ronaldo being harassed by someone, hip checked, pushed and being dealt physically. I'd like to see that. He rarely has to grapple someone physically.
Ronaldo in the Serie A would be another Djorkaeff, a good player but nothing to write home about.

If it's so fecking simple it's a mystery how teams don't just go out and completely nullify Ronaldo more often. In fact, Ronaldo routinely goes out and shits on any defence put in front of him.

If only they read the posts of tactical mastermind bebeanderson on Redcafé, huh?
 
No, they are putting Ronaldo on top because he has won 3 of the last 4 UCL, because he has won 4 of the last 5 Ballon D'Ors, he won the 2 FIFA Best Player, the last season he won 5 out of 6 tournaments they played, he has been the top scorer in UCL the last 7 years in a row, and because Messi has disappeared in 4 of the last 5 UCL.

He dissapeared twice vs Atletico, once vs Juve, PSG, Roma, Bayern... while Cristiano always appears in the big games.

You only need to see their stats in the knockout stages on the UCL and suddenly everything becomes very clear.
Of course the CL makes for one sided reading. My point was that just because it is the competition that is taken into consideration most when deciding those trophies and the one that most neutral fans would watch on a regular basis, does not necessarily make a higher indicator of quality over a league campaign. Real Madrid have been as good as hibernating this year, they are fresher and sharper than everyone else come March/April. They have done the same on more than a few of the past few seasons and a lot of the time it was because Barcelona and Messi have been consistently performing week in week out in the league. Does it excuse Barcelona and Messi under achieving in the big CL games? Of course not, several teams including them managed to do well on all fronts. But is it fair to write off their and Messi's performances week in week out as though they are less relevant than Real Madrid and Ronaldo basically saving themselves for this period? I am not so sure, at least I think it is worth considering before jumping to conclusions.

Basically what I am saying, in this period you are talking about, Ronaldo won the league once! He won it twice in 10 years. To write that off as merely a small detail in favor of knockout CL games vs the guy who has been mostly performing week in week out seems like cherry picking the criteria on which to evaluate.
 
Of course the CL makes for one sided reading. My point was that just because it is the competition that is taken into consideration most when deciding those trophies and the one that most neutral fans would watch on a regular basis, does not necessarily make a higher indicator of quality over a league campaign. Real Madrid have been as good as hibernating this year, they are fresher and sharper than everyone else come March/April. They have done the same on more than a few of the past few seasons and a lot of the time it was because Barcelona and Messi have been consistently performing week in week out in the league. Does it excuse Barcelona and Messi under achieving in the big CL games? Of course not, several teams including them managed to do well on all fronts. But is it fair to write off their and Messi's performances week in week out as though they are less relevant than Real Madrid and Ronaldo basically saving themselves for this period? I am not so sure, at least I think it is worth considering before jumping to conclusions.

Basically what I am saying, in this period you are talking about, Ronaldo won the league once! He won it twice in 10 years. To write that off as merely a small detail in favor of knockout CL games vs the guy who has been mostly performing week in week out seems like cherry picking the criteria on which to evaluate.

Ronaldo's won 3 leagues in the past 10 years, 5 in the last 12. They didn't win in 2013/14 because he got injured and Madrid lost a bunch of titles by just 1 or 2 points.

League performances matter a lot obviously and they shouldn't be written off, but CL performances matter a lot more.
 
Ronaldo's won 3 leagues in the past 10 years, 5 in the last 12. They didn't win in 2013/14 because he got injured and Madrid lost a bunch of titles by just 1 or 2 points.

League performances matter a lot obviously and they shouldn't be written off, but CL performances matter a lot more.
I am counting this year when I write 2 out of 10 as I am sure you do not expect Real will win it. I am not sure what are you basing this CL should matter more on. I personally cannot really decide as I think both have some unique merits. The CL pins you in very high tense situations where the margin of error is minimal. It also pins you against the very best most of the time. The league however tests every single week especially somewhere like Spain where the big two barely every drop points. When both were competing for the league week in week out and Real would come up short by a few points, I can see why the CL would be a reliable indicator. But when Real basically stop playing by Christmas resting their best players before every big game AC Milan style 10 years ago, I am just not sure how can it be fair to call them or their best players better than a team that has been outperforming them on a weekly basis for 10 months.
 
Would be funny if Juventus beats real for 4-9 :lol:
This guy Roncero would destroy the Messi brigade in this thread, its just embarassing the amount of excuses always for Guardiola and Messi compared with Cristiano or Mourinho, I am not a huge fan of both but I like to see the Pepistas and Messistas double standards. Football won today.
 
Ronaldo's won 3 leagues in the past 10 years, 5 in the last 12. They didn't win in 2013/14 because he got injured and Madrid lost a bunch of titles by just 1 or 2 points.

League performances matter a lot obviously and they shouldn't be written off, but CL performances matter a lot more.

Also something to remember is that Ronaldo would've had a lot more if he stayed at United. We lost the 09/10 title to Chelsea by 1 point, won the 10/11 title, finished on the same points as City in 11/12, and then won the 12/13 title. That he went to compete against one of the best teams ever in Barca - in a Real team that at the time in 2009 wasn't great - was either brave from him or a bit naive, but obviously now paying off that the team has improved.
 
I am counting this year when I write 2 out of 10 as I am sure you do not expect Real will win it.

If you count this year it's 3 out of 10. If you don't count this year, it's 4 out of 10. Not an ideal record and Madrid should have won it in 2013/14 but it's good nevertheless.

I am not sure what are you basing this CL should matter more on. I personally cannot really decide as I think both have some unique merits. The CL pins you in very high tense situations where the margin of error is minimal. It also pins you against the very best most of the time. The league however tests every single week especially somewhere like Spain where the big two barely every drop points. When both were competing for the league week in week out and Real would come up short by a few points, I can see why the CL would be a reliable indicator. But when Real basically stop playing by Christmas resting their best players before every big game AC Milan style 10 years ago, I am just not sure how can it be fair to call them or their best players better than a team that has been outperforming them on a weekly basis for 10 months.

By it being by far the more prestigious competition? Not sure I'm understanding what you're saying.
 
Why don't you just enjoy both players?

I definitely do. I genuinely admit/say Messi is the most talented footballer ever.

Doesn’t mean I can’t dish out what the Messi fanbois have served to Ronaldo over the years. Fair play don’t you think? A bit obnoxious sure but it’s definitely a 2way road and I’m just giving it back to those deluded homers who exonerate Messi of any ounce of blame.


EDIT - and I hate/love when Messi does something propelling him ahead of Ronaldo and the homers shit on a Cristiano and say don’t even dare mention him along Messi. But when Messi chokes/CR7 propelled ahead they say “just enjoy them both”. Oh I do, I’m dishing out some karma is all hahah
 
Messi seriously looked like he didn't cared last night.
He played like that boyfriend who enjoys his gf getting banged by other dudes.
Ridiculous game by him and Barcelona yesterday, they looked like championship side. They were hoofing and losing ball, misplacing passes, it was so unlike Barcelona.
 
I definitely do. I genuinely admit/say Messi is the most talented footballer ever.

Doesn’t mean I can’t dish out what the Messi fanbois have served to Ronaldo over the years. Fair play don’t you think? A bit obnoxious sure but it’s definitely a 2way road and I’m just giving it back to those deluded homers who exonerate Messi of any ounce of blame.


EDIT - and I hate/love when Messi does something propelling him ahead of Ronaldo and the homers shit on a Cristiano and say don’t even dare mention him along Messi. But when Messi chokes/CR7 propelled ahead they say “just enjoy them both”. Oh I do, I’m dishing out some karma is all hahah
But it goes both ways.
Posters like cal?, yourself are doing it right back. It's like a gang war.

Why can't we just appreciate both....we always have to compare.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Messi seriously looked like he didn't cared last night.
He played like that boyfriend who enjoys his gf getting banged by other dudes.
Ridiculous game by him and Barcelona yesterday, they looked like championship side. They were hoofing and losing ball, misplacing passes, it was so unlike Barcelona.

They lost the midfield battle, Suarez can't run or get involved in any link up play and their defence were either hell bent on putting themselves under pressure by passing it around the back or hoofing it forward to their (apparent) big target man up front.

Of all the games to lay blame at Messi's feet, this wasn't one of them. He could done a bit more sure, but put Ronaldo in that side last night and it's the same story. If Real draw them I'm quite confident Modric, Kroos, Casemeiro, Marcelo and Carvajal won't be bullied the way those Barcelona players were last night. How many chances did they fashion until Dembele came on?

Valverde must surely be sacked after that. They could go unbeaten in the league and he'd still warrent it. Ridden his luck alot this season with a serious over reliance on Messi, last night that luck ran out and he was shown up big time by Di Francesco.
 
:lol:

You just know after what he's doing here next time Ronaldo has a bad game and Madrid lose a match, this and Ronaldo's thread is going to be full by the hundreds now
Anyway despite your tagline it's nice to talk to you. :)
 
Have you seen the Portugal defenders and midfielders? Also remember Messi has been playing world cups since 2006, and he has had a lot of amazing denfenders and midfielders in his team.



Really? Higuain, Aguero, Di Maria, Lavezzi, Icardi, Dybala, Mascherano, Otamendi?



Of course, compare them! Still no contest.

The fun thing here is that people seem to think Messi has only played with Argentina the last year.

He has been playing with them for more than a decade. He played in 2006, 2010, 2014. Still he hasn't scored even once in 8/9 games of knockout stages.

Also he has played with A LOT of amazing players in Argentina like: Zanetti, Ayala, Heinze, Sorin, Cambiasso, Mascherano, Riquelme, Aimar, Saviola, Crespo, Tevez, Gabriel Milito, Diego Milito, Coloccini, De Michelis, Samuel, Veron, Di Maria, Higuain, Palermo, Aguero, Pastore, Lavezzi, Maxi Rodriguez, Icardi, Dybala, Otamendi, etc...

Are people seriously saying the players he has played with Argentina are crap and that is why he can't win a WC? For real???
Who's saying that?
 
Na, Messi has still been unreal this season. If they get a player 38 lost 0 in the league it’s unique enough to keep him in the hunt.
The Ballon D'or is awarded for the calendar year, what happened in Sep-Dec 2017 should have NOTHING to do with the award.
 
“Last time Messi scored a champions league quarter final goal Cryuff was alive, Real Madrid had 9 Champions League titles and Ronaldo had 1 Ballon dor.”

Is this correct?!
That is correct. :lol:

But he does have 2 SF goals from 2015.
 
I've been following this forum for a couple of years and I just have to say what's on my mind.

It's 2018 and people are still debating about this :lol: It's absolutely hilarious. Especially this Cal? guy. If you have ever kicked a football you can clearly see who the better player is. A player who is 95% reliant on the service he gets from his teammates vs a player who scores as much while being also the best passer and dribbler in the world and playing basically as a midfielder. If you think Cristiano is better, you either haven't watched them play regularly or you don't understand a single thing about football. Why are players like Maradona and Cruyff regarded as much better players than Gerd Muller?

Everyone are laughing at Messi for bottling a 4-1 lead against Roma. If Cristiano had played instead of Messi, he probably wouldn't have even touched the ball. I'm not saying that Messi played well though. But the point is that Cristiano is absolutely useless nowadays if his team isn't able to create chances for him.

Comparing these two is like comparing which amount of money is more; 100 euros or 80 euros.

Claiming Cristiano is the GOAT is so delusional that I'm not even going to say anything about that.

Well, I guess I'm part of the 'Messi brigade' now.
 
The Ballon D'or is awarded for the calendar year, what happened in Sep-Dec 2017 should have NOTHING to do with the award.

It shouldn't but it does. In fact the sole reason Ronaldo is tied with Messi on the Balon Dor's is because of this. In 2013, Ronaldo won the Balon Dor but Messi had won the league that year scoring 46 goals. Neither him or Ronaldo won the CL and neither of them had an international tournament.

Nov 15, 2013 - Deadline for Voting
Nov 19, 2013 - Ronaldo scores a hat-trick in KO game to take Portugal to the world cup. Argentina had already qualified.
Nov 20, 2013 - Fifa extend the voting for Balon Dor until 29th of November. Saying that they didn't get enough votes back. And they even allowed the people who voted before the 15th to change their votes to take account "recent" performances.

The extension only favoured one person, and with the hat trick fresh on peoples minds...
 
Surely given current form at the business end of the season and IF Madrid win the CL, then Ronaldo is favorite for Ballon D'or number 6?

Absolutely incredible considering he was wrote off by so many only before Christmas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.