Mister_Stubbs
New Member
A very popular Queen song comes to mind.
we are shit at transfers thats what happened, woodward is useless and the glazers are tossers
Huh?
I honestly think its our greedy owners who wont part with the cash!How hard is it to understand that Benatia will cost €35m+?
All Ed has to do is bid €35m...it isnt rocket science!
This is crazy man.
A very popular Queen song comes to mind.
Seven seas of Rhye?
That's the one yes.
I know what it says, just wondering if it true or not.http://translate.googleusercontent....9.html&usg=ALkJrhg2cM8BkMKoIrtUvT2dO357ONoKSA
There's more context in these last two articles that I posted, I can only hope we are not really interested and still in the frame
I honestly think its our greedy owners who wont part with the cash!
That makes no sense they would sanction deals for Shaw and Herrera that cost more money, 35m isnt that much for a top tier CB in todays market....david luiz cost 50m!
Also if they are so greedy then surely they want to make more money not less therefore it stands to reason they will invest into their product to ensure it is competitive with the best in the world.
Exactly, common sense dictates that they are prepared to financially back the club when it comes to transfers....ed must be the roadblock.
Exactly, common sense dictates that they are prepared to financially back the club when it comes to transfers....ed must be the roadblock.
The last 7 years tells me otherwise.
Their product was one of the best in the world prior to this, they did not invest.
Their product is no longer one of the best in the world, they will invest.
When it suits you the Glazers are greedy businessman but now it does not suit you they are not business like at all because a businessman would understand in order to multiply his cash he must invest.
If we are to accept they want more deals like that Adidas one so they can be even more wealthy then how can we also accept they are willing to neglect their product so they make less money?
I'm confused...
I'm hoping Louis van Gaal wanted to assess some more players back in England before giving the green light.
This game just gone seemed to be an audition for Fellaini and also for Januzaj to show what he can do since 4-2-1-3 will be on his mind if 3-5-2 doesn't work out.
I would be surprised if Di Maria does not move clubs due to how stacked Real Madrid are and also I would be surprised if Louis van Gaal was not interested.
The last 7 years (even longer actually) tells me otherwise.
By all reports SAF was very much against big money transfers , hence the "no value in the market" line
So you reckon we actually have all this money to splash and its just the fact the Ed can't close the deals? Ok... When you are a negotiator with unlimited funds you don't have any issues closing deals, you have a problem when your hands are tied.
How hard is it to buy players when money is no object, lets be real
Or maybe he was covering for the owners.
So against big money transfers he spent £30m+ on Berbatov
You understand little about business.
I am saying in business you do not throw cash around like a child, you invest wisely. Offering £100m for Vidal is unwise for instance
Yeah I won't respond much further, if you think it is normal for a business person to say right I value this thing here at £40m but I want to give instead for it £150m, if you think that's the way to go then may god help you.
In this instance if we do not at least invest in those players, United's stock will continue to drop and it will cost more in the long run.
In this instance if we do not at least invest in those players, United's stock will continue to drop and it will cost more in the long run.
You understand little about business.
I am saying in business you do not throw cash around like a child, you invest wisely. Offering £100m for Vidal is unwise for instance
Yeah I won't respond much further, if you think it is normal for a business person to say right I value this thing here at £40m but I want to give instead for it £150m, if you think that's the way to go then may god help you.
He said the owners backed him.
Go on, call him a liar, call him a yes man.
Huh?
I doubt you think we should pay £150m for either Di Maria or Vidal.
We should have a price and be willing to go slightly over this valuation due to the special circumstances since it will save us money in the long run. What we should not do is simply splash out like the other poster suggested, I would not make Vidal the most expensive player in the world because he isn't worth £90m to us.
I'm not saying it all ends with this guy, but in term of quality and top class potential who else is available?
I couldn't come up with any name. The way I look at it if we aren't interested in top tier players and just want to have another season of low expectations and hoping/aiming for top four finish we might as well stick with what we've got and give the kids a run this year.
He said a lot of things that are untrue, doesn't make him a liar, but to say he has never told a lie in his career especially when is was for the greater good is silly.
Or lets look at it from another angle, he just sold arguably the second best player in the world (if not the best) for £80m and replaced him with Valencia and didn't invest the rest of the money into the squad (when we clearly had CM issues)
He did this because he thought it was the best thing to do, nothing to do with trying to keep the club finances intact.
Thats not even what I am saying though is it? You are saying the Glazers are not the issue and that the problem is Ed, they are willing to invest but he can't do his job.
The value of a player is not only what his market value is, but what the player is worth to you.
Was Bale's market value £85m? No probably not but that what it took to get him out of Spurs.
Who said anything about offering £100m for Vidal, lets say we want Vidal and he wants to come to us and Juve have a price, what is stopping the deal?
Eds incompetence or the club as a whole not willing to meet Juves valuation, given past events I will go with the latter.
That's what I wanted to know, if he's his agent or not. Thanks.If you ask for translation; exclusiv visit @FCBayern: A.Wacker went to boss Rummenigge part of the talk was Benatia then the name of the channel and show they had the stuff on.
He is the so called "agent" of Benatia. He will have something to do with him. Sport1 wouldnt go so far without that fact.
You are putting words into my mouth, well done noob.
Show me where I said that.
On the Vidal point, if their price is about £100m, you are once again implying we should pay it
What is stopping the deal? It's a bad investment, how do you not understand this?
Yeah Ed is incompetent because he won't pay £100m for Vidal
So many clubs chasing CB's this summer and they all somehow managed to let Garay go to Russia cut price.
Still don't get it.