Amsterdam Devil
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2021
- Messages
- 1,122
Only if they get CL again I think.The transfer fee is irrelevant. I really don't see Rashford agreeing to join them long term.
Only if they get CL again I think.The transfer fee is irrelevant. I really don't see Rashford agreeing to join them long term.
If £40m is an insult then why isn't anyone rushing to pay us it? Pretty sure we'd accept significantly less right now.70% is ok, 40m is almost an insult. 60m minimum in the current market.
Lingard didn’t have even an option if I recall. We know he was never turning it around here, so we either take the 40m and run, or he comes back and we take a bit less to get him gone. I’m fine with either, what I don’t want to see is ‘well he scored 5 goals, there’s a player in there somewhere.’We aren’t cutting and running though - that would be if Villa had an obligation to buy. An option for Villa means that we lose all control - he has a Lingard like loan and we don’t get the benefit of other clubs being interested. He is awful and Villa don’t exercise it anyway.
Because his wages and the the likelihood they've sounded him out and he's not keen on the interested club.If £40m is an insult then why isn't anyone rushing to pay us it? Pretty sure we'd accept significantly less right now.
Wow, no kidding.75% of wages and 40 mil buy option is not a bad deal for Utd. It is a gamble for Villa but is a loan primarly.
Exactly so £40m is too much for him.Because his wages and the the likelihood they've sounded him out and he's not keen on the interested club.
I’m tempted to say what I really feel. Best say nothingJust feel really sad at how it's turned out with him this season. He should have achieved so much more at our club. I hope he can rediscover his form and his passion for the game at Villa -- and hopefully returns to United as a revitalised footballer.
United are never going to get £60m for him given the wages he’s on, never mind the form he’s in.
75% of wages and 40 mil buy option is not a bad deal for Utd. It is a gamble for Villa but is a loan primarly.
Yes I agree in an ideal world. But i am proposing a salary cap in football in general not just at United, because if we don’t pay a certain figure, then another club will.I don't think we need a salary cap. We need to stop making stupid decisions at boardroom level. There are a lot of instances of players being offered wages they failed to justify at United. Somebody in negotiations needs to be willing to say 'No, sorry but we don't think that amount is justified. If that's your position it' ll be neccesary for you to leave if you choose not to take the offer'. Bayern do it all the time.
Drinking after matches is a professionalism issue though, whereas wearing ostentatious clothing is more veering between irrelevancy and general bellendry.Really?
I thought that's the kind of thing often said about people - you can get away with X when you're delivering results and it's not seen as effecting your performance or professional commitment; but as soon as those performances regularly dip, it becomes an issue and you can't get away with it.
I thought that was said by professionals when Rashford has been out on the drink after United defeats - it's not great either way, but you can get away with it more if you've just had a great game and your team won; if you're playing badly and you've just lost, then it's a really terrible look.
Same kind of thing seems to be applied to other forms of flash lifestyle while performing poorly on the pitch - especially when seemingly giving little effort, and having your professionalism questioned by your managers. It all starts to add up to a seeming poor sense of priorities and lack of professional commitment.
but the attitude between them is so different, although Rooney was degradded but he was still giving his 100% in the pitch..Rashford definitely has an issue with application but there's a part of me that thinks his body isn't up to it anymore.
Yes he's only 27 but he started so young he's almost played the same number of matches most players play in their entire careers. Somewhat reminiscent of Rooney who peaked in his early 20s and was looking pretty washed by 28.
If he has a good rest of season, there will be no shortage of suitors for that quoted price.
Now get rid of Case, Mount, and Shaw.
I would rather have let him go for 20m or less. Because I can’t imagine Aston Villa paying us 40m. So we actually pay him to play for other club. I hope I’m wrong. The only upside is that this is one less problem to deal with for couple of months so we can concentrate on football and not talk about it every week.Benefits no one. This is good business and allows us to improve the side, which I hope we do this window.
Think teams can replace up to three players on their existing list of registered players in Europe.I assume he isn't CL tied for Villa?
Rashford definitely has an issue with application but there's a part of me that thinks his body isn't up to it anymore.
Yes he's only 27 but he started so young he's almost played the same number of matches most players play in their entire careers. Somewhat reminiscent of Rooney who peaked in his early 20s and was looking pretty washed by 28.
He was bad a long time before Amorim joined the club, you can't use that as an excuse for Rashford.Or maybe it means he’s not getting along with his current manager and feels like he’s being forced out.
There are times when it’s right for a player to move on for the good of his career and the good of the club he plays for.
Pretty sure it’s not all as black and white of the club/ manager are saying.
That would be insanely bad business for us when selling a 27 year old with 140 career goals to his name. For context - Newcastle signed Vlachodimos, a 30 year old backup GK from Forest for 20m. I know he's on lower wages than Rashford but we've got to stay firm and demand a transfer fee that somewhat reflects his ability/age. Chelsea did something similar with Lukaku - sent him on loan and held out for a decent transfer fee.I would rather have let him go for 20m or less. Because I can’t imagine Aston Villa paying us 40m. So we actually pay him to play for other club. I hope I’m wrong. The only upside is that this is one less problem to deal with for couple of months so we can concentrate on football and not talk about it every week.
I wouldn't pay much attention to that deal (coupled with Anderson going the other way) given the PSR issue they had at the time.That would be insanely bad business for us when selling a 27 year old with 140 career goals to his name. For context - Newcastle signed Vlachodimos, a 30 year old backup GK from Forest for 20m. I know he's on lower wages than Rashford but we've got to stay firm and demand a transfer fee that somewhat reflects his ability/age. Chelsea did something similar with Lukaku - sent him on loan and held out for a decent transfer fee.
Yeah, they’re just disregarding his wages and overrating him as a player.Exactly some people need a reality check
Ability without application is absolutely worthless.That would be insanely bad business for us when selling a 27 year old with 140 career goals to his name. For context - Newcastle signed Vlachodimos, a 30 year old backup GK from Forest for 20m. I know he's on lower wages than Rashford but we've got to stay firm and demand a transfer fee that somewhat reflects his ability/age. Chelsea did something similar with Lukaku - sent him on loan and held out for a decent transfer fee.