Pughnichi
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2016
- Messages
- 2,471
Expecting the MR PR machine to be in full swing for a few solid months as well
Yeah, on further thinking, have to agree that the amount, if we are to get it, will be good. Decent.He's a speed merchant whose slowly losing his pace, he's on a massive salary, he doesn't fit the system and he had lost his love towards United. 40M is a decent deal.
Lets first see what options he might have in summer than. He needs to play well and run but for 6 months he might be willing to do soThe transfer fee is irrelevant. I really don't see Rashford agreeing to join them long term.
His goal contribution was very good for one of the last three full seasons - even setting aside his high wages and key player status, therfore high expectations, an attacker playing 32 and 43 games for United should be getting much more than 5 and 8 in those other two seasons. So I don't think those will be hard to replicate at all. Zirkzee and Hojlund are pretty much replicating them this season - Hojlund actually better - in what is rightly considered a pretty awful season for them so far.When rashford played well we played well. His goal contributions have still been good over the last few years and will be hard to replicate. However he is the answer and the problem. Not much space at united to a player that literally yoyos in form. And recently it's been at the bottom for a little too long.
The transfer fee is irrelevant. I really don't see Rashford agreeing to join them long term.
I’d have thought so. It’s also up to Rashford, to see what’s out there. There’s a lot of parties at play still. We just have to hope that Rashford absolutely digs out blind for the next six months at villa which in turn make him a bit of hot property around Europe again. And of course, for INEOS to have the wisdom, to know that it’s over for him at United, regardless of how many trees he pulls up during this loan period.Correct me if I'm wrong, but is a buy option mandatory? Villa may have first option on him, but say he does smash it and the likes of Barcelona do decide to spend £50m on him - isn't that still possible? He could even reject Villa if his desired clubs re-entered the chat. All very unlikely though.
Are any villa fans likely to buy anybody’s shirt in February? Especially one that’s possibly only there for 4 months?So basically villa pays around 200k for a 6 month boost on their CL campaign. Massive shirt sales boost as he's Rashford after all.
No obligation to buy. They could have just said thank you we dont want him comes next season and we'll be back to square one
But at least we've saved 200k and he can get play time, better than rotting in reserves
Not out in the wood just yet. Even if he bangs a few goals 300k permanent deal is too much, unless he magically pulls a Messi, which i doubt.
We've been mugged. But hey beggars can't choose
Why does what someone wears in their free time bother you so much? Such a boomer complaint. Oh no he has a loud hoodie on.The douchebag dress sense is the real giveaway for me and shows where his head is at. Rashford clearly thinks he's some kind of Hollywood celebrity. Football is clearly secondary to him at this point in his career.
Even a former world class player like Ronaldo never dressed like that much of a muppet when he was in his prime.
Good job in getting rid of him. Hope he works out great for Villa and we don't see him in a United shirt again.
It's the first dent in Amorims reputation that he's unable to get Rashford firing again and destroyed him publicly?
Give over, he's been poor for 3 years, we need to stop over valuing our players.70% is ok, 40m is almost an insult. 60m minimum in the current market.
United are never going to get £60m for him given the wages he’s on, never mind the form he’s in.70% is ok, 40m is almost an insult. 60m minimum in the current market.
I don't think so. Rashfords head had already gone long before RM arrived.It's the first dent in Amorims reputation that he's unable to get Rashford firing again and destroyed him publicly?
Great deal for us.
Normally with a loan of a senior player between top flight clubs you'd expect a sizeable loan fee - I can't see any talk of that. And we're also covering some of the wages, so we're in effect helping to pay Rashford to play for Villa, rather than them paying us. That's not an absolute steal from us - that's good negotiating once again from Villa. If he fails, he hasn't cost them much. If he succeeds, they've got themselves a good deal.70% and 40M is an absolute steal….for us
He’s been a nothing player for us for quite some time so that sounds like a great deal to me.
He could win the ballon dor at Aston Villa and I wouldn’t care less. Let’s hope he performs to a suitable standard to ensure we pocket that money
It's because he's not backing it up with performances on the pitch. That's why it bothers me. Shows that he's more concerned about image and ego rather than playing football at this point.Why does what someone wears in their free time bother you so much? Such a boomer complaint. Oh no he has a loud hoodie on.
Brazilian Ronaldo was a pioneer of don't give a shit stupid footballer hair cuts.
I'd say the way he has handled the whole situation is more like his first trophy.It's the first dent in Amorims reputation that he's unable to get Rashford firing again and destroyed him publicly?
It’s the total opposite. Finally someone has the nuts to call the right shots for the good of the team. The tail was wagging the dog for a little while there. This is a prime Fergie move.It's the first dent in Amorims reputation that he's unable to get Rashford firing again and destroyed him publicly?
This guy is “staff” .Why does what someone wears in their free time bother you so much? Such a boomer complaint. Oh no he has a loud hoodie on.
Brazilian Ronaldo was a pioneer of don't give a shit stupid footballer hair cuts.
Rashford's Reputation Status:
If that was the case, pretty sure Rashford would just turn down Villa's offer.Why the feck are we including a buy option clause? That’s absolute madness. It’s of no benefit at all to us and, if Rashford tears it up, we will have the best clubs in Europe lining up to sign him.
No offence but this is the sort of thinking that saw us retain Lingard after his West Ham loan, or give the likes of Jones and Bailly new 5 year deals, to ‘protect their value’.Why the feck are we including a buy option clause? That’s absolute madness. It’s of no benefit at all to us and, if Rashford tears it up, we will have the best clubs in Europe lining up to sign him.
Don't do drugs kids.70% is ok, 40m is almost an insult. 60m minimum in the current market.
What's your point?This guy is “staff” .
No offence but this is the sort of thinking that saw us retain Lingard after his West Ham loan, or give the likes of Jones and Bailly new 5 year deals, to ‘protect their value’.
If we’re sure he isn’t good enough, back your judgement, and have the confidence to cut and run. That’s the sort of decisive mindset we’ve been lacking.
Absolute drivel but expected given the state of some of our fans these days, the boss has played this perfectly as the only guilty party here is Rashford and his unprofessional attitude.It's the first dent in Amorims reputation that he's unable to get Rashford firing again and destroyed him publicly?
Is this a question or statement? It's daft either way.It's the first dent in Amorims reputation that he's unable to get Rashford firing again and destroyed him publicly?