If he was ten years older he'd have had a career at Everton or West Ham. He's been one of the main beneficiaries of the last decade.Of course he does. I'm just saying its really sad what he's become. Despised by the fanbase. Had he been ten years older he'd have been an all time great. I just feel the environment he's come up in has done him no favours. If you disagree, fair enough.
At any rate, it's time for him to move on. Just saddened by what could've been.
You think an Italian team is paying that much for him?Juventus or some italian team probably. $45 mil and be done with it.
Well, Keane did so let's not use that as a stick to beat the lad with. I think the problem is what Rene Hake said recently about players being unwilling to change their game. I strongly suspect Rashford is one of them. He wants to be a wide forward who always shoots and doesn't press, like Ronaldo at Real, and we just don't need that from him, therefore he's sellable.I don't care where he goes (even Arsenal) because I think he just fell out of love with football. He definitely loves the riches that it brings him though. For a "local lad who loves the club" he sure bent us over when it came time to renew his contract. I know the club is run by idiots, but if we didn’t meet his price he would’ve left for the highest bidder. I can’t imagine Scholes or Neville doing the same thing.
What did him and Garnacho do apart from the not putting in 100 percent. Has it come our yet
It doesn’t feel good how this is happening but it feels like it has to be done.I'm being soft but I do feel bad for him there. That tweet and article is savage. Imagine reading that you're basically being sold because you're the poster boy for all that is wrong in your organisation.
Because you cant see past your agenda?My Arsenal supporting mate said yesterday that he'd happily take Rashford for £40m. Though he said that he would play him as a number 9. Would snap their hand off for that.
Agenda? We aren't getting more than £40m for Rashford. I couldn't care less where he went.Because you cant see past your agenda?
Why even take the slightest risk that we might end up strengthening a team we hope to be a direct rival in the near future? I'd much rather he went to another league....
Because you cant see past your agenda?
Why even take the slightest risk that we might end up strengthening a team we hope to be a direct rival in the near future? I'd much rather he went to another league....
So are you prepared to get paid a pittance for Rashford and have the money available to strengthen United just to have no risk of strengthening a league rival, or do you actually think the club would get anything in the region of 40 million out of any continental club for Rashford?Because you cant see past your agenda?
Why even take the slightest risk that we might end up strengthening a team we hope to be a direct rival in the near future? I'd much rather he went to another league....
Keane wasn't home grown.Well, Keane did so let's not use that as a stick to beat the lad with. I think the problem is what Rene Hake said recently about players being unwilling to change their game. I strongly suspect Rashford is one of them. He wants to be a wide forward who always shoots and doesn't press, like Ronaldo at Real, and we just don't need that from him, therefore he's sellable.
40 mil from Arse or 30 mil elsewhere? Elsewhere everyday......So are you prepared to get paid a pittance for Rashford and have the money available to strengthen United just to have no risk of strengthening a league rival, or do you actually think the club would get anything in the region of 40 million out of any continental club for Rashford?
We play spurs Thursday night and it’s fairly evident Rashford will not be starting.If Amorim brings Rashford back into the team straight away ,he has severely weakened his position at United.
Hopefully he has the backbone to follow up now by moving Rashford out of the club as soon as possible, he has been stinking the place up for years.
Taking that trip to New York during the international break just goes to show that it’s all about him, doesn’t give a fig what anyone thinks , two fingers to the new manager.
You're not getting 30 million either from a continental club for a washed-up onedimensional player with attitude problems and stellar wage demands which he has not justified in the last two and a half years.40 mil from Arse or 30 mil elsewhere? Elsewhere everyday......
PSG have seemingly always been interested in Rashford and with no Mbappe there and their forward line needing to be strengthened it’s very believable Rashford would go there as it works for both parties, for PSG they’d sign a big name who can play at pace across the frontline and for Rashford it’s guaranteed CL football with similar wages and an easier league so can play at 50%.You're not getting 30 million either from a continental club for a washed-up onedimensional player with attitude problems and stellar wage demands which he has not justified in the last two and a half years.
In which case why would we even be getting 40 mill from Arsenal? Make it make sense...You're not getting 30 million either from a continental club for a washed-up onedimensional player with attitude problems and stellar wage demands which he has not justified in the last two and a half years.
The timing is actually not too bad. As you say, Mbappe is out, and Kolo Muani seems to be struggling there, so their attack probably needs an injection of sorts. Rashford will most likely be a solid name for them, and I would assume he would put up good numbers there without having to work hard as PSG are so dominant most of the time anyhow.PSG have seemingly always been interested in Rashford and with no Mbappe there and their forward line needing to be strengthened it’s very believable Rashford would go there as it works for both parties, for PSG they’d sign a big name who can play at pace across the frontline and for Rashford it’s guaranteed CL football with similar wages and an easier league so can play at 50%.
I'm sure Sir Jim is looking at Rashy and seeing that 465k a week (is that what we are up too?) plus his pure profit being from the academy and thinking it's too good of a saving not to grab it.
Rashford has had one good season in four. Even without the huge contract, it would have been difficult to get top dollar for him. We aren't going to get big money, even from a domestic rival.
The last few pages suggest some people care how much we get and where he goes to. I think selling to your rivals shouldn't be a taboo.I doubt 90% of fans give two fecks about the fee. He could go for 20 million and I wouldn't actually mind that much, just once we get those wages off the books.
If Amorim brings Rashford back into the team straight away ,he has severely weakened his position at United.
Hopefully he has the backbone to follow up now by moving Rashford out of the club as soon as possible, he has been stinking the place up for years.
Taking that trip to New York during the international break just goes to show that it’s all about him, doesn’t give a fig what anyone thinks , two fingers to the new manager.
I'm sure Sir Jim is looking at Rashy and seeing that 465k a week (is that what we are up too?) plus his pure profit being from the academy and thinking it's too good of a saving not to grab it.
I actually think that wouldn't be a bad idea. Aside from the historic rivalry, Arsenal and United are not even "direct rivals" at this point, which is something the club itself has acknowledged saying that we're years away from a title challenge, and, in the unlikely event that Rashford fired Arsenal to the league title, at least Liverpool and City don't win. I'd wish him all the best on that front if it stops Liverpool.My Arsenal supporting mate said yesterday that he'd happily take Rashford for £40m. Though he said that he would play him as a number 9. Would snap their hand off for that.
Well, Keane did so let's not use that as a stick to beat the lad with. I think the problem is what Rene Hake said recently about players being unwilling to change their game. I strongly suspect Rashford is one of them. He wants to be a wide forward who always shoots and doesn't press, like Ronaldo at Real, and we just don't need that from him, therefore he's sellable.
Why does it? He dropped him and if he's trained well since then and no further issues, bringing him back weakens him in no way.
Why does it ? Because training well for a week means nothing when you have been acting the maggot for years.Why does it? He dropped him and if he's trained well since then and no further issues, bringing him back weakens him in no way.
Agreed on the risk involved on the part of the buying club. I explained this to my mate. I think as someone who doesn't watch United as often as us, he was of the view that Rashford's poor form is more of a 'toxic United' problem than a Rashford issue. He might be right in the sense that a move could reignite Rashford. However, with a hypothetical £40m fee and big wages on the line, there is no guarantee that Rashford would recapture the form of previous years. There is a chance that he has genuinely already had his best years.I actually think that wouldn't be a bad idea. Aside from the historic rivalry, Arsenal and United are not even "direct rivals" at this point, which is something the club itself has acknowledged saying that we're years away from a title challenge, and, in the unlikely event that Rashford fired Arsenal to the league title, at least Liverpool and City don't win. I'd wish him all the best on that front if it stops Liverpool.
But Arsenal would buy at their own risk- it's not a controversial statement or someone being a "hater" to say Rashford has had extremely hit and miss form for over 4 years now. To go from a season of 5 goals to 30 to 8 to 7 this season (but still having massive issues) is evidence of this, not to mention his lifestyle and disciplinary issues.
