DJ_21
Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
He was great last game. His passing was really good. Looked sharp.He looks fit but the performances I have seen so far Casemiro has looked poor
He was great last game. His passing was really good. Looked sharp.He looks fit but the performances I have seen so far Casemiro has looked poor
My hot take is Mazraoui is better. It will be a good contest nonetheless.Dalot starts
He wont be fit for half of the games.My hot take is Mazraoui is better. It will be a good contest nonetheless.
My hot take is Mazraoui is better. It will be a good contest nonetheless.
He's looked good in my opinion. It's because he's not been asked to play a single pivot and exposed by suicidal tactics.He looks fit but the performances I have seen so far Casemiro has looked poor
Yeah people underestimate the effect the ability to snap at players and win the ball in midfield would have on our attack. His role isn't for the build up, I suspect he would play higher than Mainoo in the first phase, he will be the presser and Mainoo will be developed as the first phase build up player and sweeper in behind - he doesn't have the physique for a box to box 8. If Ugarte wins the ball and lays it off to Bruno, 9/10 times that's a goalscoring chance.I think he is being underrated on here and I also think people are underrating the effect a proper, strong and physical ball winner with endless stamina can have on the team and our performances. Yes, he is a safe passer but his primary role isn't to be the playmaker in our midfield. He will win the ball back and give it to our midfielders that are tasked with progressing the ball. One of our main problems was that any team in the league - even the bottom teams - could dominate our midfield quite easily because we had no player in midfield that had an interest in winning the ball back, and if they did, they didn't have the legs for it and opposition midfielders and attackers could pretty much run past them with no problems. That's not going to happen with Ugarte and he will force errors and mispasses even if he doesn't win the ball back with a tackle or interception.
I've seen some talk about his passing being terrible here. It really isn't, it's just that he isn't a very progressive passer. Look at Palhinha, he makes a lot fewer passes than Ugarte, worse pass completion and even worse progressive passing, yet no one seems to have any problems calling him one of the best defensive midfielders in the league, and Bayern had no issues paying £47m for him.
People also seem to forget that Kanté wasn't a particularly progressive passer, either, but he was a pretty good ball carrier.
In my opinion, this is a crucial signing for our midfield and absolutely essential if we want to improve as a team and not be dominated by most midfields.
Where did you read we bid 50m EUR?We have offered 50m euro which has not been accepted yet , they want 60m euro.
So I don't know why people talk in the region of 40m euros.
Secondly we could have spent 27m on Amrabat for a straight sale last summer...
I think 10m for a season was worth it , as now we can see 27m would have been too much for him.
I think we would have seen more progress on this if it was going to happen. Personally, I think Casemiro could be great again this season anyway. Players can have 1 bad season and bounce back. Not sure why everyone's so certain he can never improve, given he was one of the best midfielders in the league the previous season.
Neves is the one we should have been signing imo but he's gone to PSG now. Better off getting a cheap backup for the position than spending the crazy amounts being demanded for Ugarte
My hot take is Mazraoui is better. It will be a good contest nonetheless.
He wont be fit for half of the games.
That's for the Mazraoui thread please.I still think this happens.
is this a hot take? I think most think Mazzaoui is better, but the likelihood of him being barely available is the big negative.
Assuming United want a destroyer in DM, who is an alternative to Ugarte? The Sociedad midfielder seems a different type of player
I think he is being underrated on here and I also think people are underrating the effect a proper, strong and physical ball winner with endless stamina can have on the team and our performances. Yes, he is a safe passer but his primary role isn't to be the playmaker in our midfield. He will win the ball back and give it to our midfielders that are tasked with progressing the ball. One of our main problems was that any team in the league - even the bottom teams - could dominate our midfield quite easily because we had no player in midfield that had an interest in winning the ball back, and if they did, they didn't have the legs for it and opposition midfielders and attackers could pretty much run past them with no problems. That's not going to happen with Ugarte and he will force errors and mispasses even if he doesn't win the ball back with a tackle or interception.
I've seen some talk about his passing being terrible here. It really isn't, it's just that he isn't a very progressive passer. Look at Palhinha, he makes a lot fewer passes than Ugarte, worse pass completion and even worse progressive passing, yet no one seems to have any problems calling him one of the best defensive midfielders in the league, and Bayern had no issues paying £47m for him
I agree, most crucial signing of the summer for me. Only paulinha has higher stats last season than Ugarte. He will make a massive difference to our midfield.People also seem to forget that Kanté wasn't a particularly progressive passer, either, but he was a pretty good ball carrier.
In my opinion, this is a crucial signing for our midfield and absolutely essential if we want to improve as a team and not be dominated by most midfields.
Assuming United want a destroyer in DM, who is an alternative to Ugarte? The Sociedad midfielder seems a different type of player
I still think that Ugarte and Mainoo as a pairing would have sub-optimal passing range. Kobbie has very promising ability to progress the ball in different ways but ideally you would want the starting midfield to have at least one player with a more expansive range to open the play up.
Problem with that is Mainoo sounds like the problem by that statement.
You’re basically wanting a top DM with exceptional passing as well. Not many of them about, let alone available
It is not about him being a problem, it is constructing a midfield that is balanced. Mainoo will very likely develop his passing range but it may take time, giving him a partner who is very good at winning the ball but rather limited with it doesn't seem sensible.
May be entirely wrong, hope that I am if he is signed but transfer optimism often overrides logic among fans.
The double pivot will vary according to the opposition. Ugarte and Casemiro is a pairing you could see him use often.I still think that Ugarte and Mainoo as a pairing would have sub-optimal passing range. Kobbie has very promising ability to progress the ball in different ways but ideally you would want the starting midfield to have at least one player with a more expansive range to open the play up.
That’s fine, but you mention logic, so whose your suggestion to partner him?
It is not about him being a problem, it is constructing a midfield that is balanced. Mainoo will very likely develop his passing range but it may take time, giving him a partner who is very good at winning the ball but rather limited with it doesn't seem sensible.
May be entirely wrong, hope that I am if he is signed but transfer optimism often overrides logic among fans.
Reckon it’s going to be a loan with option to buy rather than a straight up transfer deal.I think this deal makes perfect sense if we can get him for around 35-40m
He solves a problem for us, and that’s protecting the back 4
We’ve got Mainoo who needs to grow as a player and the same with Collyer.
Our midfield is going to rotate depending on the opposition and you’re just not gonna get much for less that 40m these days
Italian teams used to I think but yeah it doesn’t seem common. More likely it’d be an option but with a high loan cost so PSG cover themselves if Utd refuse the optionHow many loan + obligation to buy deals do you actually see? I feel like they're floated but so rarely actually happen, like swap deals. But I could be wrong.
Look i dont disagree with you, but where is that expansive passer in the market though? With the exception of Joao Neves who I would have loved to have signed (but would have made fir a very inexperienced midfield with Mainoo), I don't really see that profile of player available in the market. There's also the risk that the player profile you're talking about with Mainoo is too lightweight and gets overrun if he's not also a great ball winner, which means you're basically looking for a Rodri. I'm find with us focusing on brawn and security first, especially given the passing ability of both Mainoo and Ugarte could be improved given their age profile.I still think that Ugarte and Mainoo as a pairing would have sub-optimal passing range. Kobbie has very promising ability to progress the ball in different ways but ideally you would want the starting midfield to have at least one player with a more expansive range to open the play up.
It is not about him being a problem, it is constructing a midfield that is balanced. Mainoo will very likely develop his passing range but it may take time, giving him a partner who is very good at winning the ball but rather limited with it doesn't seem sensible.
May be entirely wrong, hope that I am if he is signed but transfer optimism often overrides logic among fans.
I think he is being underrated on here and I also think people are underrating the effect a proper, strong and physical ball winner with endless stamina can have on the team and our performances. Yes, he is a safe passer but his primary role isn't to be the playmaker in our midfield. He will win the ball back and give it to our midfielders that are tasked with progressing the ball. One of our main problems was that any team in the league - even the bottom teams - could dominate our midfield quite easily because we had no player in midfield that had an interest in winning the ball back, and if they did, they didn't have the legs for it and opposition midfielders and attackers could pretty much run past them with no problems. That's not going to happen with Ugarte and he will force errors and mispasses even if he doesn't win the ball back with a tackle or interception.
I've seen some talk about his passing being terrible here. It really isn't, it's just that he isn't a very progressive passer. Look at Palhinha, he makes a lot fewer passes than Ugarte, worse pass completion and even worse progressive passing, yet no one seems to have any problems calling him one of the best defensive midfielders in the league, and Bayern had no issues paying £47m for him.
People also seem to forget that Kanté wasn't a particularly progressive passer, either, but he was a pretty good ball carrier.
In my opinion, this is a crucial signing for our midfield and absolutely essential if we want to improve as a team and not be dominated by most midfields.
The problem is we font need to replace him but other playersI think this will finish fairly quickly once/if Mctominay leaves.
How many loan + obligation to buy deals do you actually see? I feel like they're floated but so rarely actually happen, like swap deals. But I could be wrong.
Don’t think either of them are like the transfer business under the Woodwood era.Not about being positive or negative. I was happy with Zirkzee and Yoro transfers and they're great business. I'd be happy with getting any promising potential or an established player from a lower status club. With Ugarte and De Ligt, it's a familiar feeling of the transfer business we've been doing in the Woodwardian era. I can't think of many players who've had this sort of a transfer and who've succeeded in the recent era in the premier league. Odegaard maybe.