Manuel Ugarte | Romano - he’s signed | Awaiting Club announcement

Status
Not open for further replies.
If there’s not much difference, then that means you’ve seen it though, so I assume can still post Ugarte at sporting vs neves and benfica
Side by side comparisons of Neves 23/24 v Ugarte 22/23

Those defensive percentiles!

NdBs2sx.png


lByqFfp.png


s4YKnjF.png


gk3KV4F.png


s1QzhkM.png


qlyc3r1.png


q9AyxLb.png
 
Whartons 58.6 attempted forward passes with 22.1% being successful means 12.9 successful forward passes per game and 45.7 losses of possession.

Ugartes 27.9 attempted forward passes with 45% being successful means 12.5 successful forward passes per game and. 15.4 losses of possession.

Yet everyone seems to think Whartons progressive passing is a big advantage he holds over Ugarte?
Mate this is percentiles. Not raw stats
 
Both Yoro (~62+8M EUR) and Ugarte (60M EUR) are moderate overpays for me. I really like both and would be really glad to have both in the squad but we can't claim a successful negotiation or anything close to that.

Ultimately if they get it right, no one will remember the fee. If they end up being the wrong signings for any number of reasons - off field drama (Antony / Greenwood), discipline (Sancho), injuries (Mount), performance (Antony, Sancho) the fees we paid will be a source of much criticism towards the club.

It seems like Onana / Felix vs Ugarte will be a talking point through out the season.
Personally don’t think Yoro and sugary deals are remotely comparable. Yoro is largely considered the best CB prospect in the sport. He’s the type of player that if he does what we think he will he’ll be on the team sheet for a decade.

Ugarte is most likely a cog in the squad for what he does and doesn’t bring.
 
Personally don’t think Yoro and sugary deals are remotely comparable. Yoro is largely considered the best CB prospect in the sport. He’s the type of player that if he does what we think he will he’ll be on the team sheet for a decade.

Ugarte is most likely a cog in the squad for what he does and doesn’t bring.
You don't think he's a starter?
 
One of the journalists said that guardiola rates PSGs Vitiniha as the most unique midfielder in world football. Able to play 10 / 8 / 6 at an elite level. If they could buy anyone to swap game time with Rodri (and give him some rest), Vitiniha would be their choice. That's some praise seeing how special rodri is.

It's interesting that PSG have suddenly decided to reward Vitiniha with a new contract...

Yeah I love Vitinha. PSG have the makings of the BITW midfield for the near future if WZE keeps ascending. Those 2 with Neves is unreal as a combo.
 
Look I’m not saying Neves doesn’t have the potential to be a top midfielder but at the current point in time we need someone shielding the ball four and a better tackler/ball winner rather than a deeper lying midfielder i.e Rodri in that #6 position. We are open right now in the middle during games and Neves wouldn’t solve that problem. Ugarte is better suited to that role CURRENTLY than Neves is.
Neves's ball winning numbers are just as good as Ugarte's, AND he is better on the ball.
 
That's a poor deal if true, looks like they've worn us down in negotiations. He's a €45m player.
 
You don't think he's a starter?
I think he’s a starter for now yes. I don’t think he’s someone you pencil in at the base of our midfield for the next 5 years (as he currently is. Of course if our staff works wonders with him especially in possession then he could be).

Probably ends up being used how Fred was for us I think.
 
EPJmCWm.jpeg


There's not much difference, and you cant see 22/23 graph stats on fbref.

Maybe this is why Highfather didn't want to show Neves compared to Ugarte at Sporting?

More goals from a less xG
Better pass completion.
One less progressive pass per game
More tackles per game
More interceptions
More blocks
Didn't clear it as much
 
7ef6ebd77e94b91091cfee6c8fa58909.png


Buy Gueye, sell Mainoo.

AKA, be sceptical of radar charts generally, radar charts that skew towards specific profiles of midfielders specifically, and contextless stats always.
 
One of the journalists said that guardiola rates PSGs Vitiniha as the most unique midfielder in world football. Able to play 10 / 8 / 6 at an elite level. If they could buy anyone to swap game time with Rodri (and give him some rest), Vitiniha would be their choice. That's some praise seeing how special rodri is.

It's interesting that PSG have suddenly decided to reward Vitiniha with a new contract...
I wanted us to sign him when he was gettable. PSG played a blinder signing him and Fabian Ruiz around the same time.
 
Look I’m not saying Neves doesn’t have the potential to be a top midfielder but at the current point in time we need someone shielding the ball four and a better tackler/ball winner rather than a deeper lying midfielder i.e Rodri in that #6 position. We are open right now in the middle during games and Neves wouldn’t solve that problem. Ugarte is better suited to that role CURRENTLY than Neves is.

I’m miffed they got Neves at that price because I think he’s the ideal partner with Mainoo in front of a true anchor for the next decade. Basically could rotate him with bot Bruno and KM right now and then he replaces Bruno as a more traditional 8 in future years.

But yeah probably not a priority for this years current team considering Casemiro is the only DM we have.
 
Neves's ball winning numbers are just as good as Ugarte's, AND he is better on the ball.
We are getting Ugarte. We are not getting Neves. Deal with it. Shitting all over this deal and crying about Neves won’t help you coping with this news.
 
not even close. we couldn't clear the obvious deadwood for starters. we're marching into new season with 2 (two) fit fullbacks and two other who played combined 12 games last season, both left backs..
Yes left-back isn't good but who should we sign?

The only "deadwood player" is McTominay and maybe he still leaves.
Lindelöf is injured.
Eriksen could be on his way to Ajax.
Pellistri goes to Panathinaikos.
Hannibal goes to Burnley.
Who else?
 
I’m actually excited to have a proper ball winner in the side.

Talking being one dimensional doesn’t really concern me much. If he’s one of the best at what he does, it’s going to improve us a lot.

If our full backs offer enough going forward, then having somebody like Ugarte to win the ball and leave the build up to other players, will give us plenty of options.

People wanting Neves just sounds more like flavour of the month. He’s not what we need and wouldn’t work with what we already have.

Benfica are also the masters of selling absolute hype jobs as well, so people want Neves for his reputation alone.
At long last, a specialist ball winner. Tired of teams coming here and thinking they can just pop it about at will. We now have a pit bull in the middle of the park who ain't having it !!

Martinez will be sharpening his butcher's knives as I write this!:devil:
 
Ugarte was bought by PSG before they hired Enrique. That has been his main issue at the club.

Also just like Casemiro he is a lot better on the ball than he is getting credit for or stats especially at PSG suggest
 
Ugarte/left back(loan if needs be) this window.Wharton,nypan,left back(if still needed) and young left winger next summer. Please.
 
Yes left-back isn't good but who should we sign?

The only "deadwood player" is McTominay and maybe he still leaves.
Lindelöf is injured.
Eriksen could be on his way to Ajax.
Pellistri goes to Panathinaikos.
Hannibal goes to Burnley.
Who else?
Jadon Sancho and Antony
 
You know how little the Caf have seen of a player when every page is just a stat war
 
We are getting Ugarte. We are not getting Neves. Deal with it. Shitting all over this deal and crying about Neves won’t help you coping with this news.
As Neves's agent is Jorge Mendes maybe he told United that his client was going to PSG anyway. He will have come out of it very well. He didn't get to be a super agent without knowing which deals are best for him.
 
not even close. we couldn't clear the obvious deadwood for starters. we're marching into new season with 2 (two) fit fullbacks and two other who played combined 12 games last season, both left backs..
We have Harry Amass at left back which is probably why we won’t sign one this summer.

We have done some really good business. After Ugarte if we can bring in one more it should be an attacker not a defender
 
Ugarte was bought by PSG before they hired Enrique. That has been his main issue at the club.

Also just like Casemiro he is a lot better on the ball than he is getting credit for or stats especially at PSG suggest

Thank you for some positivity
 
I see some posters chiming in with price appraisals very matter of factly. Have the appraisers watched, I dunno, maybe 5-10 full matches?
 
That's a poor deal if true, looks like they've worn us down in negotiations. He's a €45m player.
It looks a poor deal to you only because you know we were in negotiations with psg for so long and were expecting to bring down the price considerably. In isolation, £50m is a very good price for him in a market where players like Smith Rowe going for 35m, Gallagher for £40m etc.
 
Feels like some in here are almost waiting for him to have a bad game so they can bring out his stats, worth remembering Amrabat had some amazing stats but didn't see it much on the pitch.
 
Side by side comparisons of Neves 23/24 v Ugarte 22/23

Those defensive percentiles!

NdBs2sx.png


lByqFfp.png


s4YKnjF.png


gk3KV4F.png


s1QzhkM.png


qlyc3r1.png


q9AyxLb.png
Neves is too short to partner Mainoo especially when we are trying to sell McTominay and have Martinez at CB
 
I noticed this Quarez who has tweeted saying they are close to agreement is rated in good tier for PSG
 
I’m not saying it hasn’t. And I was never implying that our back room hasn’t done all of the due diligence required. I was merely stating my own reservations as someone who’s watched/researched him a fair amount since he first popped up on our radar and how he fits into our own team.

And in general I sort of hate the attitude of “the club knows better than us they’ve done all the work etc.” because we’ve seen clubs time and again feck up transfers and especially in the modern day I think 3rd party individuals and even your average fan has far more ability to watch and analyze football and form decently educated opinions considering the absurd amount of information available to them. Compared to even 10-15 years ago, you have pages of advanced data and stats, full 90’s of every match in any semi decent league available, individual cut ups of a players every action in any given game from even their earliest years, and more. It’s perfectly reasonable to be skeptical of a certain move a club makes if you’ve also done the work to form an educated opinion yourself. I just have an issue with those that will watch someone once in a random UCL game on TV and say their shite and defend that opinion with their life
I don't disagree that Utd especially under Woodward have epically dropped the ball on signings. As was widely reported we had hundreds of scouts under Woodward, reports were coming in on mass and no one was reading them. We missed out on players we should have signed. Even scouts who worked for us at the time, have said they submitted recommendations for the club to prioritise looking at signing player x,y,z and it was ignored because the reports weren't read.

On more than one occasion we sent multiple scouts to scout the same player at the same game and the scouts weren't aware of each other at the game and that they were scouting the same player. Just a farce.

I think both Ole and Mourinho had their own personal scout who reported directly to them as they didnt trust the club scouts under Marcel bout (I think, it was him).

The scouting department has been slimline and has been revamped since Woodward left and was further tweaked to the point, it's believed to be a very good state now. Which is one of the reasons why I'm more personally confident in the clubs recruitment. I dont think Yoro, Zirkzee etc would have happened under woodward and the glazers. We also seem to be doing our homework on players (ETH requests aside). So hopefully we won't get weak feeble personalities like Sancho at the club again.

Agree there is alot of tools for armchair fans to do their own analysis. However it's obviously nowhere near as advanced as the proper licenced tooling the clubs pay for that gives them rich, deep datasets, tooling to adjust the required information parameters. But the tooling is only as good as the analysis of the information it produces.

Warren Buffet famously had a 1 million dollar wager that a robo-manager could produce better results with passive investments than a star hedge fund investment manager with active investments over a period of 10 years. He won the bet.

It would never happen, but it would be so interesting to see the results of a 10 year bet on a clubs scouting team, player selections and subsequent purchases, versus a fans analytics driven selections and purchases. Who would come out on top?
 
I wanted us to sign him when he was gettable. PSG played a blinder signing him and Fabian Ruiz around the same time.
I was totally shocked to hear he was at Wolves in the PL for a season but rarely got any gametime. Wolves REALLY dropped the ball on that one.
 
Do people think it will end up being a permanent deal now or loan with obligation to buy?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.