Sweden has no go zones and this year a guy hijacked a truck and butchered five people
http://www.snopes.com/sweden-crime-no-go-zone-police/
Sweden has no go zones and this year a guy hijacked a truck and butchered five people
An 8 year old girl now confirmed dead. What an absolute disgrace.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...dead-manchester-attack-ariana-grande-concert/
Half of this is untrueSweden has no go zones and this year a guy hijacked a truck and butchered five people, Berlin had a similar attack, the Bastille Day attack at Nice was disgusting with more the 80 murders. London has mainly muslim neighborhoods with sharia police, Paris had extremists rioting and using Molotov on policemen, terror attacks skyrocketed throughout Europe and there is one common factor in the massive majority, if not all of them. Islam extremists.
I'm from Brazil, and we are a very diverse place, with a small muslim community.
You rarely see terror attacks here (few weeks back, there was a Syrian who threw a bomb in a protest, but was quickly arrested, and some years back a guy converted to Islam, went to a school and shot a bunch of children, in the Massacre of Realengo). You don't see marches in favor of Sharia, to defend hijab, or being harassed in the streets for not dressing by some standards written in the book (although, there are some people that try to shame others, but it's ridiculed). You see mostly muslims fitting the culture, not trying to change it, or dominate it. I had very few openly muslim friends, and those guys were crazier than me, in a good sense. The little contact I had showed me no difference between us.
I don't know if extremists don't get a turn here because we are a very open and violent country, or because their intolerance wouldn't fly here.
I agree that giving too much exposure to terrorist is falling to what they wish, spread fear and show the power to punish the infidels. But seeing what happens in Europe, I often wonder when will be enough?
Sweden has no go zones and this year a guy hijacked a truck and butchered five people, Berlin had a similar attack, the Bastille Day attack at Nice was disgusting with more the 80 murders. London has mainly muslim neighborhoods with sharia police, Paris had extremists rioting and using Molotov on policemen, terror attacks skyrocketed throughout Europe and there is one common factor in the massive majority, if not all of them. Islam extremists.
I know there are lots of muslims here, and most if not all condem this kind of attitude, I assume. With the attacks being more constant, where do you think the relations in Europe will head?
The identity has to be released. Everything has to be transparent in these cases. Imagine if these type of attacks increase to the point where you've maybe a dozen every year, and the authorities refuse to release names or anything - people would go absolutely nuts understandably thinking there's something sinister going on. All the details need to be made known to the public IMO.
In the West, this should be the priority in the long term. I understand people wanting more money spent on security and more snooping etc, but education, integration (which doesn't only apply to foreigners, but British citizens as well), and the culling of extremist/radical preachers in the country should be really targeted. I have no idea how much is being invested in these.
Countries with a large Muslim population have more chances in having bad apples and the fact they are in large numbers takes more time for them to assimilate with the local culture if ever they do, plus the fact they aren't that far from the Muslim countries. Here in the states I see the same pattern with the Hispanic population, they live in large numbers in the cities and they don't assimilate the local culture and in some cases they are born in US and they don't speak English until they go to school. The Puerto Ricans are the exception I know a few and they don't speak Spanish.I'm from Brazil, and we are a very diverse place, with a small muslim community.
You rarely see terror attacks here (few weeks back, there was a Syrian who threw a bomb in a protest, but was quickly arrested, and some years back a guy converted to Islam, went to a school and shot a bunch of children, in the Massacre of Realengo). You don't see marches in favor of Sharia, to defend hijab, or being harassed in the streets for not dressing by some standards written in the book (although, there are some people that try to shame others, but it's ridiculed). You see mostly muslims fitting the culture, not trying to change it, or dominate it. I had very few openly muslim friends, and those guys were crazier than me, in a good sense. The little contact I had showed me no difference between us.
I don't know if extremists don't get a turn here because we are a very open and violent country, or because their intolerance wouldn't fly here.
I agree that giving too much exposure to terrorist is falling to what they wish, spread fear and show the power to punish the infidels. But seeing what happens in Europe, I often wonder when will be enough?
Sweden has no go zones and this year a guy hijacked a truck and butchered five people, Berlin had a similar attack, the Bastille Day attack at Nice was disgusting with more the 80 murders. London has mainly muslim neighborhoods with sharia police, Paris had extremists rioting and using Molotov on policemen, terror attacks skyrocketed throughout Europe and there is one common factor in the massive majority, if not all of them. Islam extremists.
I know there are lots of muslims here, and most if not all condem this kind of attitude, I assume. With the attacks being more constant, where do you think the relations in Europe will head?
Are they? The Tim Poole vídeo at Ringkeby, if I remember right, was quite bizarre. Swesish authorities said that there no "no go zones", but problematic areas. The video speak for it self.The things in bold are wrong.
What is wrong with people?Utterly bizarre narcissism:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-40010376?ocid=socialflow_twitter
The thing is if the attacker is related to a terrorist group, they will release the name through their own methods. This will then get around to their target audience. So I am not really sure that withholding the name from the mainstream media is really going to prevent future attacks. Even a lone wolf inspired by some terror group will probably be found out by these groups and used by them for their own propaganda purposes.
Thanks, I replied the guy before about it. I saw this at snopes, they were not no zone, but problematic areas. Then that were the Tim Poole videos and the police officers attacks
My regret is that this particular piece of scum didn't die a long...slow...lingering...painful death from his own injuries as some of his victims no doubt did.
You realize that there's no Sharia police in Germany?Are they? The Tim Poole vídeo at Ringkeby, if I remember right, was quite bizarre. Swesish authorities said that there no "no go zones", but problematic areas. The video speak for it self.
I remeber seeing a video on CNN about that in London, but found this about Germany: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/21/germany-sharia-police-court-ruling
Here BBC said 2015 had the most attackings in history, but maybe is my perception but the attacks are getting more and more frequent. Maybe it's me
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36845647
My regret is that this particular piece of scum didn't die a long...slow...lingering...painful death from his own injuries as some of his victims no doubt did.
Very good post which I fully subscribe to.In the West, this should be the priority in the long term. I understand people wanting more money spent on security and more snooping etc, but education, integration (which doesn't only apply to foreigners, but British citizens as well), and the culling of extremist/radical preachers in the country should be really targeted. I have no idea how much is being invested in these.
I'm not saying that the problem are the immigrants. I'm saying that the commom factor is the religion extremism. Sometimes, I don't even know if i should be called extremism, because the passages in the quran are quite clear about infidels.Although the trolly hijacker was from Uzbekistan, the insane extremists that are under the radar of the Swedish Security Police are born and raised in Sweden. It is mostly due to an integration problem here, but can't really speak for the situation of other countries. It is sad, because these tragedies gives fuel to the foreign-adversial propaganda for a certain political party. Considering the "No-go-zones" in Sweden - ehm, what?
I agree, but you'll get shouted down for that here. Apparently he deserves a trial, and then to be jailed, clothed and fed for the rest of his life.
The No-go zones are being debated, as that maybe my perception of more and more attacks is being skewed, but what are the others that sum half?Half of this is untrue
The American state used that power to end the peaceful protests of Occupy Wall Street. A state with a lot of knowledge about it's citizens and therefore a lot of power over it's citizens has little incentive to make sure all citizens are all right with what the state does.It's nothing to do with political correctness, its about not handing over power to the state to have access to every aspect of your life. People will say this isn't the time to talk about it, but it's exactly the time. Because now is the time when powers are given away that will never be gotten back. You might not have anything to hide (you think), but maybe you'll think differently when you find out what handing the state these kinds of powers actually means. Look at America if you don't believe me, people prevented from flying for reasons they are never told but because their name ended up on the wrong list, people's every text message or email scanned, no accountability for any of it because of 'national security' and 'keeping people safe'.
I'm not opposed to all surveilance but it hasn't always been effective in preventing terrorist attacks. And it's about the only thing states are prepared to do against terrorism. It's not like the UK, the USA or any European state is prepared to change it's geopolitical positon or it's position on huge financial interests in certain regions to protect the people better against terrorism.In Britain we've lost how many people to terrorism? A few hundred maybe in the last decade? And for that, you'd hand over your right to privacy?
Everyone deserves a trial and to be treated humanely by the state. If we ever stop doing that, then how would we even know who the terrorists are anymore?
I'm not saying that the problem are the immigrants. I'm saying that the commom factor is the religion extremism. Sometimes, I don't even know if i should be called extremism, because the passages in the quran are quite clear about infidels.
The no-go zones are explained at the post above, but if we could focus on the main point of the post, I think it would be better.