Man Utd set to appoint Director of Football (when hell freezes over)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm talking about before his signing, I have no idea why we bought him and even less why we thought that 30m were acceptable. As for your question, Mourinho has signed a lot of different players and I can't really tell you what a Mourinho player is, I don't think that he is weaker than a young Varane who admittedly was very smart for his age which allowed him to catch up physically in his early 20s.

Honestly, I'm a little bit shocked that we are now trying to put the questionable signings on someone else than Mourinho while he obviously keep the good ones.

I don't remember Mourinho having a defender that's weak physically and can't head a ball tbh. Lindelof looks like more of a Pep defender than a Mourinho one.

When did I classify signings ? Lindelof most probably was on Mourinho list of defenders but in the bottom of it.
 
Martial getting fined for going AWOL/attending the birth of his child. However you want to look at it.

Pogba and Raiola conspiring to unsettle and disrespect the club to force a move.

Humbled by Brighton.

And now another plane protest.

It's August.

We've become a comedy club like Arsenal or Liverpool when they were shit.
 
Even if Mourinho is the one you fault, Ed is the one who hired him and gave him a contract extension last season, no ?

Ed will be on the blame side whatever perspective you can look at.
Hired and fired Moyes. Hired and fired LVG. Hired and refused to back Mourinho in the window just closed.

If he fires Mourinho, who will he hire and fire next?
 
Hired and fired Moyes. Hired and fired LVG. Hired and refused to back Mourinho in the window just closed.

If he fires Mourinho, who will he hire and fire next?

Exactly. This circus starts and ends with Ed. Impossible to not blame him at this stage.
 
Even if Mourinho is the one you fault, Ed is the one who hired him and gave him a contract extension last season, no ?

Ed will be on the blame side whatever perspective you can look at.
So what good is a banner going to do? Ed made the mistake, but loads of fans (me included) were willing to take a chance on him thinking he might change a bit, especially given his last season at Chelsea. Isn't it reasonable to think that maybe Ed thought the same thing? Can you totally blame him for that? Maybe us fans need to take some responsibility as well as you had people booing LVG and chanting for Jose thinking he would do the business. Ed went out and gave most of the fans what they wanted.

He then went on and gave Jose loads of money to spend. Is it his fault that we're now entering Jose's third season and we still don't have a cohesive system in place?

The only thing I blame Ed for is falling for Jose's con job and giving him an extension. A few phone calls would have told him PSG weren't looking to hire Jose.
He should have also known how Jose operates. He'd just recently done it at Chelsea, signed a lucrative extension, and then proceeded to have a meltdown, putting the club in jeopardy.
 
I don't remember Mourinho having a defender that's weak physically and can't head a ball tbh. Lindelof looks like more of a Pep defender than a Mourinho one.

When did I classify signings ? Lindelof most probably was on Mourinho list of defenders but in the bottom of it.

Maybe, like I said I don't know what a Mourinho defender is. Ricardo Carvalho wasn't particularly strong but was good on the ball and had great positioning, young Varane played a lot for a teenager and wasn't particularly strong, Lucio was strong and fast but questionable defensively. I feel that Mourinho has had different type of defenders some fast, some tall, some relatively small, some good on the ball, others good in the air. I just don't know.
 
Even if Mourinho is the one you fault, Ed is the one who hired him and gave him a contract extension last season, no ?

Ed will be on the blame side whatever perspective you can look at.

I keep seeing this- it’s Ed’s fault mourinho is crap as Ed hired him. So if you apply for a job you want, you manage to get it then are found to be crap at it, is it your fault or the employers? I think it’s yours:
 
Anyway United's share price is at an all time high. We've recently signed 2 or 3 more sponsors. If they think a banner is going to have any impact on that kind of bottom line, then they are completely naive.
 
So what good is a banner going to do? Ed made the mistake, but loads of fans (me included) were willing to take a chance on him thinking he might change a bit, especially given his last season at Chelsea. Isn't it reasonable to think that maybe Ed thought the same thing? Can you totally blame him for that? Maybe us fans need to take some responsibility as well as you had people booing LVG and chanting for Jose thinking he would do the business. Ed went out and gave most of the fans what they wanted.

He then went on and gave Jose loads of money to spend. Is it his fault that we're now entering Jose's third season and we still don't have a cohesive system in place?

The only thing I blame Ed for is falling for Jose's con job and giving him an extension. A few phone calls would have told him PSG weren't looking to hire Jose.
He should have also known how Jose operates. He'd just recently done it at Chelsea, signed a lucrative extension, and then proceeded to have a meltdown, putting the club in jeopardy.

See ? He ended at the blame side anyway despite you trying to defend him. Exactly my point. Impossible to not blame him at this stage whatever your opinion on Mourinho.

The banner isn't going to change anything but it's good for the fans to express their view for everyone.
 
I don't mind that banner to be honest. It's more dignified than the whole Pogba FC brigade. I'm just going to have the popcorn ready for Ed's next briefing to the media. Wonder how he'll react.

He'll release a diss track,

I'm upset
Just a banner for my head, its disrespect
So offended I had to double check
Ima always take the Glazers over the fans
That's why they need me out the way
I suspect
 
Reading here, you'd have to say that Woodward has the most loyal and passionate fans in the whole club. Who knew that accountants had groupies?


Some of the posts Ive read recently defending Ed and the Glazers here are really puzzling to say the least.
 
Maybe, like I said I don't know what a Mourinho defender is. Ricardo Carvalho wasn't particularly strong but was good on the ball and had great positioning, young Varane played a lot for a teenager and wasn't particularly strong, Lucio was strong and fast but questionable defensively. I feel that Mourinho has had different type of defenders some fast, some tall, some relatively small, some good on the ball, others good in the air. I just don't know.

All of these were stronger than Lindelof imo. For a team who is going to set a tight and compact defense you'll expect defenders to not get destroyed physically that easily. Lindelof strikes me as a defender in a system not relaying on defending much but on building from the back like Pep one, not a Mourinho one but it's opinions anyway.
 
Anyway United's share price is at an all time high. We've recently signed 2 or 3 more sponsors. If they think a banner is going to have any impact on that kind of bottom line, then they are completely naive.

Their share price is at an all time high because the United brand is extremely strong and yeah, a plane banner and even a few more trophyless seasons beyond this wouldn't materially harm our name.

That said, a publicised sign of unrest will cause a lot of uncertainty with the club and it will probably push for a conversation towards "on the pitch" matters by the higher ups.

I'm not for a plane banner FWIW but I can sort of see why it's being coined.
 
I keep seeing this- it’s Ed’s fault mourinho is crap as Ed hired him. So if you apply for a job you want, you manage to get it then are found to be crap at it, is it your fault or the employers? I think it’s yours:

Why did he give him contract extension midway through last season if Mourinho was crap then ?

Give me one reasonable explanation for giving Mourinho contract extension then refusing to back him 6 months later. How can both happen in one year exactly ? Complete circus.

And if Mourinho ends up failing, that'll be second manager to be hired and fail under Ed, so questions will need to be asked about him at this point.
 
See ? He ended at the blame side anyway despite you trying to defend him. Exactly my point. Impossible to not blame him at this stage whatever your opinion on Mourinho.

The banner isn't going to change anything but it's good for the fans to express their view for everyone.
That banner is not indicative of how all the fans view things. I didn't say Ed didn't have any responsibility, however our main issue at this time is JOSE and his inept coaching. No matter what else is going on at the club, he's not executing his job properly. When will you stop trying to throw everyone else under the bus just to protect Jose? Seriously, are you related to him?

I don't want fans going after Ed like this because it provides a way for Jose to go blameless and make him think what he's doing is right. That is not good for the club.
 
I personally think loosing Gill was the same loss to Utd or worse than loosing Fergie.
We have been shambolic and directionless since they left.

I have no expectations that they will do this right ...
 
That banner is not indicative of how all the fans view things. I didn't say Ed didn't have any responsibility, however our main issue at this time is JOSE and his inept coaching. No matter what else is going on at the club, he's not executing his job properly. When will you stop trying to throw everyone else under the bus just to protect Jose? Seriously, are you related to him?

I don't want fans going after Ed like this because it provides a way for Jose to go blameless and make him think what he's doing is right. That is not good for the club.

Why didn't he sack him in summer then ?
 
Reading here, you'd have to say that Woodward has the most loyal and passionate fans in the whole club. Who knew that accountants had groupies?
His support is getting stronger by the day. Might even surpass the Martial brigade.
 
Hired and fired Moyes. Hired and fired LVG. Hired and refused to back Mourinho in the window just closed.

If he fires Mourinho, who will he hire and fire next?

The circus option is clearly Zidane.
Huge name, which'll maximise publicity and sponsorship.

The best option? Who knows these days!
 
That banner is not indicative of how all the fans view things. I didn't say Ed didn't have any responsibility, however our main issue at this time is JOSE and his inept coaching. No matter what else is going on at the club, he's not executing his job properly. When will you stop trying to throw everyone else under the bus just to protect Jose? Seriously, are you related to him?

I don't want fans going after Ed like this because it provides a way for Jose to go blameless and make him think what he's doing is right. That is not good for the club.
Moyes was at fault first(he was indeed). Then LvG was. Then Jose is. Yet the person who hired them all is completely abolished from any fault in this. Not to mention giving them long contracts, or renewing them and then firing them.
 
Martial getting fined for going AWOL/attending the birth of his child. However you want to look at it.

Pogba and Raiola conspiring to unsettle and disrespect the club to force a move.

Humbled by Brighton.

And now another plane protest.

It's August.

We've become a comedy club like Arsenal or Liverpool when they were shit.

I'm late to the party,what plane protest ?
 
It's hard to blame him too much, like it or not he's employed to get the maximum profit for our owners, and he's gone down the road of spending huge amounts for very little reward already, so i'm not sure I blame him for getting jittery when Jose targets questionable players in a position he has already spent plenty in, afterall he wants to keep his job, and is only answerable to the Glazer's.

Jose however is employed to get the maximum from his team, sign the right players, improve players, and entertain..
 
It's been widely reported that Lindelof and Sanchez were not chosen by Mou.
im only going off a recent fulltime devils interview in the last week, where the guy said Pogba and Sanchez were driven by Woodward. Pogba was 2 years in the making, and Sanchez made sense to break into the South American market
 
Still waiting for someone to explain to me the logic of giving the manager a contract extension then publicly refusing to back him in the next transfer window.

Apparently someone who sets up noodle sponsorships is more qualified to judge the worth of transfer targets than a vastly experienced manager.
Because Mourinho's agent was spreading news that PSG were in for him and how he liked their project. So the club were in a sense forced to give him a contract because they didn't want to look like they didnt back Mourinho
 
Why did he give him contract extension midway through last season if Mourinho was crap then ?

Give me one reasonable explanation for giving Mourinho contract extension then refusing to back him 6 months later. How can both happen in one year exactly ? Complete circus.

And if Mourinho ends up failing, that'll be second manager to be hired and fail under Ed, so questions will need to be asked about him at this point.

Oh to be privy to the real truth!

It's probably no more mysterious than Jose giving Woody a list of names, him getting stuck into negotiations, then late on thinking, you know what, Maguire for £70m? I think we'll do with the 2x£30m centre backs we've bought the last two years, plus Smalling, Jones and Rojo.
Having already shelled £50m, a not exactly unsubstantial sum, probably our 3rd highest fee in history, for Fred?
 
I keep seeing this- it’s Ed’s fault mourinho is crap as Ed hired him. So if you apply for a job you want, you manage to get it then are found to be crap at it, is it your fault or the employers? I think it’s yours:
Isn’t the employer job to decide who is best for the job or he just received 1 CV?
The employer or the HR would have to share the blame. It’s a misjudgment however you look at it.
 
im only going off a recent fulltime devils interview in the last week, where the guy said Pogba and Sanchez were driven by Woodward. Pogba was 2 years in the making, and Sanchez made sense to break into the South American market

That's not the platform that that beardy clown runs is it?
 
I keep seeing this- it’s Ed’s fault mourinho is crap as Ed hired him. So if you apply for a job you want, you manage to get it then are found to be crap at it, is it your fault or the employers? I think it’s yours:

If you make the same mistake 3 times surely there's a problem.
 
Why didn't he sack him in summer then ?
Clearly a mistake. Might have to do with your mate Mourinho conning the shit out of him for that extension, which means a huge payoff whether he does a good job or not.

However, the fact remains that Ed's mistake doesn't warrant a banner, and most importantly doesn't mean that Jose is absolved of his responsibility of having a proper system in play to allow his players to flourish. He incidentally earns more than a £1M a month for providing the shit we're currently viewing. Just think about that. Not just overpaid players, but overpaid manager not delivering the goods.
 
Oh to be privy to the real truth!

It's probably no more mysterious than Jose giving Woody a list of names, him getting stuck into negotiations, then late on thinking, you know what, Maguire for £70m? I think we'll do with the 2x£30m centre backs we've bought the last two years, plus Smalling, Jones and Rojo.
Having already shelled £50m, a not exactly unsubstantial sum, probably our 3rd highest fee in history, for Fred?

Pep signed Nolito, flopped, chopped him next summer and replaced him by B.Silva. He signed Bravo, flopped, broke the bank on Ederson.

Flop signings happen all the time. It's useless to keep on flops because you signed them instead of being ruthless and replace them. Fergie signed several flops and had no problem throwing them out after he gave up. You make a great deal of these flops.

And spending 70m on Maguire is far, far better than this money going into Glazers pockets.
 
He'll release a diss track,

I'm upset
Just a banner for my head, its disrespect
So offended I had to double check
Ima always take the Glazers over the fans
That's why they need me out the way
I suspect

Can't go 50/50 with no Jo
Everymouth
I'm supposed to pay his bills and get him players that he wants
 
Moyes was at fault first(he was indeed). Then LvG was. Then Jose is. Yet the person who hired them all is completely abolished from any fault in this. Not to mention giving them long contracts, or renewing them and then firing them.
I'm not saying he isn't at fault for some things. I am saying a banner is going to make feck all difference and just embarrass the bloody club. Why add more stupid drama than what's already going on? What is that going to achieve? And why give Jose a free ride in all this when he is solely responsible for our terrible performances? How is this banner against Ed going to address that problem?

It's a complete waste of time.
 
Clearly a mistake. Might have to do with your mate Mourinho conning the shit out of him for that extension, which means a huge payoff whether he does a good job or not.

However, the fact remains that Ed's mistake doesn't warrant a banner, and most importantly doesn't mean that Jose is absolved of his responsibility of having a proper system in play to allow his players to flourish. He incidentally earns more than a £1M a month for providing the shit we're currently viewing. Just think about that. Not just overpaid players, but overpaid manager not delivering the goods.

I don't understand who said Mourinho is absolved of responsibility.

My point is clear, whatever you feel about Mourinho, Ed is on the blame side anyway. If you think Mourinho has been crap here, Ed is the one who hired him, gave him contract extension then refused to sack him in summer and left the team in nutshells at the start of the season.

The point you're clearly ignoring is that Mourinho is going to leave sooner or later, just like LVG. He's not going to stay for anything longer than the next 12 months while Ed will still be here and continuing his circus going on.

This will be second managerial appointment to fall under Ed. How can you absolve him of the most blame exactly ? LVG is gone and Mourinho will follow him soon so who's next ? Should we wait for a third managerial failure under Ed to start questioning him ?
 
It's hard to blame him too much, like it or not he's employed to get the maximum profit for our owners, and he's gone down the road of spending huge amounts for very little reward already, so i'm not sure I blame him for getting jittery when Jose targets questionable players in a position he has already spent plenty in, afterall he wants to keep his job, and is only answerable to the Glazer's.

Jose however is employed to get the maximum from his team, sign the right players, improve players, and entertain..
Absolutely this.
 
Pep signed Nolito, flopped, chopped him next summer and replaced him by B.Silva. He signed Bravo, flopped, broke the bank on Ederson.

Flop signings happen all the time. It's useless to keep on flops because you signed them instead of being ruthless and replace them. Fergie signed several flops and had no problem throwing them out after he gave up. You make a great deal of these flops.

And spending 70m on Maguire is far, far better than this money going into Glazers pockets.

I'm amazed at the number of Utd "fans" who are happy to side with the board on this issue and simply argue "well, they're your signings so make them play better if you're any good at managing." So many people seem to be anti-Mourinho ahead of being pro-Utd, and are actaully pretty chuffed that we aren't giving our manager money to spend.
 
Last edited:
I for one, welcome The Plane Banner.

I just wanna be entertained by something, not because I agree with the sentiment or think it's the right thing to do. Like the old adage says, if you dont laugh you'll cry. I'd rather laugh along with my non-United mates on the plane matter than frustrate myself trying to defend it or defend the club that's clearly on a slippery slope to nowhere.
I think anyone connected with the banner should be banned from OT for 10 years at least. It would make us look even more desperate than we already are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.