ash_86
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2013
- Messages
- 6,370
the last big signing from the Dutch league to England that worked was Suarez, pretty much everyone since has flopped big time
Eriksen?
the last big signing from the Dutch league to England that worked was Suarez, pretty much everyone since has flopped big time
Than why do we go for him just after 12 months for 3 times more money?Yeah since we've gotten Maguire in the season Hull got relegated I'm sure they indeed don't think like me.
Guy was very solid. 80 goals conceded solid. For Hull. Christ almighty. On second thought, I'd love to see the reactions if we actually brought him in here after the said season. Shit would've been hilarious around here given the current state of affairs.
Great logic that mate. We signed Roy Keane from a relagated Nottingham Forest. What a disaster that turned out to be.Yeah good luck with this bullshit, if we signed a defender from a relegated Hull who conceded 80 goals people would call us unambitious shambles and the call would've been questionable to say the least at that time.
luckily I left myself that out, Eriksen and Suarez in what 10 years? not a great recordEriksen?
Than why do we go for him just after 12 months for 3 times more money?
Did he magically got his qualities in 12 months? What are they thinking now? The manager, Woodward, the board?
Do they think, wow what a smart decision did we make one year ago, because the guy was playing for Hull? And now he plays for Leicester and they are the best defense in the league, we can spend 3 times what he might have cost just last year? I bet they think like that.
There’s a reason why Liverpool got their LB for peanuts and we will pay 65m for a guy that went for 15-20m last summer.
Not this rubbish about buying players from relegated teams again. That’s already been debunked
@Kostur
I didn't even bring Mourinho into the discussion so not sure why you would, it could've been Mourinho, Woodward, the board or Fred the Red for my liking, if we transferred a defender, God forbid a central defender, from a relegated Hull who conceded 80 goals I'd be the first one to question it and by the looks of it I'm one of rather lenient guys around here.
I'm pretty sure you, alongside all those harping about why we didn't bring him in that season, were a huge admirer of Maguire back then though.
I said the one who made the decision, by all accounts it’s Mourinho. That why I brought him in the discussion, since you are so lenient you might let me through this time.
And getting a player from some team whether it’s relegated or conceded 80 goals shouldn’t be the deciding factor if a player has the potential to make the leap. Payed professionals who’s job is to evaluate that i’m sure don’t think like you.
I wasn’t a big admirer, but it was obvious the guy was very solid. That’s why i’m a regular fan, they earn their living by those decisions.
I think Keano debunked it. Debunked it good.
Varane was signed from relegated team. Bonucci, Barzagli, Benatia were all signed from the teams that conceded heavily.
Lyon were 9th best defensively when they had Umtiti and still Barca signed him.
Leicester conceded 60 goals last season, Skriniar's team conceded 55 goals before signing for Inter.
Villarreal had 15th best defensive record when Godin played for them, before moving to Atletico Madrid.
Goals conceded is not the way to judge individual defenders.
Saying that, hopefully we are not in for him. He is good player who can carry the ball from defense, but don't think he is so much better than what we have.
Than why do we go for him just after 12 months for 3 times more money?
Did he magically got his qualities in 12 months? What are they thinking now? The manager, Woodward, the board?
Do they think, wow what a smart decision did we make one year ago, because the guy was playing for Hull? And now he plays for Leicester and they are the best defense in the league, we can spend 3 times what he might have cost just last year? I bet they think like that.
There’s a reason why Liverpool got their LB for peanuts and we will pay 65m for a guy that went for 15-20m last summer.
Not this rubbish about buying players from relegated teams again. That’s already been debunked
@Kostur
actually @Kostur its fair well known he turned down Spurs last summer and came to us because of playing time
we didn't need it before the Mahrez sale
Van Aanholt is relegation fooder usually. TFM ended up as third choice right back at Palace in his only PL season.
That said. I like De Ligt but I would rather sign Maguire. The fee doesn't interest me.
What does it have to do with Liverpool spending 75m? They spent what they had to do to have the player they wanted. We are into our third summer buying a CB again. And someone needs to answer that baffling planning.This post is pure buffoonery. Especially when Liverpool themselves spent 75m for a centre back!
or he thought to himself "they have Alderweiald and Vertongen and they won't be getting dropped, its world cup year and England don't have loads of CB's I need to be playing and maybe I can get in the squad!"I'm obviously going to take your word for it here given I don't follow your team's transfer speculations but still, if he was good enough back then he'd have gone to Spurs and fought his place. He wouldn't have if you asked me, perhaps ahead of Sanchez, but he's made the logical decision not to jump too high, which is again fair fecks.
maybe if you take a second mortgage out on Old Trafford and CarringtonSo what you’re saying is we have a good chance of getting slabhead?
Not that I particularly want him to be honest.
or he thought to himself "they have Alderweiald and Vertongen and they won't be getting dropped, its world cup year and England don't have loads of CB's I need to be playing and maybe I can get in the squad!"
do we have a better left back than van Aanholt?
Seem to recall he and that unknown kid at RB absolutely destroying us all game when we played Crystal Palace once this season. Pretty sure I actually asked who would swap are current fullback options for those 2.Yes? Don't think anyone on this forum (the majority of which want rid of Young) would swap him for Van Aanholt. They probably wouldn't even swap him for Shaw.
I hope you're right if we do end up buying Maguire. In my opinion he's on par with our current lot of CBs.I'd have took VVD for that and am hoping we take Maguire for this! The types of CBs we need.
Seem to recall he and that unknown kid at RB absolutely destroying us all game when we played Crystal Palace once this season. Pretty sure I actually asked who would swap are current fullback options for those 2.
But as a signing suggestion nah, just think he was having a good game that day.
lets close this discussion. lets agree to disagree. Young isn't even left footed and Shaw needs some BBQ sauce on himYes? Don't think anyone on this forum (the majority of which want rid of Young) would swap him for Van Aanholt. They probably wouldn't even swap him for Shaw.
lets close this discussion. lets agree to disagree. Young isn't even left footed and Shaw needs some BBQ sauce on him
Yeah I only saw that one game against us and was super impressed by him, you’re right tho plus hopefully Dalot will get his chances and take them this season and fix that issue. I really really hope he does because I don’t think I can handle another full season of Valencia.Wan-Bissika was the unknown kid, the lad who took TFM's place in the Palace squad. He look awesome in his half dozen games at the end of last season but the question is if he keeps it up.
I'm not sure what basis people think he's a £65m defender. He's not a better pure defender than Smalling. Seems a bit slow and completely unproven in Europe. Comfortable on the ball but didn't we just buy Lindelof to do the same? Is he any better on the ball than Bailly?
No point in buying a CB unless it's a clear upgrade on who we have.
What does it have to do with Liverpool spending 75m? They spent what they had to do to have the player they wanted. We are into our third summer buying a CB again. And someone needs to answer that baffling planning.
I'm not sure what basis people think he's a £65m defender. He's not a better pure defender than Smalling. Seems a bit slow and completely unproven in Europe. Comfortable on the ball but didn't we just buy Lindelof to do the same? Is he any better on the ball than Bailly?
No point in buying a CB unless it's a clear upgrade on who we have.