Wumminator
The Qatar Pounder
Put a tenner on them losing 8-0 tonight.
I said when he was purchased and still to this day that Emre Can is Javi Garcia mark II. He isn't quick enough to be a top DM in the Premier League
You also thought that Liverpool will "go again" this year and challenge for the title. So I obviously take your expertise only with a pinch of salt.
I watch one of your preseason games where he came on in the second half. Dont remember against who it was. He did absolutely nothing special whatsoever for 30 minutes (a couple of backward passes and one run) and rawk turned into a wankfest about his performance. I had no idea why, but I guess every player who joins liverpool has to be worldclass.
It all comes down to what you call a "successful signing". A player with similar qualities like Henderson, but slightly more defensive? Thats still possible. You are completely deluded, if you think that he turns out better than this.
It's a good thing he's only been played there once! He's significantly better with the ball than Javi Garcia (he can dribble quite well for instance).
Oooh. Ignoring the first little dig.
They certainly don't. In fact that statement couldn't be more wrong. Have you seen the treatment Lovren and Balotelli have been getting on RAWK? Also, it's probably a confirmation bias with you and Can.
Henderson looks a bargain at £16m. Would gladly take Can becoming another Henderson, but they aren't that similar from what I've seen. Ok, I'm deluded! I only wish I could be more like you mate and be the voice of reason. We'll see who's right in a few years I suppose.
He's improved from atrocious to mediocre, I'll give you that.To be fair I would say Henderson is probably the most improved player in the Premier League over the last few years, Seems to be getting better every year. This coming from someone that thought he was atrocious watching him in the England under 21's a few years ago.
Henderson mediocre? Wtf?He's improved from atrocious to mediocre, I'll give you that.
It's a good thing he's only been played there once! He's significantly better with the ball than Javi Garcia (he can dribble quite well for instance).
Oooh. Ignoring the first little dig.
They certainly don't. In fact that statement couldn't be more wrong. Have you seen the treatment Lovren and Balotelli have been getting on RAWK? Also, it's probably a confirmation bias with you and Can.
Henderson looks a bargain at £16m. Would gladly take Can becoming another Henderson, but they aren't that similar from what I've seen. Ok, I'm deluded! I only wish I could be more like you mate and be the voice of reason. We'll see who's right in a few years I suppose.
The guy is twenty years old. There is absolutely no way you can be sure how good he'll be in a couple of years.It all comes down to what you call a "successful signing". A player with similar qualities like Henderson, but slightly more defensive? Thats still possible. You are completely deluded, if you think that he turns out better than this.
He's improved from atrocious to mediocre, I'll give you that.
When Lovren and Balotelli were signed, most liverpool supporter were incredible excited. Mario was up there with the very best and Lovren was the missing quality in defence. Only after a couple of terrible performances rawk turned on them. Can just didnt get the same opportunity yet due to his injury.
Dont be too salty. Next year is your year. yawn.
The guy is twenty years old. There is absolutely no way you can be sure how good he'll be in a couple of years.
On here, no one was reserved on Lovren.
I'd also say it's vaguely disrespectful to the competition and to the travelling fans to field a weakened team at the Bernabeu, even though it might make sense in the grand scheme of things (not that I think it'll change much against Chelsea).
Henderson is a nice addition for teams that wants to challenge for titles - a good teamplayer you eventually need - but he wouldnt look out of place playing for a midtable team.
When Lovren was transferred, I remember discussing him with many Liverpool fans on here (maybe you too?) and he was never considered to be a great signing in comparison with other transfers. He was considered a great signing because he was apparently one of the best CBs in the league last year (which was revisionism at the very least, and short sighted). He was going to be the solution to your defensive woes, and there was really no middle ground on him. I seem to recall you also raving about his first performance(s) even though he'd been mediocre.Nope, I'll be the first to hold my hands up and say I was happy enough with him especially compared to the other shite that was being transferred like Vermaelan, Rojo and the overpriced Mangala and Luiz.
I'll have to disagree on that one. Henderson has transformed into an excellent midfielder.Henderson is a nice addition for teams that wants to challenge for titles - a good teamplayer you eventually need - but he wouldnt look out of place playing for a midtable team.
What has happened to the "Red Cafu"?
When Lovren was transferred, I remember discussing him with many Liverpool fans on here (maybe you too?) and he was never considered to be a great signing in comparison with other transfers. He was considered a great signing because he was apparently one of the best CBs in the league last year (which was revisionism at the very least, and short sighted). He was going to be the solution to your defensive woes, and there was really no middle ground on him. I seem to recall you also raving about his first performance(s) even though he'd been mediocre.
you're absolutely spot on Barney. He was named in here a grand total of one time, by alastair, in his 'overrated XI' list. Very heavily indeed.Would you like me to pull up people's team of the seasons last year? Lovren featured heavily.
It's borderline disgraceful in my eyes. Basically forfeiting this game.I'd also say it's vaguely disrespectful to the competition and to the travelling fans to field a weakened team at the Bernabeu, even though it might make sense in the grand scheme of things (not that I think it'll change much against Chelsea).
Without the dosh and PL place you simply can't attract/afford to buy, the better players. Basically it's qualifying for it means $$$ and progressing through to the last 16/8 means $. Ergo qualifying is more important than progressing.To be fair, it may be that the word has come down from on high that getting into next year's CL is more important than progressing in this year's. Not a dig at Rodgers or his team, because that is how many modern chairmen/owners think; to them, the game is only incidentally about glory.
Well, Liverpool can't attract top players regardless of where they finish, to be fair.Without the dosh and PL place you simply can't attract/afford to buy, the better players. Basically it's qualifying for it means $$$ and progressing through to the last 16/8 means $. Ergo qualifying is more important than progressing.
Can will never be a standout player in the EPL. I said this long before the transfer happened. He is just not that good. At the very best he´ll turn into a defensive version of henderson, but even for that he still has a long way to go.
Spot on. With everything above. The problem is Lovren was / is supposed to be that leader. We can only hope that he recovers his form of the 2nd half of last season and shows that he is indeed the leader we expected.Lovren is a decent defender imo, though perhaps £20m was a little steep.
The issue with Liverpool at the moment (and us to a certain extent) is that there doesn't seem to be a recognisable system/setup and no real leader at the back barking instructions to people. You could put much better players than Lovren in there and the end result would probably be the same.
Well, Liverpool can't attract top players regardless of where they finish, to be fair.
Put a tenner on them losing 8-0 tonight.
Well actually you could afford Di Maria, you spent £120m, only £30m less than us, this summer. You could also afford Sanchez (who reportedly rejected you), Fabregas, Costa etc. Basically according to your summer spending spree and recent activity you could most definitely afford pretty much every top player who has moved into the premier league.Naughty, naughty. If you mean can we afford to pay £65m for a Di Maria and the salary Falcao demanded ... no, you'd be absolutely right saying that. However can we attract top quality players (and in my dictionary, and that of most fans, there is a distinction between a 'top quality player' and a 'world class star') then undoubtedly that would be a yes.
Do UEFA have any rules about fielding a weakened team? I know there was uproar a few seasons back when the FA went after a club for doing it.
Do UEFA have any rules about fielding a weakened team? I know there was uproar a few seasons back when the FA went after a club for doing it.
Naughty, naughty. If you mean can we afford to pay £65m for a Di Maria and the salary Falcao demanded ... no, you'd be absolutely right saying that. However can we attract top quality players (and in my dictionary, and that of most fans, there is a distinction between a 'top quality player' and a 'world class star') then undoubtedly that would be a yes.
Well actually you could afford Di Maria, you spent £120m, only £30m less than us, this summer. You could also afford Sanchez (who reportedly rejected you), Fabregas, Costa etc. Basically according to your summer spending spree and recent activity you could most definitely afford pretty much every top player who has moved into the premier league.
So yeah, you can't attract them.
That's why I left out Falcao.You completely ignored where he mentioned wages...
So instead of singing 6-7 average players why not sign 2-3 top players?You completely ignored where he mentioned wages...