Ten hag didn't semi crack it. We had a good run of form but were terrible after the cup final and that season was really poor in terms of the quality of teams.
Claiming ruud did well because he had a few easy games isnalso pretty fanciful
We might be slightly better with a back 4 but would stoll be bad. Martinez had a good 6 months but has since been injured or a liability and clearly isn't someone any top 6 team would play at centre back
Just listen to the quotes about him at the time though… it was all the complete opposite.
And I’m not even necessarily disagreeing with you about the other top 6 teams… my point is simply about playing to the strengths of players… my points on Martinez stand in that regard.
It’s no different in that Rashford has only ever looked consistently good in a counter focused side, running on to play from the left, with an overlapping FB
It’s no different that Bruno has only ever looked consistently in a free role 10 with runners to release either side.
It’s no different that Casemiro looked better when we defended deep and compact to limit the amount of open ground he has to cover
It’s no different that Dalot only ever looks consistent as a traditional, overlapping RB
It just so happens that a lot of our team is suited to the system that ETH stumbled on after those first 2 terrible losses in season one.
Amorim can have as many training sessions as he wants. Rashford isn’t going to become competent at intricate build up. Casemiro and Martinez aren’t going to suddenly become more athletic. Dalot isn’t going to become a left winger.
The only players you can make a good argument for as potentially being better suited to this system are Amad, Ugarte, and maybe Maz at a push at RCB… but I’d argue he would be equally good as a traditional FB as seen under ETH.
Are we going to sign 10 new players to make this system work?