Cathy Ferguson
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2010
- Messages
- 4,424
Had all time in the world to mark Semenya but decided to mark space instead.
You mean his best position is where he’s expected to win headers against the oppositions striker?He fits in only one position in this formation and that is in the middle of the 3 CBs. Playing him on either side is misusing him because he simply is not quick enough to play in those positions. Its so easy to see yet he keeps getting played there.
If he is not the best middle CB in the squad then he should not be playing. Simple as that.
Or last season. Just part of his first season tbhA shadow of his former self. I used to love the assurance in his game and his confidence had a positive impact on the team.. not this season.
Or last season. Just part of his first season tbh
Not sure any of those had a cracking first season? Decent spells but never any sort of length.Just not the same player. How many CBs have we had in recent years to have cracking first seasons then fade for whatever reason?
Billy, Lindelof, Rojo, etc
Agree. He has good forward passes, but every other team have CBs who can hit those passes as well. And he is often painfully slow on the ball, just like all our CBs. We need to move around the ball quicker at the back.Watching Bournemouth today, Huijsen and Zabarnyi are both absolute athletes, monsters, and ALSO good on on the ball. Meanwhile we act like Lisandro is the only CB in the league capable of making a forward a pass so we just have to deal with his laundry list of very obvious weaknesses.
Good post, and the big problem he has is that the position he now plays asks so many questions of his defensive reading of the game - especially in lieu of his athletic limitations - and anticipation to cover for it, or not make a molehill a mountain, that it exposes him and highlights the things he isn't good at, or might even be better to say, things he's bad at.I do agree with this and it's been an issue dating back to Maguire being signed under Ole.
As far as Martinez goes, he's yet another poor athlete that can't really hack it consistently enough in this league to be worthy of a top team. Brilliant on the ball without a doubt, but he essentially has to defend like prime Franco Baresi with his anticipation and tackling to not end up being a liability at the back because of how little room for error he has.
Funny. A succinct version.You mean his best position is where he’s expected to win headers against the oppositions striker?
His best position is when Shaw is in the team, as he can compensate for him, but only in a back 4 formation.
Love the guys attitude, but he’s 100% a square peg in a round hole and with the team rebuild he needs to be moved on.
Weren't Lindelof and Rojo pretty much dire from the start?Just not the same player. How many CBs have we had in recent years to have cracking first seasons then fade for whatever reason?
Billy, Lindelof, Rojo, etc
Lindelof and Rojo were never good.Just not the same player. How many CBs have we had in recent years to have cracking first seasons then fade for whatever reason?
Billy, Lindelof, Rojo, etc
He should have been tighter to his man on the 3rd goal and it isnt the first time hes made a mistake like that
However I dont think he played poorly overall. If you're a CB in a 3 and you've made 6 tackles, 4 clearances and 1 blocked shot then you've done quite well and have been asked to do too much. The other CBs has nowhere near that
Lindelof had a cracking first season?Just not the same player. How many CBs have we had in recent years to have cracking first seasons then fade for whatever reason?
Billy, Lindelof, Rojo, etc
Agreed fully and it’s frustrating because for all of his faults, he’s probably the “most successful” ETH signing yet he’s another that doesn’t fit into future plans.Good post, and the big problem he has is that the position he now plays asks so many questions of his defensive reading of the game - especially in lieu of his athletic limitations - and anticipation to cover for it, or not make a molehill a mountain, that it exposes him and highlights the things he isn't good at, or might even be better to say, things he's bad at.
He needs the security of a full-back flanking and taking care of wide attackers. He's our worst equipped CB to deal with direct 1-on-1's or covering vast amounts of space. It's actually making him doubt himself because he's fully aware of his own flaws and is not comfortable with stick or twist.
A back 3 leaves him nowhere to play; he isn't a central CB due to his poor reading of the game in front of him and that wide LCB berth is just going to expose him more and more, especially now that teams are cottoning on to targeting either him, or his side of the pitch for an easy/easier in.
Quite a few are mentioning he needs to be at the very top of his game to cope. I fear injuries have robbed him of the extra level he initially came here with and he doesn't have tools to compensate for it. When you're already disadvantaged in a position, you've no margin for error. His height being an issue is overblown, but what all the legendary small CB's have is extraordinary facets to their game, be it: the salmon leap; impeccable agility; peak levels of anticipatory action; mindblowing speed and short burst acceleration; robust, tank like physiques - they all have their lane and a defensive edge that Martinez does not. Baresi, Passarella, Cordoba, Ayala, Cannavaro, Puyol, Mascherano, Chumpitaz... the list can extend, but the properties won't and even those who weren't athletic specimens in their own way, had a level of anticipation and reading of play that negated and countered problems at source. Martinez does not.
Height only becomes an issue when it becomes an issue and before that, it's a load of cliches and almost prejudices, but you cannot be slow, short, lacking agility and be a poor reader of play or have reduced anticipation all wrapped up in a short player in such a crucial position where he will be primed for targeting. The set piece issues are extensions of the wider issue, and again show he doesn't have that sixth sense for where to be and what to do that the aforementioned above did to really offset being short.
The 3-man backline is the death of Martinez here, I feel. The player he came here as pre-injury might have stood a chance, but this one, with the physical limitations he has is a nomad, and with a fully fit Shaw, wouldn't get any playing time. I think he's going to be one of the first out the door come the summer.
Funny. A succinct version.
He may go on to do well at a Barca or Real where the demands are not so extreme and constant and he gets to exhibit his passing and incisiveness more often, but he’s got a serious uphill battle here and we don’t have the means to carry anyone, let alone a player in a crucial position. The back 3 just feels like the death of him.Agreed fully and it’s frustrating because for all of his faults, he’s probably the “most successful” ETH signing yet he’s another that doesn’t fit into future plans.
Bummer because I do think he’s world class on the ball as a progressor and he’s very fun to watch, but that’s not enough especially in the PL when the team isn’t keeping the ball like prime Barca and physical traits are so important where he ends up being a liability. It ends up being a net negative ultimately.
Wonder what his value is on the open market. CV is pretty good that maybe a big club will bite and we get most of his fee backHe may go on to do well at a Barca or Real where the demands are not so extreme and constant and he gets to exhibit his passing and incisiveness more often, but he’s got a serious uphill battle here and we don’t have the means to carry anyone, let alone a player in a crucial position. The back 3 just feels like the death of him.
To be fair, all of our players are performing terrible at the moment. I think he is a good player and we would do well to keep him.Not good enough. If those Madrid rumours are true, sell him.
I agree that ge doesn’t fit this system but I think his best role would be in the middle of the 3. He struggles defending the channels and when he gets pulled wide. This would eliminate that. His aerial ability as a middle of the three would be no different than if he were playing in a back two and nobody had a problem with that. The only issue I see is that it eliminates a lot of what makes him great on the ball and in possession. And we have nobody that’s better to play the LCB role. Moving De Ligt over there doesn’t make sense.You mean his best position is where he’s expected to win headers against the oppositions striker?
His best position is when Shaw is in the team, as he can compensate for him, but only in a back 4 formation.
Love the guys attitude, but he’s 100% a square peg in a round hole and with the team rebuild he needs to be moved on.
Shaw is better suited for the role but can't stay fit. Martinez isn't going to do well playing in the middle as he's not great in the air and we'd make the left a bigger issue if we moved him centrally. So he's going to look bad until he's replaced by someone more suited. I think his days are numbered, like many others if United stick with Ruben.I agree that ge doesn’t fit this system but I think his best role would be in the middle of the 3. He struggles defending the channels and when he gets pulled wide. This would eliminate that. His aerial ability as a middle of the three would be no different than if he were playing in a back two and nobody had a problem with that. The only issue I see is that it eliminates a lot of what makes him great on the ball and in possession. And we have nobody that’s better to play the LCB role. Moving De Ligt over there doesn’t make sense.
He may go on to do well at a Barca or Real where the demands are not so extreme and constant and he gets to exhibit his passing and incisiveness more often, but he’s got a serious uphill battle here and we don’t have the means to carry anyone, let alone a player in a crucial position. The back 3 just feels like the death of him.
Yep, I agree. He is not a good defender. Admirable attitude and decent on the ball but not good enough.He's absolutely rubbish. I'm sick of the obsession with ball playing defenders, bring back no nonsense defenders like Vidic that's what we need.
He wasnt very good in a back 4 either though, for a long while at leastHe doesn’t seem to be loving the 3 at the back formation which is surprising…maybe just teething problems.
He's absolutely rubbish. I'm sick of the obsession with ball playing defenders, bring back no nonsense defenders like Vidic that's what we need.
A back 3 leaves him nowhere to play; he isn't a central CB due to his poor reading of the game in front of him and that wide LCB berth is just going to expose him more and more, especially now that teams are cottoning on to targeting either him, or his side of the pitch for an easy/easier in.