OleBoiii
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2019
- Messages
- 6,021
Well he wasn’t resigning until all this was he? He’s not the type. Messi has done for him. The rights and wrongs of that are up for debate and Bartemou makes Woody look competent but Messi being bigger than Barcelona is also part of their problem I think. It’s not a good situation at all.
Anyway, this is all finished now. To the Sancho thread!
Source?
Can’t see him coming to the premiership, but if he does maybe City won’t be the favourites.
Think about it. Pep’s tactics at City are different to when he was at Barca, you can’t carry a player in that system defensively. Everyone needs to defend from the top. Will Messi do that? No.
So they’d have to change the way they play considerably. Maybe Pep isn’t even interested. City have a clear identity to their game, worked on it for years, will they change it for Messi? It’s a big call.
Chelsea could afford him, their rigid style doesn’t suit in my opinion. Also the individual players there are very good, but I feel United have a better drawer at the moment.
United. Blockbuster signing, record shirt sales, Messi decides to prove critics wrong that he can only do it in La Liga.
We can afford him. £1 million a week for 3 years is less than the Sancho deal would’ve been. Plus we’ve already saved half of that getting rid of Sanchez.
Think of the return on investment in merchandise, globally.
Also the lasting effect on the reputation of United around the world for fans, future Lionel Messi’s. Commercially without question it would be amazing.
Now consider the playing style. Let’s be realistic here. We haven’t really got one, whereas City have a clear identity (as do Liverpool but they can not afford him).
Normally this is a disadvantage. Here it’s a clear advantage. We can build the team around him for the next 3-4 years.
Factor in Messi would have the likes of Bruno Fernandes, Paul Pogba, Anthony Martial, Marcus Rashford, around him. Pace, creativity, the ability to work with Messi is immense.
Joining PSG would give Messi a good chance of another Champions League medal. That is true. But on the whole it would be seen as a step backwards for his career. It’s not a challenge someone who wants to be remembered as the greatest ever would take. It’s too easy. It would make Ronaldo look superior in that respect.
Joining Juventus is another possibility. Imagine him and Ronaldo in the same team, that would be something to behold. It could be more of a lure than PSG for him.
But if he really wants to prove himself, where many people say he couldn’t succeed, in England then for the reasons above I feel that United would be the best club for Messi and Messi the best signing United could make.
Not just for the now, but the statement, the blockbuster amazement of it, would benefit United for years to come, long after Messi as it would by reputation put us right back up there with fans, sponsors and importantly future footballers, who would again dream of playing for United.
(It’s a dream Ed, but come on, make it happen!)
He is a classic Woodward signing. Over the hill but sells shirts. He plays in positions where we have good players already. Still I wouldn't say no, just for the buzz.
Surely he will go play in Italy where you can zimmer around all day and nobody cares?
He's in no way over the hill.He is a classic Woodward signing. Over the hill but sells shirts. He plays in positions where we have good players already. Still I wouldn't say no, just for the buzz.
Surely he will go play in Italy where you can zimmer around all day and nobody cares?
Ah alright. I think that’s what will happen, Bartomeu will resign and Messi will be pacified.Quite a few outlets now reporting it as a power play in order to get the President to step down. Unconfirmed rumours that he's agreed to as well.
I think he probably knows that his life could well not be safe if he's the man to go down in history as the man who sold Messi. Catalans already hate him as it is for the last few years and his wreck less spending.
Either a 700M release clause....or leave for free. Yeah, a bit oddIt's interesting as to why Messi has that clause in the first place. Obviously he thought there may be circumstances in the future which mean he would want to leave (i.e. wasn't fully dedicated to the club no matter what).
Yeah, like one of those notes you find in a horror game.The lighting in that picture makes it look so sinister
Maybe they’ll do a straight swap for David Brooks?I hope we sign him.
He might leave for free if that clause can be interpreted at the end of the season legally.
Reckon it'll be Messi coming to Paris and Neymar going the other way.
Messi wants to win the CL with a club that can make a serious challenge straight away. That's currently Bayern, Liverpool, Juve, City and PSG. Only the last two of them has the money.
But I don't see City paying the money outright. It makes sense for PSG to swap Neymar for him as it works out for all parties involved.
I enjoy the fact that their legend and captain is the first to leave the ship, leaving through the back door, after a major defeat and after the announcement of his friend's departure. Then does he leave for the sports project or for the conversation with Koeman?Bet you're loving it though. Are there other sides other than Barcelona who can challenge Madrid regularly for La Liga?
He can bench any attacking player in EPL in any position with his one leg brokenHe's in no way over the hill.
He's in no way over the hill.
Koeman though. What an absolute idiot.
He's basically a no mark and he's come in, sacked off a load of players and upset the best player of all time to the degree that he wants to terminate his contract.
This is worse than Clough at Leeds level of misjudging your position.
If he does leave, Inter (or PSG) is the obvious move. Extend the career in an easier league while simultaneously adding to your legacy with trophies elsewhere
Yeah I think that’s the biggest mark against United. Our whole team is too green. We could be on the road to something great with what Ole is building but (As unlikely as it is to happen) I can see Messi getting frustrated with the inconsistency of the team and Ole’s lack of experience pretty quickly.A very good case for us signing Messi but you forgot one thing -- our manager is Ole. After all the recent unproven manager Messi has had, I doubt playing for Ole is getting him excited.
That's my view and a massive reason Xavi went no where near the job. The lads still got vision.Eh, the players he 'told' had no future at the club were the same players who were said to be for sale by Barcelona before Koeman even came in. The way I see it, the board had made the decision and chose Koeman to be the fall guy to deliver the news so he'd getting the brunt of the fallback - though it hasn't quite worked to plan as now Messi wants to leave and Bartomeu is getting the blame. I might be seeing it all in a naive way though.
Yeah they're probably saving Xavi for the rebuild post-Messi.That's my view and a massive reason Xavi went no where near the job. The lads still got vision.
Proper game of thrones moves by Xavi.Yeah they're probably saving Xavi for the rebuild post-Messi.
Neymar left Barca precisely because he didn't want to play second fiddle to Messi. If he gets to return as the prodigal son and undisputed number one star, it'll very much work out for him.There's no way PSG are doing that swap.
Neymar wouldn't return to Barcelona with no Messi.
It clearly doesn't work out for all parties.
Eh, the players he 'told' had no future at the club were the same players who were said to be for sale by Barcelona before Koeman even came in. The way I see it, the board had made the decision and chose Koeman to be the fall guy to deliver the news so he'd getting the brunt of the fallback - though it hasn't quite worked to plan as now Messi wants to leave and Bartomeu is getting the blame. I might be seeing it all in a naive way though.
Not sure a player should have that much power.