As we know being a name means little to today's players. Seems to be more about how they're treated.
Ole treated his players how they'd like and it faltered fast. Jose treated his abominably and did much better.
Anyway, it's not about being a 'name' or 'setting the team up well', it's about results.
Potter has absolutely nothing on file to suggest he can get results United would want.
Interesting that you cite Liverpool, whose head coach has fewer credentials than our own,
Slot has not managed another top-six club into the ground. Hopefully, he will, but even if he did, Liverpool would never be so stupid as to hire a dangerously tarnished coach as Potter.
Otherwise, he'd have been a serious contender for replacing Klopp, no?
As for Maresca, sure, he is a risk, but not a proven failure like Potter.
Could you honestly see Chelsea rehire Potter if it went wrong with Maresca?
Regarding Graham Potter, I don’t think it was an accident he appeared on MNF this week. It felt like a PR exercise. He didn’t criticize ETH’s tactics or the players. Due to his connections with Ashworth, I wouldn’t be surprised to see him appointed as interim manager next week, with the view to appoint him full-time if he is successful.
Christ, mate, don't give them ideas.
Ineos hiring their mates to manage us and what will be their squad fills me with a nameless dread, and it should do you, too.
Hopefully, they're a lot smarter than this.
Hopefully.