OmarUnited4ever
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
- Messages
- 4,165
How's Sergio Conceicao? I hear he is out of job, is he any good?
Could it be he just arrived at Arsenal before their transfers were bought/settled in and the players evolved into key players? Martinelli, Saka, etc. Also didn’t he have the burden of Mustafi/Mertesacker or was that before him?I think Emery is a quality manager, however we saw at Arsenal that maybe he isn't quite cut out for the very top level of the game. Granted he may have grown from that experience, and he is definitely doing a good job at Villa. If he were to become our manager I would be in support of it even though I may feel a bit apprehensive. In a straight shot with him and Tuchel I would opt for Tuchel, but would not be disappointed with Emery.
Could it be he just arrived at Arsenal before their transfers were bought/settled in and the players evolved into key players? Martinelli, Saka, etc.
At Villa he arrived at the right time, with Watkins being fully developed. Then got the best out of matured players like Konsa, McGinn, Douglas Luiz, Bailey, etc.
I’m not sure there is a great difference in some managers like Arteta vs Emery or even ETH if he arrives at the right time. This is the struggle at United. So many players in key positions are not close to being matured/fully developed players.
While I think they could do a job in the Lewis/Stones role, it’s never been tested really with Dalot. Don’t think it has with Mazraoui neither.I highly doubt he's even on the list. Anyone worth their salt knows he's not up to it, especially tactically, but that shouldn't be a surprise. He only managed on club level for 3 years and that was 15-18 years ago as well. He wasn't anything special back then, and football is a very different sport now altogether compared to the late 2000s. He basically missed the whole tactical revolution of the last 15 years as he quit club football just when Guardiola, the biggest pioneer of said tactical revolution, basically entered the game.
It says it all, that with an overpowered squad, on international level, where tactics don't even matter as much, as it's a more "arcade" type of football, and with the competition made up mostly of washed up managers on the decline (with some rare exceptions, like Enrique, Flick, and Nagelsmann from the last few years), he somehow managed to handicap his own team in every major international tournament, with his unbalanced tactical approach.
@AkaAkuma
We targeted 2 centre backs, because Ineos clearly want to rebuild that position. Also, starting with a back 4, but switching to a back 3 during a game, especially when you have possession, has become a regular occurence lately under some of the best managers in the world. It's a cornerstone of both Pep's and Arteta's teams currently. Maresca as well, if I'm not mistaken. That's why you have centre-backs playing full-back, and full-backs who can invert into midfield next to the central midfielders: Zinchenko, Calafiori, Timber, White, Aké, Gvardiol and Lewis are all players who fit at least one of these roles. In our current squad, Martínez, Dalot, and Mazraoui are capable of playing in such a system and are very suited to it. Branthwaite too, but targeting him doesn't necessarily indicate a plan to a switch to a permanent back 3. Branthwaite and Martínez could both start games at left-back if we had both, with Martínez able to into turn into a CCB and Branthwaite into a wide defender if we switch to a back 3. They could play together because of this as well, despite both being originally left-footed CBs. And then, Mazraoui and Dalot are both great at inverting into the midfield.
Dalot/Maz can do the role as good as Kadioglu, if not better. Dalot has been inverting a lot since ETH came in, and Maz has done it tons at Ajax.While I think they could do a job in the Lewis/Stones role, it’s never been tested really with Dalot. Don’t think it has with Mazraoui neither.
Kadioglu who Brighton just signed can do this. Think we missed out on a decent player there, but money seemed a constraint.
Ah yes, marvellous. I have just the thread for you.Hasn't there been managers that have turned things around? I seem to remember a certain Scottish manager that took a while. He didn't win a bean until his forth year. Many reds calling for his head.
Dalot has hardly done it a lot. Inverting to me means playing the role of a defensive midfielder at times. He's mostly been in the role of making crosses and/or getting into positions to take a shot or two.Dalot/Maz can do the role as good as Kadioglu, if not better. Dalot has been inverting a lot since ETH came in, and Maz has done it tons at Ajax.
He got his first Bundesliga job because he was an excellent youth coach. Also he had to work with a lot of young players in Hoffenheim and Leipzig (because that's their business model) and was quite successful.How good is Nagelsmann at developing players? I like him as a candidate, but his problem will be that he has to develop Garnacho to next level, get the best out of Bruno and Rashford and also elevate either Højlund or Zirkzee to scoring a good amount of goals while also developing Amad.
Can he do most of this? What’s his experience in taking a talent and getting them to that next level?
Funny that you mention Ancelotti... the Bayern players didn't think his coaching sessions were up to the required standard and organised additional sessions themselves, ultimately they got him sacked due to those reasons.It didn't work out for Tuchel at Bayern, but it's a bit of a myth that they are this perfectly-run club. They've been a mess for a while, with Flick's short run of brilliance being an outlier. I have reservations about Tuchel falling out with players and exploding, but that happens with almost every manager other than Ancelotti.
My choice too. Its whether he'd consider leaving the German NT which is a pretty cushy gig for him. Though mind you I think he's too young to be a international football manager, I've always considered that to be the retirement circuit for veteran managers. So perhaps we could convince him with the setup and long term project to get back into club management.Nagelsmann all day
In his case it seems to be a kind of "parental leave" from "real managing" instead of the usual semi-retirementThough mind you I think he's too young to be a international football manager, I've always considered that to be the retirement circuit for veteran managers.
I’d love to see it. Can you imagine the whining from some of our players when they figured out how much more they’d have to run though?People will scoff at the thought but I think Bielsa wouldn't be the worst choice in the world.
You bad bad manKlopp up for a challenge next season?
Oh it would be deliciousYou bad bad man
Oh it would be delicious
I think that he might be open to the challenge too with a bit of schmoozing from Ashworth.The scouse angst over the mere suggestion of it would be something to behold
I think ETH can still do it but he has to make some bold choices.
I try the below team to see how they do, if they cant cut it we can bring in rashford/Bruno/Mainoo into first team anyway.
--------------------------Hoijlund ---------------------------------
---Garancho----------Mason---------------Amad-------------
------------Casemiro--------Ugarte---------------------------------
-----Shaw-------Lisandro-----Deligt------------Maz-------------
I think that he might be open to the challenge too with a bit of schmoozing from Ashworth.
Seeing Liverpool fans try to burn their tattoos off would be
He's been here 3 years. I've not seen anything to suggest he'll turn it around. Happy to be proven wrong, but I'm not convinced he'll drop both Bruno and Rashford. He won't go that bold.
ETH is on borrowed time. He's gone even if we scrape 4th. Keyword being scrape. Maybe a sustained, consistent position in the top 4 would convince his bosses to hold on to him, but I don't see it happening.
He's not been here 3 years, (it's 2 years 2 months) but I don't disagree with your points.
Yes and no... the problem is, that most of us who want EtH out already agreed last season that his tactical approach and formation would not work and has to be changed. He didn't change that. So it's quite urgent to sack him NOW before he ruins the new signings as well with his not working ideas. Don't integrate them into his approach, leave them untarnished for a better approach.Changing manager after 3 matches would be a knee-jerk reaction.
There is a new structure in place that needs time to fully establish itself and there are new players that need to be integrated.
I know that watching the football played before us is déjà voodoo and it's painful but a fire has been lit under EtH's arse and the players are also feeling the heat. The scene has been set and it's up to the players and coaches to respond
It would be a long way from knee jerk. The pitchforks were out after we got absolutely manhandled by Palace, on top of having one the worst seasons the club has had for the last century.Changing manager after 3 matches would be a knee-jerk reaction.
Yes and no... the problem is, that most of us who want EtH out already agreed last season that his tactical approach and formation would not work and has to be changed. He didn't change that. So it's quite urgent to sack him NOW before he ruins the new signings as well with his not working ideas. Don't integrate them into his approach, leave them untarnished for a better approach.
I get your view, and in general I would be willing to share it. But the problem is that I don't feel EtH did draw that line. If we would see that they tried to fix their approach and we now would see a lack of automatisms in a new system or similar issues, I would draw that line and grant him a fresh start. But I don't see that change, so I see it as a continuation of the issues.I guess, in my mind, I drew a line after last season and EtH's retention - so I'm viewing this season as a new period and that 3 weeks is too short a time.
Changing manager after 3 matches would be a knee-jerk reaction.