DWelbz19
Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2012
- Messages
- 35,987
Wonder how this bodes for Sterling: competition for any spot behind the striker incldues De Bruyne, Silva, Nolito, Sane, Nasri... (and Navas too, I guess)
Yeah, he's obviously very talented but he's got a hint of Januzaj about him. great potential but not there yet and no guarantee that he'll get there.We are all getting jittery here about Pogba but this deal has been dragging on for even longer. Why haven't City signed him yet? Personally, I don't think he is that good. He seems to have speed and strength but his dribbling ability is not even close to the likes of Mahrez.
Well, Guardiola had 3 years to watch him in the Bundesliga, and Sane has been counted among the most promising talents in german football for more or less exactly this stretch of time.An unknown 12 months ago now going for half what we're signing Pogba for? Suddenly our fee doesn't sound that crazy does it?
In fairness last season was his breakthroughWell, Guardiola had 3 years to watch him in the Bundesliga, and Sane has been counted among the most promising talents in german football for more or less exactly this stretch of time.
Because in 5 years Mahrez will be looking to retire and Sane will be 25 heading into the peak years of his career. It's easy to forget Mahrez has been at Leicester for a few years now and wouldn't have been touted for any club inside the top 10 before last season either.I just don't understand why someone would sign him instead of signing Mahrez.
In 5 years Mahrez will be 30 years old, far from looking to retire age. Sane is a gamble, its not even certain that at the age of 25 he'll be as good as current Mahrez. Why take the gamble when you can get a player that's already at that level, at what's probably a similar price?Because in 5 years Mahrez will be looking to retire and Sane will be 25 heading into the peak years of his career. It's easy to forget Mahrez has been at Leicester for a few years now and wouldn't have been touted for any club inside the top 10 before last season either.
In 5 years Mahrez will be 30 years old, far from looking to retire age. Sane is a gamble, its not even certain that at the age of 25 he'll be as good as current Mahrez. Why take the gamble when you can get a player that's already at that level, at what's probably a similar price?
Well, the season happened. In 06/07 Ronaldo hadn't had a season like that before, yet you'd a fool for suggesting he was a gamble. What Mahrez was doing before last season is inconsequential, why? Cause last season happened.
The thing is there is a release clause (?) in his contract next summer meaning Shalke would lose him for cheaper even though he turned 10x better this time next year. Schalke may not have a say in his destination too next year: Sane can hypothetically even go to Dortmund or Bayern and Schakle can't do nothing about. Therefore Schakle is more tempted to sell him this summer if they can get the right offer.I feel this move comes too soon, he should've stayed another season at Schalke.
He's still in that ballpark, he certainly wouldn't be at the top level for very long afterwards. You could sign Sane and he might not quite develop into a world beater and you'd still sell him for £30m because of his age. Much like Sterling hasn't become a £15m player overnight. Pep has also seen him first hand in Getmany, these coaches are the best because of their eye for talent are they not?In 5 years Mahrez will be 30 years old, far from looking to retire age. Sane is a gamble, its not even certain that at the age of 25 he'll be as good as current Mahrez. Why take the gamble when you can get a player that's already at that level, at what's probably a similar price?
Well, the season happened. In 06/07 Ronaldo hadn't had a season like that before, yet you'd a fool for suggesting he was a gamble. What Mahrez was doing before last season is inconsequential, why? Cause last season happened.
Sterling is heading in that direction in a hurry. That's the problem with signing potential, look what's happened to him? 50mil quid down the drain cause there was hope of what he could become rather than what he is.He's still in that ballpark, he certainly wouldn't be at the top level for very long afterwards. You could sign Sane and he might not quite develop into a world beater and you'd still sell him for £30m because of his age. Much like Sterling hasn't become a £15m player overnight. Pep has also seen him first hand in Getmany, these coaches are the best because of their eye for talent are they not?
You've also just effectively put an end to the term one season wonder. No longer can a player be judged based on the consistency of his football, but instead he's only as good as his last game. Lots of people on here wanted to see Kane perform for another season when you were being linked with him, same logic applied really. I'm not saying Sane is better than Mahrez by the way, but it's obvious that their are factors that could sway you either way when investing £40m.
You expecting to keep Sane for longer than 7/8 years when Mahrez approaches retirement?Because in 5 years Mahrez will be looking to retire and Sane will be 25 heading into the peak years of his career. It's easy to forget Mahrez has been at Leicester for a few years now and wouldn't have been touted for any club inside the top 10 before last season either.
I feel this move comes too soon, he should've stayed another season at Schalke.
No, but then you move into resale value. It's easy to say that's ages away and 'City spend loads', but we have to get smarter in the market eventually. We've clearly targeted youth this summer - Moreno, Jesus, Stones, Sane and Laporte all heavily linked at various stages. I'm finding it quite refreshing.You expecting to keep Sane for longer than 7/8 years when Mahrez approaches retirement?
Who stays at a club that long these days?
Ribery has been at bayern for a decade. Robben for 7 years.You expecting to keep Sane for longer than 7/8 years when Mahrez approaches retirement?
Who stays at a club that long these days?
You don't even need to look at different clubs. Just look at City. Aguero goes into his 6th season, Silva and Yaya into their 7th, Kompany into his 9th. If you're a key player for a top team, there's a pretty good chance that you stay for 1 or 2 contract extensions, which usually means that you'll be at the club for 6-7 years at least.Ribery has been at bayern for a decade. Robben for 7 years.
Drogba spent 8 years at Chelsea. Alves 8 years at barca.
Hamsik has stayed with Napoli for a decade.
and people complain about United dragging/dithering too much on deals. Literally every English club has that problem. City with Stones/Sane. United with Pogba. Only Bayern are incredible in their efforts to get the deals done quickly.
Either that or Bayern don't allow info to continually leak to the press during the negotiation stages, making it look like they tie up deals quickly.
I said longer than 7/8 years though. As it would need to be if he wants longevity past a 25 year old Mahrez.Ribery has been at bayern for a decade. Robben for 7 years.
develop into that player before ( if) he even reaches that level.
Can we all take a moment to appreciate SkySports unrivalled reporting please? Six days ago Schalke's director publicly confirmed that Sane had told the club he wanted to leave. Yet somehow Sky must have missed this news, for today they published an article that states "Manchester City target Leroy Sane has informed Schalke he wants to leave the club this summer, according to Sky sources in Germany."
i don't get where this sane hype even come from?
i mean he played over 40 matches for schalke last season and only got 9 goals and 7 assists in all competitions.
not that he is bad but he doesn't seem to be a world beater either.
i don't get where this sane hype even come from?
i mean he played over 40 matches for schalke last season and only got 9 goals and 7 assists in all competitions.
not that he is bad but he doesn't seem to be a world beater either.
I said longer than 7/8 years though. As it would need to be if he wants longevity past a 25 year old Mahrez.
So what are we looking at? 10/12? An entire career?
Not even the most optimistic club could plan like that.
i don't get where this sane hype even come from?
i mean he played over 40 matches for schalke last season and only got 9 goals and 7 assists in all competitions.
not that he is bad but he doesn't seem to be a world beater either.