NK86
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 10,652
It was more in reference to you buying a CB every season (high profile one at that) and yet being crap at the back.We need a LB, a CB and a RB to properly sort it out.
It was more in reference to you buying a CB every season (high profile one at that) and yet being crap at the back.We need a LB, a CB and a RB to properly sort it out.
You misread, I said 7 full matches, all his other appearances were from the bench or he was taken off. Had a quick google & I am indeed correct, he'd only completed 7 full matches in his professional career before his move, he wasn't exactly the most experienced of players is what I'm getting at although the stat is a little hand picked.
Guess it's just a wait & see whether he'll have an impact or not, I see similarities between the two transfers, similar age, both tall (for wingers) skillful good dribblers who cut in from the wing. He'd struggle to contribute less in terms of goals/assists compared to Navas at least, so has to be an upgrade in terms of output even at this stage in his career in my eyes.
Yeah surprised he went for that price reallyI was hoping they would get fleeced for him. £30m is a fair price for someone so highly rated in todays market.
What happened between 83 and 119?
City really could have done with Krychowiak.
It was more in reference to you buying a CB every season (high profile one at that) and yet being crap at the back.
Everyone could do with Krychowiak, he's one of, if not the, best CDMs around.
Good signing, good price. Not much use for this season but should be a signing for whatever managers follows pep in a few years. Few selection headaches now, you'd think the likes of de bruyne is gonna struggle to get into a pep side
He's the second name on the team sheet only to Aguero - can't quite understand that comment really.
Bit dramatic isn't it.