I could say it. Wouldn’t make it true.Yes you could.
I'm not sure it's as calculated as you think it is. The same reporter who broke the news of the second bid also tweeted this:Good thing I haven't said that then. All I'm saying is that when we have a clear valuation of the player and you're making these bids, it's only with one intention. To unsettle the player.
Two fax
Two fax
Two fax, two fax, two fax
Well yeah both clubs here are doing what they can to get the best out of it. Everton are absolutely entitled to hold out for the fee they see as reasonable. Similarly Utd will do what they can to lower the fee, including as you say, trying to unsettle the player. Something all clubs do when trying to get a player from a club perceived as being smaller to them.Good thing I haven't said that then. All I'm saying is that when we have a clear valuation of the player and you're making these bids, it's only with one intention. To unsettle the player.
That's how it reads and what he was trying to say as others have reported similar. Not sure where the confusion comes frommust mean we want both of them.
First off who the feck is this source and we said this after the first bid too. We all know we'll agree a deal very close to their asking price and then brief why it was a blinder of a deal.
Can’t see Everton getting that from any PL club with PSR rules being what they are. It’s a question of whether Everton actually want to cash in and balance their books or if they’re going to hold tight on the valuation knowing it’s unlikely to be met.
We all know we'll agree a deal very close to their asking price and then brief why it was a blinder of a deal.
Copy paste bid for Konsa.
I'm beginning to get Mason Mount vibes from this saga. Thankfully John Murtough isn't spearheading the transfer, so hopefully we won't be in a situation in a few weeks time where Everton 'reluctantly' accept 65m+5m adds ons and we brief the press about how we drove a hard bargain and didn't give into Everton's high asking price.
Perfect opportunity to show we won’t just ultimately pay up. Much better to stop & say no thanks.
He’s not a 60-70m defender so if Everton rate at that, better they keep him.
Unlike with Højlund, we’re rather stacked there so we shouldn’t feel desperate.
Did we not sack the "£x + 5" guy in the reshuffle?
I think we go again with £55m+5 - Everton come back and ask for £60m+10 - and we negotiate it to £58m+7 or something like that (similar to the Mount situation).
I'm fairly convinced anything above £60m total would be a bad deal, but it's clear someone at the club likes him.
This isn't getting done for less than £60 million when Killman just went for £40.
I reckon there will be one final bid of £55+5 which is the most we would probably be willing to pay and that should just be about enough to seal it.
and why would Villa accept 45m+5m for Konsa?Copy paste bid for Konsa.
I just don't see anything special with Brainthwaite, certainly nowhere near the prices being quoted. From what I've seen of him (albeit not a great deal), he doesn't look good enough. What am I missing?
This will be some good insight to how INEOS will deal with things. Two rejections, INEOS are shopping in the 40-50 mill range this window, based on other deals currently being done. Do they walk away to actually make the point that we will no longer get strung along and try to stop the "english tax" killing us, or are they desperate for an english signing and we are going to get Maguire'd again.