Meeeeeh so what.All this is, is you trying to unsettle him into pushing a move and trying to dick swing.
Meeeeeh so what.All this is, is you trying to unsettle him into pushing a move and trying to dick swing.
Would you be this bothered if city was doing this? Honestly?
When did I say that? Chelsea did the exact same to us with Stones. We held our nerve and sold him to City for a better price.
Im genuinely going to use this line from now on.Take it you sluts
I missed the brief, I guess.Yes because we briefed that we would walk away a week or so ago and back we go with an offer that's £10m more than the last one.
You can value him at £200m, doesn't mean clubs can't make offers.Yes? Id be bothered if any club was putting in bids way below the valuation we have clearly set for months.
They wanted £70m, we've got upto £50m with just our second offer, we're doing a pretty shoddy job of not giving into what they want.I missed the brief, I guess.
I don't think this is remotely close to giving in to what Everton want. But some will moan at anything.
You can value him at £200m, doesn't mean clubs can't make offers.
Just two clubs trying to get the best deals for themselves. You want bigger fee for yourself, we are trying to get him for a reasonable fee. I don't see anything wrong. It all comes down to what the player wants at this stage.All this is, is you trying to unsettle him into pushing a move and trying to dick swing.
In most transfers selling clubs always overvalue the players initially and then settle for a lower offer. Why are your club being so precious about it?Good thing I haven't said that then. All I'm saying is that when we have a clear valuation of the player and you're making these bids, it's only with one intention. To unsettle the player.
Yes? Id be bothered if any club was putting in bids way below the valuation we have clearly set for months.
Just two clubs trying to get the best deals for themselves. You want bigger fee for yourself, we are trying to get him for a reasonable fee. I don't see anything wrong. It all comes down to what the player wants at this stage.
And it's not we are doing a Real Madrid trying to sign him on a free. Now that's the real dick swing.
So you know we are still 20m off what they want and still think we are giving in. Honestly..They wanted £70m, we've got upto £50m with just our second offer, we're doing a pretty shoddy job of not giving into what they want.
He should kick up a fuss. Your overvaluing him and blocking a transfer. You've set a price that one club in world football can meet and everyone agrees would be completely stupid to do so.Good thing I haven't said that then. All I'm saying is that when we have a clear valuation of the player and you're making these bids, it's only with one intention. To unsettle the player.
In most transfers selling clubs always overvalue the players initially and then settle for a lower offer. Why are your club being so precious about it?
He should kick up a fuss. Your overvaluing him and blocking a transfer. You've set a price that one club in world football can meet and everyone agrees would be completely stupid to do so.
As I said, it comes down to what the player wants. If as reported at the start of this saga that he's happy to stay at Everton then you have no need to be concerned as we agreed personal terms with him ages ago and he hasnt agitated yet.I don't think it is really. We have set a clear valuation for him that we have made absolutely no signs of budging on for a month or so now. Think it's purely tactics to unsettle him.
That’s crazy no other club has thought of this. My God !Comments like these are why other fans dislike fans of 'bigger' clubs. Expecting clubs and players to just lie down and succumb to your demands.
The value is his value to US. Not his value to you, or his value to how highly people rate him. There is no precious nature to it, Brighton realised that if a club wants a player it will be on their terms and it seems like we feel the same.
Depends how highly he's rated within the club. I think £50m is about right given age, current level of play and what he could potentially be.That’s already overpaying.
As I said, it comes down to what the player wants. If as reported at the start of this saga that he's happy to stay at Everton then you have no need to be concerned as we agreed personal terms with him ages ago and he hasnt agitated yet.
Value is a subjective term and you dont have a monopoly on deciding what it is.Comments like these are why other fans dislike fans of 'bigger' clubs. Expecting clubs and players to just lie down and succumb to your demands.
The value is his value to US. Not his value to you, or his value to how highly people rate him. There is no precious nature to it, Brighton realised that if a club wants a player it will be on their terms and it seems like we feel the same.
Value is a subjective term and you dont have a monopoly on deciding what it is.
Damn, we're not messing around this window!
That’s already overpaying.
Still comes down to the club. We rejected Stones' transfer request and Chelsea bids and held our resolve, only for him to come back, continue to play and then sign for City for the money we wanted later on.
Oh bore off.35m is the most I'll pay for him, that new proposal has desperation written all over it.
Ofcourse. You are well within your rights to keep rejecting bids until you're asking price has been met. And the player has been reported to be happy to stay at Everton. You hold all the power.Still comes down to the club. We rejected Stones' transfer request and Chelsea bids and held our resolve, only for him to come back, continue to play and then sign for City for the money we wanted later on.
I get your overall point but we can still offer what we think is fair, you can entertain negotiations or tell us to piss off.Yes, we do, because we are *selling* him.