Apparently, Arsenal supporters don't even watch Arsenal any longer! First, it's the empty seats in the stadium and then it's empty chairs in front of televisions.
Most opponents in the league know that when they come up against Arsenal that they're, well, outgunned and sit back and let them have their possession. Or at least that there's nothing they can do about Arsenal's possession. Anyone who denies this might as well argue that LVG had United playing an exciting brand of counterattacking football.
Putting a different way, Arsenal under Wenger are famous for their possession tactics. But forget what I have to say.
http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...e-Wenger-Tactics-Transfer-News-Gossip-Rumours
Key takeway from this concise, yet solid assessment:
Vardy's chart is a picture of flowing efficiency. Fourty-four per cent of the assists for his goals were played from less than 10 yards inside the opposing half or even further back. Arsenal scored precisely two goals in that manner in the entire 38-game season.
Another piece:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...Arsene-Wenger-s-style-29-year-old-fit-in.html
Last season Arsenal played 4-2-3-1 in all 38 fixtures in the Premier League. Leicester, meanwhile, played 4-4-2 in all but four, and the similarities are few and far between.
One worry, though, would be whether this (Vardy up front in a 4231) works for Vardy. The striker is used to feeding off long balls but that's not the Arsenal way.
http://www.realsport101.com/does-vardy-really-fit-in-arsenals-style/
The two teams play as different a style as it is possible to imagine and still be playing the same game.
https://paininthearsenal.com/2016/06/04/arsenal-jamie-vardy-bid-not-all-that-spectacular/
Better yet, can [Vardy] play the way Arsenal play?
Vardy made a killing playing the counterattacking style that Leicester City popularized at the start of the season. They were scoring two to three goals a game with a fast-paced counter strike powered by Vardy and Mahrez. But when it came to slowing play down and controlling possession, Vardy lost his effectiveness.
That is how Arsenal play. Arsenal controls possession. No one had more possession last season than Arsenal. That’s not what Vardy is all about. He is going to be like a more effective Walcott. It provides an interesting alternative, but Arsenal are at their best when they have a Giroud-type up front that holds up play and springs his team mates on.
I won't go into each of the possibilities discussed in the Daily Mail piece but I'm sure we can trust that Wenger has a pretty good idea of how he'd use Vardy. But it's very clearly the case what where Vardy has excelled for Leicester City is leading the counterattack. Arsenal won't pass up the opportunity to counterattack if one presents itself, but counterattacking football simply isn't in Wenger's DNA.
Reasonable minds may differ on whether Vardy can adapt to Arsenal football -- or, I suppose, whether Wenger may adapt his tactics to suit Vardy (doubt it) -- but one would be oblivious to reality to suggest that Arsenal's tactics last season (and the 10 or so previous seasons) is similar to that of Leicester City or that they rarely enjoy more possession of the ball than their opponents.
I definitely encourage you to watch Arsenal next season.
I'm not suggesting Vardy would necessarily be a bad signing for Arsenal. They obviously could use a striker. But Vardy will either have to adapt to Arsenal or Arsenal will have to adapt to him. If it's neither it's not going to work.