Selbourne
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2011
- Messages
- 992
I wanted him to at least be given an actual chance considering he's impressed out on loan and we have our midfield shortcomings
They're not the same player and McTomminay won't fetch anywhere near £30m
According to Luckhurst it's £8m potentially rising to £15m with a sell on clause, no mention of a buy back clause.
According to Luckhurst it's £8m potentially rising to £15m with a sell on clause, no mention of a buy back clause.
I wouldn't be surprised if the buy back clause is just there to appease fans.
It seems they're letting (fear of) fans dictate their actions a lot more these days and they have their finger on the pulse ever since the super league fiasco.
Amazingly poor if true. 15+ addons sounds more like a fair valuation to me.According to Luckhurst it's £8m potentially rising to £15m with a sell on clause, no mention of a buy back clause.
We sold Dylan Levitt for between £300-500k as well.Pereria £10m
Bailly - loan (loan fee) with buy obligation £5m
Chong - Birmingham (not finalised yet, negotiations ongoing for sale)
Garner - £15m
That would be it for transfers, we also have Henderson, Pellistri and Amad out on loan or going, which we received a fee for.
True but if Liverpool were selling him he would be.
I think if the interest from Newcastle was genuine we could have got more than £20m for McT
But we didn't because we're obsessed about home grown academy players even when they're proven failures. I'd rather sell a player who hasn't made the grade for £15m than one who has barely even had a sub appearance.
Why do we believe Luckhurst over Romano then?
Whenever we want at the pre-agreed price.How buy-back clause exactly works, we can buy him back only if they decide to sell or we can repurchase whenever we want?
Too conspiratorial? Arnautovic saga.What?
There's usually a deadline in there, is there not?Whenever we want at the pre-agreed price.
Disgusting. We have one other CDM in casemiro who is 30. Insane
In some cases. In others, I think the clause remains in place until the player signs for another club.Too conspiratorial? Arnautovic saga.
There's usually a deadline in there, is there not?
We can sell McTomminay whenever, he’s proven he can play in the PL, maybe not at this level but he can do it. He’s only in our team because he’s over 6ft and is willing to scrap, people don’t like it but we’re soft in the middle and short on corners without him. He’ll get less game time now Casemiro is here anyway but he can still play a part.True but if Liverpool were selling him he would be.
I think if the interest from Newcastle was genuine we could have got more than £20m for McT
But we didn't because we're obsessed about home grown academy players even when they're proven failures. I'd rather sell a player who hasn't made the grade for £15m than one who has barely even had a sub appearance.
£8M according to the Everton forum, could be £15M.
That's simply not a good deal for us.
That's simply not a good deal for us.
Depends what the sell on clause is. He's decent, but people are kidding themselves if they thought we were getting 25m considering the options on the market.
Depends what the sell on clause is. He's decent, but people are kidding themselves if they thought we were getting 25m considering the options on the market.
I understand he’s been more of a box to box but surely he has played there - hasn’t he?Garner is not a CDM, although it's a shame not to have seen him have a run out after the last couple of seasons at Forest.
That said, this wouldn't be happening without ETH's blessing so happy to back it especially if there's a reasonable buy-back option included.