ThanksBoss26
Full Member
Usual drill. Never going to say I can’t wait to see the back of the guy.
Anyone thinking we'd get £50M for Sancho was delusional.I would be happy if Sancho leaves the club, but to be honest letting him leave for 25M would be a bad idea.
At the begining of the summer we were talking about 50M, and now 25M.
They have sold us Mount for a fortune, so we should take them almost 50M
Mount wasn’t on £350k in wages. And no one was talking about buying Sancho for £50m earlier in the summer.I would be happy if Sancho leaves the club, but to be honest letting him leave for 25M would be a bad idea.
At the begining of the summer we were talking about 50M, and now 25M.
They have sold us Mount for a fortune, so we should take them almost 50M
There is a lot of delusion on this forum to be fair.Anyone thinking we'd get £50M for Sancho was delusional.
That’s an understatement.There is a lot of delusion on this forum to be fair.
Be my guest and run it as much as you want as soon as the window closes.Harsh!
^This^£25M+Carney Chukwuemeka and we're shaking hands
PSG where keen on him in a swap with Ugarte right.Mount wasn’t on £350k in wages. And no one was talking about buying Sancho for £50m earlier in the summer.
Says who?PSG where keen on him in a swap with Ugarte right.
I read somewhere on Twitter earlier that Ashworth was keen on signing him for Newcastle from Villa. Who knows…£25M+Carney Chukwuemeka and we're shaking hands
A straight swap would be good enough as we get rid of Sancho's wages and Chukuwuku would obviously on less.£25M+Carney Chukwuemeka and we're shaking hands
It'd be even better if we manage to let go of Eriksen.A straight swap would be good enough as we get rid of Sancho's wages and Chukuwuku would obviously on less.
Hopefully, the talk of a loan to Betis is real.It'd be even better if we manage to let go of Eriksen.
A loan doesn't really benefit Utd at all surely?
Not having him in our squad is the benefitA loan doesn't really benefit Utd at all surely?
Ideally not. But if it’s the only thing on the table, we’ll have a decision to make soon. Loan fee, wage contribution may come into it.A loan doesn't really benefit Utd at all surely?
It's initial loan...so there should be an option or an obligation. Even if it just a 'dry loan' it benefits us if we can get rid of his wages and you give us a nice little loan fee on top.A loan doesn't really benefit Utd at all surely?
A loan doesn't really benefit Utd at all surely?
He probably wouldn't be able to play against United so that's good as I'm sure he'd score.A loan doesn't really benefit Utd at all surely?
The shop window was with dortmund last season, and here we are on deadline day still trying to get rid.Puts him in the shop window, gives us another year of amortisation of his transfer fee which means we won't take as big an FFP whack when we sell him next season, and saves us a good whack in wages if they're fully covered.
Better than a spit in the face, but I still think we'll turn it down unless you commit to buy him.
The shop window was with dortmund last season, and here we are on deadline day still trying to get rid.
This loan needs to have an obligation to buy, so there's a clean break with Sancho and he won't be our problem anymore.
Puts him in the shop window, gives us another year of amortisation of his transfer fee which means we won't take as big an FFP whack when we sell him next season, and saves us a good whack in wages if they're fully covered.
Better than a spit in the face, but I still think we'll turn it down unless you commit to buy him.
We need a winger other than Sancho. Please get one over the line, even Sterling would do. Cannot stand Rashford being a nailed on starter.
Chelsea have 90 players. Why would they play him?
Chelsea have 90 players. Why would they play him?
Uhhh, Chelsea is our direct competition for top 4? Why would we not care if he does well for them again?Even if he does well who really cares?