LawCharltonBest
Enjoys watching porn..with foxes
He is absolutely 100% guaranteed to score against United. You all know it
True, but with or without Sancho we need another attacking optionAt best we're probably losing around 5 goals with Sancho going. Doesn't really make a world of difference.
Can we not throw Mount in also?Come on Chelsea, give us our Mount money back!
True, but with or without Sancho we need another attacking option
You love to see itHe’ll play well for a bit, oppo fans will laugh at us, Dortmund will Tweet us, and then he’ll be shit and disappear for the remainder of his contract.
On Fifa.He is absolutely 100% guaranteed to score against United. You all know it
I think the more competition the better, from Sancho's pov.Going by his work ethic here, joining a team with so much competition seems like a recipe for disaster. He either wants to be guaranteed a starting spot, or he sulks.
Yep, definitely this. They won't be able to keep proper tabs on him with 45 players around the gaff so he'll do whatever he wants and get away with it.I think the more competition the better, from Sancho's pov.
I think he's more than happy to sit on his arse.
I thought they were in for Osimhen?Toney looks like he is off to Saudi.
£40m deal agreed
Dortmund will Tweet us,
It doesn't make much sense but perhaps stylistically Maresca prefers Sancho's profile to Sterling. They play the same positions but they are two very different types of winger.What I don't get is why they definitely won't be playing Sterling, but they will be playing Sancho.
What I don't get is why they definitely won't be playing Sterling, but they will be playing Sancho.
We'd be so luck! (actually, I like Mount - just been a shambolic transfer i.t.o. injuries and where our needs to strengthen actually were).Can we not throw Mount in also?
He needs better creative wingers in the "half spaces". Neto, Mudryk, Sterling are all similar in style, so I think Neto and Mudryk will be the direct wing options, then maybe Sancho offers them something a bit different. Only way I can reason it.It doesn't make much sense but perhaps stylistically Maresca prefers Sancho's profile to Sterling. They play the same positions but they are two very different types of winger.
It doesn't make much sense but perhaps stylistically Maresca prefers Sancho's profile to Sterling. They play the same positions but they are two very different types of winger.
Yeah they just want his book value.
I heard on the Athletic that if we got £30m for him it would be considered profit on the books due to the amortisation on his fee, so this is mostly his break even fee + we lose his wages. Massive win for our PSR compliance.25M pounds isn't great money really but given his huge wages it's understandable.
Ideally we sell Sancho today and get another attacker but that's unlikely. Our options on both wings aren't great, either not good enough (Antony and current Rashford) or still developing (Garnacho, Amad).
It’s £40m+ including wages off the books.25M pounds isn't great money really but given his huge wages it's understandable.
My bad that was €84mil (£72mil).Sancho never cost 84 mill ffs
They won't realise he didn't come to training with 45 players around the place. He'll get away with murder for months before they realise.You just know that this time next summer it will be Sancho banished from their squad to train with the reserves while they try and force him out.
Source?It’s £40m+ including wages off the books.
Source for what? His wages?Source?
It was supposed to say 8 year contract on £250k a week.Chelsea project