ThanksBoss26
Full Member
That would do for now. Let’s hope it’s decent conditions which become a permanent deal.
They said the deals were separate to be fair...Fair play if Ashworth even hoodwinked the likes of Ornstein into thinking we wanted Sterling whilst in background sealing loan with Juve
In any conversation for the worst in the clubs history I expect.What a fail of a transfer this has been. Who would have guessed after the outcry of missing out on him a season prior to him joining
I believe so yeah.Does it count towards PSR if its an obligation? Can we use the future income to sign a striker?
Antony cost more, has done less and has little to no resale value.In any conversation for the worst in the clubs history I expect.
It’s an obligation to buy, they have to make it permanent.That would do for now. Let’s hope it’s decent conditions which become a permanent deal.
I think Antony’s is worse. But Sancho is definitely in the conversation.In any conversation for the worst in the clubs history I expect.
Isn't / wasn't Sancho on nearly twice the wage packet?Antony cost more, has done less and has little to no resale value.
Get the feck in!!
Now get in another attacker that isn't Raheem Sterling, please.
Toney pleaseDoes it count towards PSR if its an obligation? Can we use the future income to sign a striker now?
Antony's reportedly on around 200k per week, which I would believe given how high our wage bill is even when we're not paying out any bonuses for winning trophies.Isn't / wasn't Sancho on nearly twice the wage packet?
I disagree, I don't rate Antony much, but I can think of a few good games of his compared to Sancho, I can't think of a single standout performance from him.Antony cost more, has done less and has little to no resale value.
Whats weird is that Antony and Sancho have both played 83 games for us, Sancho has 12 goals and Antony 11.I disagree, I don't rate Antony much, but I can think of a few good games of his compared to Sancho, I can't think of a single standout performance from him.
Not always. Obligation can often be contingent on certain conditions being met e.g a set number of appearances or Champions League qualification. Eric Bailly went to Marseille on loan with an obligation which didn’t happen as he didn’t hit the criteria.It’s an obligation to buy, they have to make it permanent.
Why has a loan w/obligation to buy been so alien to people this window?
Toney please
Not sure about PSR specifically, but in FFP a loan with obligation counts as a sale. So its a fair bet its the same principle.Does it count towards PSR if its an obligation? Can we use the future income to sign a striker now?
That would be fine too.Thank feck it’s not a Sterling swap deal
Hopefully we can get a few more out of the door too, I'm praying that the saudis come in for Case if Ugarte is going to be first choice. If not, we could still do with Lindelof and Eriksen sold and a couple more loaned out.Admiral optimism but quiet two days now for us that consist of confirming this loan and unveiling Ugarte
Still think it's a mistake to let him go. If Garnacho gets hurt all we have is a broken Rashford... Unless there is some academy player I don't know about we will be struggling for goals if Garnacho ever goes down.
On the plus side, we didn't spend even more on himWhat a fail of a transfer this has been. Who would have guessed after the outcry of missing out on him a season prior to him joining
Reading the club statement it seemed more like an option to buy.Not always. Obligation can often be contingent on certain conditions being met e.g a set number of appearances or Champions League qualification. Eric Bailly went to Marseille on loan with an obligation which didn’t happen as he didn’t hit the criteria.
Manchester United defender Eric Bailly has joined French side Marseille on loan for the remainder of the 2022/23 season.
Bailly’s move to the south of France includes the possibility of a permanent transfer at the end of the season.
There have been counter reports that say he's only on 75k and the rest of the 200k that gets reported is made up of performance related bonuses. The idea being that the media always reports the maximum potential wage for United because it winds us up.Antony's reportedly on around 200k per week, which I would believe given how high our wage bill is even when we're not paying out any bonuses for winning trophies.
It was an obligation based on appearances + them qualifying for CLReading the club statement it seemed more like an option to buy.