suheilsworld
Full Member
The 1st and the last time Sancho comes good for the club…. Get it done
He was never part of anyones transfer plans because he offers no value at £30m+. Let alone the £40-50m insane price we've been asking for.
He's never going to produce on the pitch and he's never going to sell for any decent fee, so the best case was always avoid paying any more wages with another loan, or try to sell him at his book value (£29m this summer). But we still dont have the basic sense to try for either, and instead priced him out same as McTominay.
Is this his 4th season?
Yeah, start of his 4th season. Amazing that so much time passed with so little (nothing) to show for.
He has 5+1 contract.
He's literally done nothing.
He's literally done nothing.
I'm actually amazed, feels like he's only been here for like a season. Just about sums up his impact at United.Yeah, start of his 4th season. Amazing that so much time passed with so little (nothing) to show for.
He has 5+1 contract.
Problen we would have to probably pay 75% of his wages. Not many clubs can afford £350,000 a week. Even if we got a club to pay £150,000 of that, we are still left with £200,000 to pay.Getting rid of him should be our number 1 priority before the window closes.
Problen we would have to probably pay 75% of his wages. Not many clubs can afford £350,000 a week. Even if we got a club to pay £150,000 of that, we are still left with £200,000 to pay.
This is why I think PSG were the last hope to sell him this summer. It will now have to be a loan with Utd subsidizing his wages yet again.
The original deal we gave him was mental. Just like the fee we paid for Antony. How this stuff got signed off and approved is beyond me.
Problen we would have to probably pay 75% of his wages. Not many clubs can afford £350,000 a week. Even if we got a club to pay £150,000 of that, we are still left with £200,000 to pay.
This is why I think PSG were the last hope to sell him this summer. It will now have to be a loan with Utd subsidizing his wages yet again.
The original deal we gave him was mental. Just like the fee we paid for Antony. How this stuff got signed off and approved is beyond me.
I think Mount will come good and ,tbf, at least he works on and off the ball.Would love to get rid of Sancho, Lindelof and McTominay.
Sancho has been a disaster. He's everything I anticipated.
Same is happening with Mount in the games I've seen him play too.
What gave you that idea?Crazy how we were champing at the bits to get him here, made him the record signing...and the best thing he can do for this club is leave to help us get a DM that many don't even want.
Huh? Who doesn’t want him ?Crazy how we were champing at the bits to get him here, made him the record signing...and the best thing he can do for this club is leave to help us get a DM that many don't even want.
He played some football... on his ps5. Probably didn't even play as Man UtdHe's literally done nothing.
He played some football... on his ps5. Probably didn't even play as Man Utd
Huh? Who doesn’t want him ?
He is waiting for FC25.Has he gone yet?
He is waiting for FC25.
He isn't going anywhere, permanently anyway.
His profile picture on both Instagram and Twitter is still him in Dortmund shirtI reckon he sat there in his full Dortmund kit when waiting for his loan move to go through. Bet he's wearing it right now.
If Sancho is only worth £30m then Ugarte is worth £25m. Ugarte might be great fit for us but he has never had the highs that Sancho showed at Dortmund. Sancho plus any money would be getting fleeced.Coincidentally they've offered Sancho the exact same salary that Coman currently earns at Bayern, they're interested in signing one of them.
As long as we don't set the Sancho price too high I think they're genuinely considering signing him after his Champions League performances last season for Dortmund.
If we're pricing Sancho out the deal then they'll sign Coman or just loan him for a season I think.
I'm hoping we let Sancho go for around 30m euros/pounds and put 20m more on top for Ugarte. Everyone is happy then surely?
I don't think there's a redemption arc for Sancho here, and it's likely that the more he's on the bench the more toxic things will be come. We need to move on.
We should explore swap deals for Chiesa or Felix if we can't really sell. Both players are forced out by their clubs and would add more than Sancho.
Referring to the bolded part.. having him spend the majority of the season on the bench isn’t just toxic, it also doesn’t help his value appreciate or his form get any better and he’ll become a bigger liability to move on next summer..I don't think there's a redemption arc for Sancho here, and it's likely that the more he's on the bench the more toxic things will be come. We need to move on.
We should explore swap deals for Chiesa or Felix if we can't really sell. Both players are forced out by their clubs and would add more than Sancho.
I do think if we are unable to move him on this summer we should just keep him at the club with no prospect of playing. If we organise a subsidised loan again, or provide him with playing time here, then in January or next summer there will just be the same struggle. If it is made clear he will not play here and we won't be paying for him to play elsewhere, despite what many here think I believe 99% of players would take the loss and move on.I don't think there's a redemption arc for Sancho here, and it's likely that the more he's on the bench the more toxic things will be come. We need to move on.
We should explore swap deals for Chiesa or Felix if we can't really sell. Both players are forced out by their clubs and would add more than Sancho.
When has that stopped them. We've done them a few favours in the past, they owe us one.Strongly doubt this.
Chelsea are stacked with attacking options and will likely buy Osimhen. This sounds like gossip
For his football career Chelsea would be such a horrible fit. I don't think I'd be very concerned that he'd suddenly look a world beater again.