He said in an interview that he was happy with getting a full pre season under his belt. So in theory he should be pretty much as fit as he is going to be.Yeah, the intensity will come with fitness.
Although I agree in that Martial improves our attacks and complements others around him, it is still worrying if Sancho can only perform well if Martial is playing.I'd wait for Martial to get fit before we fully judge him this season. With Rashford and Ronaldo, our wingers have zero opportunities to play the ball into the striker's feet and play one-twos. Sancho was excellent in pre-season only in the games that Martial played. Lets see Sancho - Martial - Antony for a few games and then assess.
BrunoIs there anyone we have signed for 50M+ who has been a resouding success? Can't think of any recently.
It feels like most of the big money transfers for most clubs seem to go really bad.
interesting. Why they didn't fight for him to come back and went after Grealish for more money? maybe he had his heart set on United possibly? could of been worth a cheeky bid from PepBit misleading since City did try to keep Sancho and get him to sign a professional contract, while Foden signed a very similar contract offer around the same time and barely got any minutes in the next couple of seasons.
Anyway, apparently those £7 million (which rose considerably to £18 million with add ons and sell ons) weren't even strictly necessary because Sancho only had a scholarship contract with City which Sancho could legally terminate himself; and he did just that, hence the questionable reports of him going on strike to force a move when arguably he wasn't even under contract anymore. In the end Dortmund paid up that amount instead of the mere few hundred thousand required compensation, just to avoid delaying the transfer in case it would go to court and potentially jeopardise the move.
£7 million on its own doesn't sound like a lot, but considering that City didn't have much leverage and could have lost him for next to nothing, I'd say that's a fairly lucky outcome for them and not necessarily a sign City didn't value him.
Is there anyone we have signed for 50M+ who has been a resouding success? Can't think of any recently.
It feels like most of the big money transfers for most clubs seem to go really bad.
It’s reported him and Pep had a fall out over his departure. I don’t think sancho was keen on going back there anyway. I’m also not sure City were that keen on even wanting him.interesting. Why they didn't fight for him to come back and went after Grealish for more money? maybe he had his heart set on United possibly? could of been worth a cheeky bid from Pep
In a way, yes, I agree. But I also think it's incredibly hard for a team to function when the ball simply won't stick up front. That doesn't necessarily need to be Martial but at least a similar profile player. We only have Martial in our squad who can currently fulfil that role, though. Sancho will always struggle with his lack of aggression and his passive style though but I still think in the right setup he would look markedly better.Although I agree in that Martial improves our attacks and complements others around him, it is still worrying if Sancho can only perform well if Martial is playing.
Mbappe and to an extent Neymar can be regarded as successes.Looking around Europe there are loads of 50m+ signings that worked out well. Very few 100m+ seem to.
Ah yes, he's definitely been worth the money. But one out of 10+ (?) signings for 50M+ being a success does not bode well for us.Bruno
Yeah, City have signed loads of players for around that 50M mark, and have won a lot. But 80-100M signings have rarely seemed to work out for anyone.Looking around Europe there are loads of 50m+ signings that worked out well. Very few 100m+ seem to.
350k a week.
That’s mad.
Obscene wages at the age of 21
Where does his motivation come from to improve his game?
Whether he performs or not those wages will still land in his bank account.
Do you see anyone being interested in buying him if he continues to perform at this level for 350k?
Greenwood was extremely fast. A lot faster than SanchoGreenwood was much, much better and I don't think he was that quick. As an an attacking you need a weapon to scare the opposition - Sancho doesn't terrify you. It's not as if, that you give him too much space and he'll rocket a shot into the goal or you get too tight and you'll get burned.
You defend him by keeping at an arm's distance and you don't need to worry because he doesn't have much that can hurt you
Worth giving him a shot as a false 9 flanked by Rashford and Antony, considering our CF woes?
This is what I want.
Im not comparing him to Messi exactly - but I wonder if Sancho can be central and play through balls to inverted forwards, link up play and also dribble and centrally take on the defenders to make their life hard.
Is this true or an assumption?Bundesliga had this incredibly high line that he would beat and then simply cross back to the striker.
In the PL that high line is hardly there and is supposed to take on the fullback directly.
Utd were going to pay over 100m for him a year before that!Should have rung alarm bells at United when nobody else wanted him at the discount price of £74m.
Greenwood was officially the fastest at the club. He is a real dick head for ruining his career. A peak Greenwood would be perfect in Ten Haags set up and we wouldn’t be throwing stupid money at players who are still not established yet!Greenwood was extremely fast. A lot faster than Sancho