Well, to be fair, goals do mean something...like the difference between winning and losing for example. For some of us, this is quite significant.
25
Season Average Rating
- Appearances
- 41
- Goals
- 7
- Assists
- 3
- Yellow cards
- 0
- Status
If Tottenham drops a 50 million bid on the table for Sancho. United should absolutely take it, it would be a better deal than when Inter saved us from Lukaku.
£70m for Sancho.
We paid £73m for him in the first place and he’s been one of the worst players in the league getting regular minutes for a top half team for the last two years. £50m is already an insane overpay, £70m sounds like a bad joke.
50M for Sancho would be selling well.
We have to take £50m if it’s being offered.
Get rid of the flop
Get rid of the flop
After 2 years of absolute shite and a reported 250k a week how much do you think he’s worth?
£50m is a fair price we are never getting more than 50m and to go one further if he has another season like the last 2 we’d be lucky to get 25m
Think he has to go if £50m is on the table.
Rashford and Garnacho have the left locked down. Antony and Diallo on the right.
Gives us more funds to bolster GK, CB, CM, ST.
Rashford and Garnacho have the left locked down. Antony and Diallo on the right.
Gives us more funds to bolster GK, CB, CM, ST.
If anyone is stupid enough to offer us 50 million quid for Sancho, we should bite their hand off.
I would sell at 35-40m since we desperately need 2 strikers and 2 CMs while being well stacked at LW.
Snap their hand off ast £50 million. He isn't even a starter for us
You're insane if you think Maguire is worth "much more" than 50m. He's hardly played this year, has mostly been poor when he did, and the year before when he was a first choice CB he was horrific. Couple that with his age and wages and there's 0 chance he's worth that much at this point.
Now as far as Sancho goes, I'd probably take something like 60-70m for him. Could see him going off and rediscovering what made him great in a bit of an easier/less intense league. But at a certain point you can't afford to just keep assets until they rot any bit of value they have, so as much as I like him as a footballer it would be smart business to do a deal if offered that much especially with the emergence of Garnacho
Are you ok?
We bought him for 75m 2 years ago and hes regressed in that time.
Only the club would know what really happened during that weird spell earlier this season when he was taking a mental health break and training on his own away from the team. It could be that these events are now firmly behind him and he'll be a much better player once he's able to refocus next season.
Otherwise, given his wages, I didn't think we'd be able to get anyone to take him off our hands for free, never mind offering 50M for him.
Otherwise, given his wages, I didn't think we'd be able to get anyone to take him off our hands for free, never mind offering 50M for him.
50mil??
Sounds too good to be true.
Sounds too good to be true.
Sancho + money for Kane. I'd take it.
This discussion has a familiar tone to it.... Didn't you guys say the same thing about Rashford same time last season?
I did'nt but when Marcus was out of form it was concerning considering the form he showed when he first came into the team as a teenager.
The difference between Marcus and Sancho is their physical prowess and suitability to the English game as one is suited to it and the other is not.
Sancho must be one of the most feeble players I have seen in the Premier League and while he has very good technique it is simply not enough for him to play at a top club in England IMO.
Rashford has, in the past, shown what he is capable of in a Manchester United shirt. In addition he has more of the raw materials that can translate into being able to function in many different setups (Rapid, good movement, actually able to take on players). Sancho has shown neither of those things at Manchester United and there’s little in the way of evidence to say that he ever will.
Ten Hags best ability is the ability to improve players. He did it at ajax & united - but Sancho hasnt improved 1 bit. I'd sell him but Ten Hag used him far too much & in important games to believe that he doesnt exactly have a future here
Sancho is a player with an abundance of technical ability but just doesn’t seem to have the desire and fight in him to be a player at the top of the game! He’d fit in well at Spurs and it wouldn’t surprise me if we’re talking about Sancho like we have been Deli Alli this season! Take any money offered and run
There is a player in there. Sancho has had to suffer under 3 coaches since he has been at United, all with different philosophies. Maybe once he has some terra firma under his footballing feet, he can start to show what he had in abundance at Dortmund.
If you ask me, you are not far from the truth, but at I'd give Antony another season to convince me of that.
After 2 years here it's clear that the best we can get from Sancho is some money back from his hefty transfer fee.
Jes O folks how many time is someone going to post this player plus money nonsense . This happens about 0.0001% of transfer deals. This is definitely not happening with Levy either . He would go you don't want Sancho so he is worth nothing to us. Everyone knows how to play United to screw us out of money. So no a swap + money is the most unlikely of outcome.
But nothing about how he plays changed with those three managers. He's always looked like the exact same player.
Please read my post and show me where I said Maguire is more than 50m.
For a player who goes missing way too often at important moments, then 50m would be a great deal. Would allow for Garnacho to get more playing time also.
Still desperate to see him make it here, but I do fear he only thrives in very specific set-ups. Plus he does lack a lot in the physical and mental side of the game, where he excels in the technical and tactical part of it. But we need all four.
50 million would be a great deal, should definitely sell him for that price. Garnacho is currently better in our system and has more potential.
50 million would be a great deal, should definitely sell him for that price. Garnacho is currently better in our system and has more potential.
£50m was about what I was expecting, to be honest. It makes sense as another club might think they can get something out of him.
I think we should probably take it as I doubt he is ever going to make it here, now. We already have another question mark in Antony, so it is probably best to move on and possibly bring in someone else.
I think we should probably take it as I doubt he is ever going to make it here, now. We already have another question mark in Antony, so it is probably best to move on and possibly bring in someone else.
I think we could still sell him for 40/50 this time next year if he hasn’t kicked on. It makes more sense for us to hold on. He still has insane potential in the right setup and there will always be a few clubs that will take a punt.
Garnacho is only good of the bench at the moment.
Nobody is paying us £50m for him, especially as his wages are reportedly £300k+ pw.
We're stuck with him for now, so we just have to hope he does turn it around, or EtH finds a way to fit him into a system.
Man Utd need destroyers in attack. We currently have Rashford as the only one. Sancho plays in a tame, odourless way. I think it's linked to physicality and fitness.
He would still be coming off the bench, Rashford is first choice.
We need to learn to get rid of players not hitting the levels we need. City do it (Sterling, Sane etc) and so do Liverpool (Mane) we keep hold of these mediocre players on massive wages almost because the board don’t want to look like failures in taking a loss on the fee…..feck that any player after 2 back to back mediocre seasons should be sold.
Sancho is miles of the level we need to challenge and if we’re getting offers of 50m we should be packing his bags and driving him down to London because he’s mediocre as feck.
Sancho is miles of the level we need to challenge and if we’re getting offers of 50m we should be packing his bags and driving him down to London because he’s mediocre as feck.
While I agree with your point, Liverpool letting go of Mane was a mistake, it's more like shooting themselves in the foot. His replacement costs a lot more money and shite.
Maybe
But he’s dropped off massively at Bayern and apparently they want him gone for 20m
The higher ups at Liverpool will probably claim they could see him declining.
Yeah his replacements have been dog shit I agree.
It would be really dangerous to sell him this summer.
It's not sure whether we can buy a new striker and if we sell him, we would only have 3 players for 3 spots, Rashford, Antony and Garnacho/ I don't count Martial at all in this.
Even if we buy a striker I think by sellin Sancho we would be too short in front so I'd keep him for another just to rotate.
It's not sure whether we can buy a new striker and if we sell him, we would only have 3 players for 3 spots, Rashford, Antony and Garnacho/ I don't count Martial at all in this.
Even if we buy a striker I think by sellin Sancho we would be too short in front so I'd keep him for another just to rotate.
I don't think anyone is actually looking to buy him, but we should absolutely sell him if we can get 50m for him. He doesn't suit our team, and hasn't performed to the level expected. Flog him while his stock is still relatively high and move on.
It was in response to someone saying Maguire is £25m.
Sancho more than 50m
Maguire more than 25m.
- Status