HookedOnAPhelan
Full Member
Talented as he is he really, really lacks intensity. Lost possession so many times because of it today.
He has a bit sloppy passing sometimes but I see that as lack of rhythm problem. Also within our team. He is capable of not being sloppy due to his technique so it's just a rhythm thing, imo. I haven't seen those issues when passes generally is done a lot quicker. If it happens that he brings our attacking flow down because of passing then yeah, but I don't see it that way. I haven't seen him in a functional set up at United yet.Agree but my point was that his passing in general is bad (away from the box). It was like that before the break and it still does not improve after. I doubt you can improve those things much after certain age. So it might stay with him which would be annoying.
Naturally, our forwards will get tighter spaces when we start dominate more. He either gets used to it or he will just get sold.
That was always the case, even at Dortmund. He has never been explosive. He has good close control and can run fast at top speed, but he's like Anthony in that they're not traditional wide players that can regularly beat a man from a standing start.
Try him at 10.. Weghorst showed a different type of CAM to Bruno at the end vs Leeds and I think Sancho cam do even betterHe's better on the left than on the right, but I think Garnacho is a better prospect than him on the left in future. That's before you even consider playing Rashford there.
On the right he's probably not going to be as good as Antony, who isn't even top-tier himself.
Don't see how he ever really becomes a first choice at Utd, he'll have to make do as a rotation/bench option.
Yeah this is where I'm at with him. I think he has huge potential and I've always backed him, but Rashfords pace and directness is invaluable, and I don't see him being a striker long term (but should probably stay there this season). When we sign a striker this summer, Rashford will be set at LW. Garnacho as you say is the depth there. Then go to RW, and Antony provides great balance there, is Ten Hags guy, and we have Amad coming through as well as Pellistri. Obviously one of both might not make it, but that's just depth levels, all of them are young. Combine that with what he's earning... You just can't have a 350k player who doesn't have a long term starting spot nor current starting spot.He's better on the left than on the right, but I think Garnacho is a better prospect than him on the left in future. That's before you even consider playing Rashford there.
On the right he's probably not going to be as good as Antony, who isn't even top-tier himself.
Don't see how he ever really becomes a first choice at Utd, he'll have to make do as a rotation/bench option.
Yeah this is where I'm at with him. I think he has huge potential and I've always backed him, but Rashfords pace and directness is invaluable, and I don't see him being a striker long term (but should probably stay there this season). When we sign a striker this summer, Rashford will be set at LW. Garnacho as you say is the depth there. Then go to RW, and Antony provides great balance there, is Ten Hags guy, and we have Amad coming through as well as Pellistri. Obviously one of both might not make it, but that's just depth levels, all of them are young. Combine that with what he's earning... You just can't have a 350k player who doesn't have a long term starting spot nor current starting spot.
His best chance is as a 10, and basically filling in on either flank which is fine, not ideal at his wage but would give him plenty of game time. Bruno is 28, so if Sancho develops as a 10 he could eye that as a future starting spot. Have Rashford, Sancho, Antony as the 3 behind the striker, with Garnacho, Amad and Pellistri as the 3 youth guys with big futures. Bruno obviously starter for now as a 10, but if Sancho is 1st choice depth/competition for any of LW/#10/RW, then I think that's alright. That's kind of best case scenario for him. When we sign a striker (sell Martial), Rashford could be 2nd choice ST, so also have that scenario always where Sancho comes to the left and Rashford goes top. It's good that he is versatile, but yeah I think his path to being a starter is extremely limited.
I would be very interested to see him in that role. I actually believe he has all the tools, probably even better suited to that central position "on paper" compared to winger role.The reason I never saw the hype in him is because in the Bundesliga he seemed to beat the offside trap of a high line rather than actually take on his defender.
It was one of the main aspects of his game - literally beat the high line with a run and make a pass back for the striker to tap in.
Seemed too simple that he was doing it again and again.
Anyway, he is ours now and hope he comes good.
Even in the last game I believe his best 2 mins of performance came when he momentarily played centrally almost as a False 9/CAM. He looks much harder to read when he plays centrally because he can pass, dribble and shoot from so many different angles.
Hope he gets that position and becomes worth his price tag.
Ozil, Laudrup, BergkampSancho could be alright as a 10, but all the best 10s in the world like KDB, Fernandes and Odegaard tend to have both a passing and a shooting range which Sancho doesn't have so much of.
I'd like to think that Utd would be in a position over the next couple of seasons to sign whoever the actual next KDB/Fernandes appears to be, as Fernandes' understudy.