WeePat
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2015
- Messages
- 19,607
- Supports
- Chelsea
Fair play to them, very ambitious
If we must sign a striker, I think I prefer Toney over Osimhen. I’ve always said I prefer to show faith in Jackson’s development.
Fair play to them, very ambitious
Penny for Jackson, Nkunku and Felix's thoughts now
I doubt there's any money left for that, ideally I'd love for us to be reinforcing this summer, our wing options are terrible, particularly that LW spot.
Come on Utd don't give Chelsea free run at this
You want to have Højlund, Zirkzee and Toney in the same squad? You could probably do with an experienced striker, but surely with Toney in, one of the other two suffers with their minutes?
What really gets my goat is, Chelsea want Toney and will pay for him, they want Sancho but want a loan deal.
What really gets my goat is, Chelsea want Toney and will pay for him, they want Sancho but want a loan deal.
Toney is in the last year of his contract.
What really gets my goat is, Chelsea want Toney and will pay for him, they want Sancho but want a loan deal.
Toney won’t be allowed to go out on loan simply because that would mean he will walk for free and unless he were to sign a new deal ( which I would imagine just ain’t gonna happen ) then he has to be sold otherwise Brentford will be millions down.Bear in mind Toney is said to be on circa £20k a weekWhat really gets my goat is, Chelsea want Toney and will pay for him, they want Sancho but want a loan deal.
Sorry I have to disagree Toney is far from bang average. No he isnt world class but he is a total nuisance and would not just be a handful but would score at least 75% of the guilt edge chances that Jackson missedToney is bang average, but he'd be a better signing for Chelsea than he would be for us.
Chelsea were creating plenty of chances last year, and really just needed someone to stick the ball in the net. Jackson was spaffing sitters every week. Our problems are different.
Putting some pressure on Osimhen and Napoli would be my guess for these Toney to Chelsea rumors.
Osimhen is at a real risk of missing out on a move altogether. Napoli have already replaced him with the Lukaku signing and have been so sure of selling him this window they didn't even bother inviting him for pre-season. Now PSG have backed out and Osimhen doesn't want to go to Saudi Arabia so unless something crazy happens over the next few days there are very limited options out there for him.
Up until now Osimhen has been adamant he wants a permanent move with a contract around his current salary level and has considered a loan move to be 'beneath him' but the later we get in the window he might well have to change his mind if he wants to play this season. Chelsea have always been open to a loan with a buy option (perhaps even a conditional obligation) but have considered a straight permanent transfer to be too risky, considering the amount of money involved.
Now if briefing interest in an alternative target like Ivan Toney gets the gears turning, it might be worth it to try. At this point I don't believe we'll actually sign Toney though, or at least I think we shouldn't. While he's very much a decent player I just don't think he's a clear upgrade over Jackson and it's not like we're lacking in numbers so there's very little point in bringing in a player as expensive as Toney as just another body to compete for playing time with Nico.
I don’t think he’s particularly rated by many, it’s just the few who do tend to post a lot about wanting him.I honestly think Toney is overrated on this board.
It's almost like one is a better player than the other....What really gets my goat is, Chelsea want Toney and will pay for him, they want Sancho but want a loan deal.
He probably is, but he will score a lot of goals at Chelsea and that's not good for us.I honestly think Toney is overrated on this board.
This is like old (hopefully) United thinking though. £50M on another solid but non-spectacular player when we already have two strikers we've spent big money on. It'd be a massive waste of funds; next summer we need to really focus in on true world class players to add rather than more spent on guys like Toney.Yeah, so annoying we haven't the funds for bid
Completely agreeThis is like old (hopefully) United thinking though. £50M on another solid but non-spectacular player when we already have two strikers we've spent big money on. It'd be a massive waste of funds; next summer we need to really focus in on true world class players to add rather than more spent on guys like Toney.
He probably is, but he will score a lot of goals at Chelsea and that's not good for us.
Leave him for us then
What really gets my goat is, Chelsea want Toney and will pay for him, they want Sancho but want a loan deal.
This is like old (hopefully) United thinking though. £50M on another solid but non-spectacular player when we already have two strikers we've spent big money on. It'd be a massive waste of funds; next summer we need to really focus in on true world class players to add rather than more spent on guys like Toney.
£30M at absolute minimum (McT went for almost that); likely at least £40M in transfer fees. And then you're paying him, what, £200k a week for 4 years or something? So that's £40M in wages.He’s not going for anything like that in fairness, his price has been dropping on a weekly basis all Summer. When he eventually leaves, it’ll be for 30 tops.
The players have no one to blame but themselves. At Chelsea they are seen as cattle to be moved on once the latest shiny cow comes along.Like fecking clockwork: expected it once the Osihmen deal fell through. They literally cannot help themselves getting involved in every single transfer saga. Carragher said the other day “players need to stop signing for Chelsea”. I think as well current Chelsea players need to “stop signing new contracts”. Nicolas Jackson, RIP.
£30M at absolute minimum (McT went for almost that); likely at least £40M in transfer fees. And then you're paying him, what, £200k a week for 4 years or something? So that's £40M in wages.
All-in costs are probably £80M or so to have Toney for a few years in his decline phase, when Holljund could be as good as him as early as next season. This is the kind of disastrous short-term thinking we have to stop IMO to start competing again. Incurring £80M for a 28 year old whose non-world class on a team that's not a true contender even with him makes no sense at all. We're spending enough on guys like Mount/Eriksen/Casemiro/Lindelof that we could have added 1-2 of the top ~10 young players in the world with the equivalent money spent.
I think it'd be a horrible move to add Toney, personally, given the opportunity costs.
Ivan Toney wouldn’t be the worst signing…Who then?
He’s done it at Brentford so I fancy him to do it with United..There are currently 3 PL strikers playing that have 20+ goals in a season more than once - Haaland, Salah and Vardy, there are 4 currently who have done it once, Ings, Toney, Palmer and Son - slim pickings there
He’s done it at Brentford so I fancy him to do it with United..
Don’t tell that to @croadymanHe wouldn’t take pens here and he only scored 14 non penalty goals that season.
His other full season in the Prem he scored 7 non penalty goals.
Last season he had just 4 goals in 17 games.
I wouldn’t fancy him myself.
Only 14 in like half a season.He wouldn’t take pens here and he only scored 14 non penalty goals that season.
His other full season in the Prem he scored 7 non penalty goals.
Last season he had just 4 goals in 17 games.
I wouldn’t fancy him myself, he averages 11 non penalty goals over season in the Premier League, and that’s if he managed to play all 38 games.
It’s a pretty average record for a pretty average PL striker.