Ivan Perisic

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can't only buy superstars, you need to find players who fit into your tactics and playstyle.
I think Mourinho is good at finding players that fit his style, and if he signs Perisic, i trust he's been scouted for a while.
 
Have you listen to how Mourinho talks about Rashford, his work ethic and all? My guess we're pay two significant fees for positions, or better, players whose substitution needs serious addressing, Zlatan and Rooney.

I'm not debating Rashford. I'm just saying if we pay a big fee for Perisic, I think Mou intends him to be a starter. The other poster brought up Rashford.
 
Its not pretty much same thing , A 4141 or 451 gives more control and ball retention than a 4231 .

If morata reports Are true then he's a creative striker who can create as well, While Pogba and mata or Mkh too can be played together as 2 creative attacking midfeilders and another winger on the right, While if need more control then herrera and Pogba can be Paired together ahead of a DLP or DM to Press high and have more control. While Wingers and Full backs provide width.

Also thats why i like the idea of getting another wide creative option like maharez along with perisic.

Putting Mkhi or Mata in there instead of Herrera is plyaing with a #10 or AM, whcih is exactly what I said,it will never be a proper 4-1-4-1 with either of them in the team, and I'm not sure either of them offer enough anyway, we had them last season and got average returns.
 
Putting Mkhi or Mata in there instead of Herrera is plyaing with a #10 or AM, whcih is exactly what I said,it will never be a proper 4-1-4-1 with either of them in the team, and I'm not sure either of them offer enough anyway, we had them last season and got average returns.

But the difference this time will be the wingers who provide width which stretch the defense laterally with perisic and another wide player on opposite flank. which provides more space for attacking midfeilders to score and create and result in a more direct approach which would provide better penetration ( because of the Proactive defensive block in the middle which can quciky launch a direct pass resulting in counterattacking dynamics), than the full backs who provide width resulting in defensive organization which is deep and narrow which is really hard to score against.
 
Was at the game. He was poor. Slightly less so on the left but still very poor.

I wouldn't read much into it. A lot of players are poor for national teams after a long club season. Apparently he wasn't the only one either.
 
But the difference this time will be the wingers who provide width which stretch the defense laterally with perisic and another wide player on opposite flank. which provides more space for attacking midfeilders to score and create and result in a more direct approach which would provide better penetration ( because of the Proactive defensive block in the middle which can quciky launch a direct pass resulting in counterattacking dynamics), than the full backs who provide width resulting in defensive organization which is deep and narrow which is really hard to score against.


I get what you are saying but it's still the same problem, for starters we wont be getting a second winger, it's gonna be this guy and done, and the other problem is that you need a Griezmann or Muller or Dele Alli type in that hole behind Morata to make up the goals needed in that system.
 
I would prefer for us to be in for Douglas Costa instead, but I've come around on Perisic and think he could be helpful. Just have to keep remembering that £50m is the new £25m.

Certainly will be an upgrade on the performances of Martial out on the left. I'm happy with that honestly.
 
Mourinho expects his wide plays to drift towards the middle (one towards the box like a SS/WF e.g. Hazard and CR7, while the other drifts towards central attacking midfled e.g.. Willian and Di Maria). Crosses are expected from his LB and RB.

Even if you wanted a winger to cross the ball, Perisic is average at best. You would be better off with someone like James, Marcelo or Di Maria on the flank as they can actually deliver the ball with accuracy and consistency, and not just whip it across.

Yes, but can you name someone like those 3 who is available at a good price and does not need to be a starter every game? A winning team always needs some less fancied players who work hard to win. Going by what people now expect, Park Ji Sung should never have been signed by Fergie because there were so many better players available. We have a good squad. Jose needs to plug holes in it. That doesn't need a flashy winger given we already have so many, and he will want Rashford, Lingard, Martial, and Pererra to get some game time on the wings.
 
Going by what people now expect, Park Ji Sung should never have been signed by Fergie because there were so many better players available.

He was surrounded by elite attacking players like Scholes, Giggs, Ronaldo, Rooney and Tevez. It's completely different to our current situation.

We have a good squad. Jose needs to plug holes in it. That doesn't need a flashy winger given we already have so many, and he will want Rashford, Lingard, Martial, and Pererra to get some game time on the wings.

Look at the four players that you mentioned; Lingard is average, Rashford is decent at best and Pereira isn't really a wide player. That leaves Martial who is actually deserving of starting out wide for us.

The numbers argument doesn't work when most of them are mediocre.
 
Yes, but can you name someone like those 3 who is available at a good price and does not need to be a starter every game? A winning team always needs some less fancied players who work hard to win. Going by what people now expect, Park Ji Sung should never have been signed by Fergie because there were so many better players available. We have a good squad. Jose needs to plug holes in it. That doesn't need a flashy winger given we already have so many, and he will want Rashford, Lingard, Martial, and Pererra to get some game time on the wings.
We have a gaping hole of 'lacking in quality' and you think we should splurge 50m on a role player?

Of course if you had a complete squad which needed some specialist or multipurpose players, I can understand, but we should in no way be spending 50m on a 28yr old role player
 
Bang average tonight, but as others said wouldn't make too much of it as the whole Croatia side were a bit off.
 
So you would take Moura. I really do like him and he has tremendous acceleration; would he fit in a physical league, that would be the lingering question
Yeah indeed. Physicality shouldn't be an issue as the French league is pretty physical as well. I'd be more worried at Morata coping with the physicality of Prem rather than Moura tbh.
 
We have a gaping hole of 'lacking in quality' and you think we should splurge 50m on a role player?

Of course if you had a complete squad which needed some specialist or multipurpose players, I can understand, but we should in no way be spending 50m on a 28yr old role player

How does the money matter for United? It really doesn't. If we need to spend 50 m on a role player - so be it. I don't see why that's a problem! (Debt levels are no longer a worry). And we don't lack that much quality either -we have Martial + Rashford + Lingard + Pogba + Bailly all 1 year older (and 1 year closer to their peak). Lindelof is coming in. We are in the market for a big name striker (Morata is looking likely now). Mhiki and Ander are very good players nearing their peak.

So we don't lack as much quality as you think. If we weren't in Europa this season, our gap to Chelsea would have been much smaller - but, Europa has put us in a wonderful position at the start of this season, so I'm not complaining.
 
He was surrounded by elite attacking players like Scholes, Giggs, Ronaldo, Rooney and Tevez. It's completely different to our current situation.



Look at the four players that you mentioned; Lingard is average, Rashford is decent at best and Pereira isn't really a wide player. That leaves Martial who is actually deserving of starting out wide for us.

The numbers argument doesn't work when most of them are mediocre.

And Pogba + Mhiki + Mata are not not great attacking players? I'm sure before they were signed you would have thought they are among the best players in the market. Two of them just came into the league last year, and will probably be much more settled now. What we need is a very high quality no. 9 (especially with Zlatan released).

I mentioned only our youngsters who will be rotating in that wide left position with Persic (if he comes) and Mhiki. I think its the best way to develop Martial - give him enough competition that can keep him out of the side, but equally, show him he has much more talent and push him to nail his spot down. If Martial doesn't become a regular on that side this season, then I really think that Jose is going to let him go next summer.
 
How does the money matter for United? It really doesn't. If we need to spend 50 m on a role player - so be it. I don't see why that's a problem! (Debt levels are no longer a worry). And we don't lack that much quality either -we have Martial + Rashford + Lingard + Pogba + Bailly all 1 year older (and 1 year closer to their peak). Lindelof is coming in. We are in the market for a big name striker (Morata is looking likely now). Mhiki and Ander are very good players nearing their peak.

So we don't lack as much quality as you think. If we weren't in Europa this season, our gap to Chelsea would have been much smaller - but, Europa has put us in a wonderful position at the start of this season, so I'm not complaining.
If we didnt lack quality we wouldnt have finished 6th last season and drawn so many games. All the other teams also have young players that have grown a year older and closer to their peak, but it is of little use when your peak is low. The competition is also improving and adding more quality players. Mkhi, Herrera, Mata and Valencia are already in their peak window and will likely start to decline in 1-2 seasons. So we need to add quality faster than we are losing them and faster than the competition. We simply dont have the luxury of adding more mediocrity - we have too much of that already.

The money matters cos we do not have enough attacking quality yet and thus cannot afford to waste 50m on a player that wont take us to the next level. Its not just about spending 50m but what you spend it on. Inter themselves got Perisic for 19m euros just 2 seasons ago and there has been no improvement in his game that would warrant a 50m price tag. Worse still, at 28, expect him to start declining in 1-2yrs. Pay50m for 2yrs of average productivity would be simply ridiculous. I would rather we spend 100m on young talent that has high potential to be world class than waste it on a 28yr old that has been nothing but average his entire career.
 
I'm not debating Rashford. I'm just saying if we pay a big fee for Perisic, I think Mou intends him to be a starter. The other poster brought up Rashford.
The fact is that we are going to be competing in the Premier League, FA Cup, EFL Cup, and Champions League this season. If we want to compete in all four (or even three out of four) then it will be crucial to have a deep squad. Mourinho knows that, for positions like wingers, having a minimum of two players capable of starting on each side is crucial when playing for more than one trophy. Let's say we sign Morata, Perisic, and Fabinho on top of Lindelof. I still guarantee that all four of them, Rashford, Martial, Mkhitaryan, Fellaini, Mata, Blind, and Rojo all play major minutes this season. We will need a deep squad.

My bet is guys like Mkhitaryan, Morata, Blind, and Perisic will play most of the European matches. Rashford, Martial, Mata, and Fellaini will probably star in the FA and EFL competitions. And the Premier League will feature a variety of mixtures of our team.
 
The fact is that we are going to be competing in the Premier League, FA Cup, EFL Cup, and Champions League this season. If we want to compete in all four (or even three out of four) then it will be crucial to have a deep squad. Mourinho knows that, for positions like wingers, having a minimum of two players capable of starting on each side is crucial when playing for more than one trophy. Let's say we sign Morata, Perisic, and Fabinho on top of Lindelof. I still guarantee that all four of them, Rashford, Martial, Mkhitaryan, Fellaini, Mata, Blind, and Rojo all play major minutes this season. We will need a deep squad.

My bet is guys like Mkhitaryan, Morata, Blind, and Perisic will play most of the European matches. Rashford, Martial, Mata, and Fellaini will probably star in the FA and EFL competitions. And the Premier League will feature a variety of mixtures of our team.
Mourinho does not rotate his players much. Once he settles on his starting XI, he will use the same set every game unless injured or absent. He expects his players to be fit to play 2x a week.
 
If we didnt lack quality we wouldnt have finished 6th last season and drawn so many games. All the other teams also have young players that have grown a year older and closer to their peak, but it is of little use when your peak is low. The competition is also improving and adding more quality players. Mkhi, Herrera, Mata and Valencia are already in their peak window and will likely start to decline in 1-2 seasons. So we need to add quality faster than we are losing them and faster than the competition. We simply dont have the luxury of adding more mediocrity - we have too much of that already.

The money matters cos we do not have enough attacking quality yet and thus cannot afford to waste 50m on a player that wont take us to the next level. Its not just about spending 50m but what you spend it on. Inter themselves got Perisic for 19m euros just 2 seasons ago and there has been no improvement in his game that would warrant a 50m price tag. Worse still, at 28, expect him to start declining in 1-2yrs. Pay50m for 2yrs of average productivity would be simply ridiculous. I would rather we spend 100m on young talent that has high potential to be world class than waste it on a 28yr old that has been nothing but average his entire career.

Yes, we drew games - but it was because of poor finishing (and not poor quality in the attacking third). I'm surprised you think our whole attack needs to change because of that. What we need is to add proper finishers - hopefully 2 of them. 1 looks like it will be Morata and the second is anyone's guess (i.e. Rooney's replacement). Perhaps if Jose thinks Zlatan will be willing to sign a new contract once he is fit again, he may not even look for a second.

Now that we have a CB, what we need is a top class DM (to take over from Carrick), and a good winger who will hug the touchline on the left. (Notice how Rashford played most of last season. The only reason he got picked before Martial IMO is because of his willingness to make the pitch bigger and his constant running on the wing. Martial always looked to cut back in). If we get Persic, it frees up Rashford to play as a CF.

Anything else - like Griezmann (which has failed), James (don't think we are going for him), and Belotti (again, he looks more like a Morata back-up than a first choice) - will be a plus.
 
Ivan Perisic
He is a Ban`s hero
Caf thinks he is Croatian Ashley Young
and rather have De Niro
 
Didn't impress me yesterday against Iceland. Was up against inexperienced fullback and didn't do much damage...
 
I only know him from his years in the Bundesliga (Dortmund + Wolfsburg). If this time is in any way representative of his current quality, we should run away as fast as possible. During this time he was clearly not good enough to cut it at a top club. Maybe he is a late bloomer who really stepped up his game lately. I don't know because I didn't follow the italian league, but I have strong doubts that this is actually true.
 
Last edited:
We have a gaping hole of 'lacking in quality' and you think we should splurge 50m on a role player?

Of course if you had a complete squad which needed some specialist or multipurpose players, I can understand, but we should in no way be spending 50m on a 28yr old role player
100% This.
There seems to be an idea that we have a lot of special quality in our team and most importantly, we don't need to invest in special quality because they ones we bought were flops. If we consider the so called big names we've recently signed:

RVP - Won us the title

Falcao - Joined us after a bad ACL surgery on a loan. Went back to Monaco and did very well for them.

ADM - Said he didn't want to be here anyway, so what did we expect. Even then, when he was bothered, he was arguably the best player in the league in the first few months.

Pogba - Still young and has shown flashes of quality that will improve with maturity.

Zlatan - Not a flop end of. But is going home anyway

I'd add Martial and Micky, but they are not at that level of quality to be considered "world class" talent just yet. And even if they were, should a club of United's stature not pursue more players that fill the gap of quality? We have too many run of the mill players. After the hustle and bustle of managing to get into the top 4, we need to invest in the best out there. We do not have the luxury of the EL to help us into the CL next season, bearing in mind that we finished 6th and or rivals are arguably better than us as it stands.
 
100% This.
There seems to be an idea that we have a lot of special quality in our team and most importantly, we don't need to invest in special quality because they ones we bought were flops. If we consider the so called big names we've recently signed:

RVP - Won us the title

Falcao - Joined us after a bad ACL surgery on a loan. Went back to Monaco and did very well for them.

ADM - Said he didn't want to be here anyway, so what did we expect. Even then, when he was bothered, he was arguably the best player in the league in the first few months.

Pogba - Still young and has shown flashes of quality that will improve with maturity.

Zlatan - Not a flop end of. But is going home anyway

I'd add Martial and Micky, but they are not at that level of quality to be considered "world class" talent just yet. And even if they were, should a club of United's stature not pursue more players that fill the gap of quality? We have too many run of the mill players. After the hustle and bustle of managing to get into the top 4, we need to invest in the best out there. We do not have the luxury of the EL to help us into the CL next season, bearing in mind that we finished 6th and or rivals are arguably better than us as it stands.
As I have highlighted in other threads, complaining about not having enough "special quality" as you put it, is all well and good, but if the players that will add quality in those positions are not available then we have to work with what they've got. Everywhere in the transfer forum I see people moaning about the lack of attacking quality, but I don't see many attempts to put forward genuinely attainable names. Also it's worth remembering that we earmarked (and had a deal with) exactly the kind of player you're talking about, the only one close to the quality needed available, and that fell through due to circumstances beyond our control. We can't just beat our chests and say "a club of our stature should have better players" and expect those players to fall into our laps.

Case in point: I would absolutely love us to sign Sanchez, but Wenger will never sell to us, not least because of our dealings with him in the past, but also because he have no incentive to sell to us, and every incentive not to. Same with Kane at Spurs. Same with Dybala at Juventus. People forget how many things have to go right in order to sign a player. You have to convince the club you're compensating them sufficiently, you have to convince the player that moving to you is better than staying where they are (or better than moving somewhere else). You have to make sure their family is going to be happy. You have to make sure they feel like it's a good career move. There are so many things beyond your control.

The funny thing is, the player closest to the kind you and others are talking about, with the kind of quality you are talking about, that is actually available is James Rodriguez. And yet every time he's linked to us everyone starts mumbling about Di Maria and not wanting Madrid rejects. The level of entitlement from our fans sometimes beggars belief.
 
As I have highlighted in other threads, complaining about not having enough "special quality" as you put it, is all well and good, but if the players that will add quality in those positions are not available then we have to work with what they've got. Everywhere in the transfer forum I see people moaning about the lack of attacking quality, but I don't see many attempts to put forward genuinely attainable names. Also it's worth remembering that we earmarked (and had a deal with) exactly the kind of player you're talking about, the only one close to the quality needed available, and that fell through due to circumstances beyond our control. We can't just beat our chests and say "a club of our stature should have better players" and expect those players to fall into our laps.

Case in point: I would absolutely love us to sign Sanchez, but Wenger will never sell to us, not least because of our dealings with him in the past, but also because he have no incentive to sell to us, and every incentive not to. Same with Kane at Spurs. Same with Dybala at Juventus. People forget how many things have to go right in order to sign a player. You have to convince the club you're compensating them sufficiently, you have to convince the player that moving to you is better than staying where they are (or better than moving somewhere else). You have to make sure their family is going to be happy. You have to make sure they feel like it's a good career move. There are so many things beyond your control.

The funny thing is, the player closest to the kind you and others are talking about, with the kind of quality you are talking about, that is actually available is James Rodriguez. And yet every time he's linked to us everyone starts mumbling about Di Maria and not wanting Madrid rejects. The level of entitlement from our fans sometimes beggars belief.

:lol: drama queens, the lot of them. Would want a fragrant 'kerchief to wipe their arse when all they need is good 'ol toilet paper. If they weren't fellow fans, I'd hope they remain stuck with sand paper (that's Lingard by the way).
 
Pehhhh-ruhhhh-sich, sich, sich
Our new winger, life's a bitch
Perisic, sich, sich
Someone get him off the pitch
50 mil, what the fuck
Inter can't believe their luck
Come on Ed, knock us dead
See you in the Sanchez thread.
 
:lol: drama queens, the lot of them. Would want a fragrant 'kerchief to wipe their arse when all they need is good 'ol toilet paper. If they weren't fellow fans, I'd hope they remain stuck with sand paper (that's Lingard by the way).
I just think people are in denial a little. Missing out on Griezmann was a big blow and our fans are struggling to come to terms with the fact that there's no obvious player out there we can sign as a direct alternative.
 
As I have highlighted in other threads, complaining about not having enough "special quality" as you put it, is all well and good, but if the players that will add quality in those positions are not available then we have to work with what they've got. Everywhere in the transfer forum I see people moaning about the lack of attacking quality, but I don't see many attempts to put forward genuinely attainable names. Also it's worth remembering that we earmarked (and had a deal with) exactly the kind of player you're talking about, the only one close to the quality needed available, and that fell through due to circumstances beyond our control. We can't just beat our chests and say "a club of our stature should have better players" and expect those players to fall into our laps.

Case in point: I would absolutely love us to sign Sanchez, but Wenger will never sell to us, not least because of our dealings with him in the past, but also because he have no incentive to sell to us, and every incentive not to. Same with Kane at Spurs. Same with Dybala at Juventus. People forget how many things have to go right in order to sign a player. You have to convince the club you're compensating them sufficiently, you have to convince the player that moving to you is better than staying where they are (or better than moving somewhere else). You have to make sure their family is going to be happy. You have to make sure they feel like it's a good career move. There are so many things beyond your control.

The funny thing is, the player closest to the kind you and others are talking about, with the kind of quality you are talking about, that is actually available is James Rodriguez. And yet every time he's linked to us everyone starts mumbling about Di Maria and not wanting Madrid rejects. The level of entitlement from our fans sometimes beggars belief.

Exactly this. Has anyone moaning about Perisic got an answer to this?
 
Yes, we drew games - but it was because of poor finishing (and not poor quality in the attacking third). I'm surprised you think our whole attack needs to change because of that. What we need is to add proper finishers - hopefully 2 of them. 1 looks like it will be Morata and the second is anyone's guess (i.e. Rooney's replacement). Perhaps if Jose thinks Zlatan will be willing to sign a new contract once he is fit again, he may not even look for a second.

Now that we have a CB, what we need is a top class DM (to take over from Carrick), and a good winger who will hug the touchline on the left. (Notice how Rashford played most of last season. The only reason he got picked before Martial IMO is because of his willingness to make the pitch bigger and his constant running on the wing. Martial always looked to cut back in). If we get Persic, it frees up Rashford to play as a CF.

Anything else - like Griezmann (which has failed), James (don't think we are going for him), and Belotti (again, he looks more like a Morata back-up than a first choice) - will be a plus.
We had Zlatan carrying the team in goals and assists for most of the season and you think we dont lack quality? Herrera finishes as our assist leader and you think our problem is just finishing?

Yes Morata solves the problem of an injured and aged Zlatan but his arrival does not fix the problem of why we were so dependent on him. It simply puts us back to where we were at the start of last season.

We dont need a winger to hug the touch line as the full backs are expected to provide width, which is what you see in most teams. Who ever plays as LWF will be expected to drift inward and not hug the touch line.

what we do need is quality that can both create an score goals as attacking midfielders, either he plays centrally or on the flanks is less relevant
 
Its not pretty much same thing , A 4141 or 451 gives more control and ball retention than a 4231 .

If morata reports Are true then he's a creative striker who can create as well, While Pogba and mata or Mkh too can be played together as 2 creative attacking midfeilders and another winger on the right, While if need more control then herrera and Pogba can be Paired together ahead of a DLP or DM to Press high and have more control. While Wingers and Full backs provide width.

Also thats why i like the idea of getting another wide creative option like maharez along with perisic.
A little bit too much stock is put into paper formations. 442, 451 etc. There was a poster here a year or two ago that banged on daily about how it was in fact utterly irrelevant. I wouldn't go to that extent, but I do agree with him that top level football is about far far more than fecking numbered formations. More pertinent is to look at how Mourinho wants his players to play, rather than talking about the 'subtleties' of different (rather irrelevant) formations.
 
Pehhhh-ruhhhh-sich, sich, sich
Our new winger, life's a bitch
Perisic, sich, sich
Someone get him off the pitch
50 mil, what the fuck
Inter can't believe their luck
Come on Ed, knock us dead
See you in the Sanchez thread.
:lol:
 
As I have highlighted in other threads, complaining about not having enough "special quality" as you put it, is all well and good, but if the players that will add quality in those positions are not available then we have to work with what they've got. Everywhere in the transfer forum I see people moaning about the lack of attacking quality, but I don't see many attempts to put forward genuinely attainable names. Also it's worth remembering that we earmarked (and had a deal with) exactly the kind of player you're talking about, the only one close to the quality needed available, and that fell through due to circumstances beyond our control. We can't just beat our chests and say "a club of our stature should have better players" and expect those players to fall into our laps.

Case in point: I would absolutely love us to sign Sanchez, but Wenger will never sell to us, not least because of our dealings with him in the past, but also because he have no incentive to sell to us, and every incentive not to. Same with Kane at Spurs. Same with Dybala at Juventus. People forget how many things have to go right in order to sign a player. You have to convince the club you're compensating them sufficiently, you have to convince the player that moving to you is better than staying where they are (or better than moving somewhere else). You have to make sure their family is going to be happy. You have to make sure they feel like it's a good career move. There are so many things beyond your control.

The funny thing is, the player closest to the kind you and others are talking about, with the kind of quality you are talking about, that is actually available is James Rodriguez. And yet every time he's linked to us everyone starts mumbling about Di Maria and not wanting Madrid rejects. The level of entitlement from our fans sometimes beggars belief.
I can give you some names: James, Ozil, Forsberg, Lemar, Brandt, Isigne

All better options than 50m Perisic
 
I wouldn't read too much into it. End of a long season. Alli was godawful against Scotland.

Yeah agreed, just an observation since I tried to watch him closer because of the link with United. Don't think he had a bad game but still was expecting much more...
 
Exactly this. Has anyone moaning about Perisic got an answer to this?
No answer needed. Even if no better players were available, that's not a very good reason to spend 40-50m on Perisic. Those advocating for his signing haven't exactly put forward a very strong case either. A 28 y/o who has never excelled at any of his clubs, had one of the worst conversion rates among players in the top 5 leagues last season and the best things people can say about him is that he's a hard worker, two footed with decent pace. This just doesn't sound like a 40-50m player to me, and it certainly doesn't sound like the attacking player we need.

If we had a stronger attack, and we were looking to sign Perisic for a reasonable fee to add depth and tactical flexibility, people would be a lot more positive about this. For 40-50m as our signature attacking signing, it's easy to see why they're not.
 
No answer needed. Even if no better players were available, that's not a very good reason to spend 40-50m on Perisic. Those advocating for his signing haven't exactly put forward a very strong case either. A 28 y/o who has never excelled at any of his clubs, had one of the worst conversion rates among players in the top 5 leagues last season and the best things people can say about him is that he's a hard worker, two footed with decent pace. This just doesn't sound like a 40-50m player to me, and it certainly doesn't sound like the attacking player we need.

If we had a stronger attack, and we were looking to sign Perisic for a reasonable fee to add depth and tactical flexibility, people would be a lot more positive about this. For 40-50m as our signature attacking signing, it's easy to see why they're not.


That's for players who scored more than 10 league goals, not many wingers did that, so it's not a proper stat.

Wingers who scored more than 10 goals:
Insigne, Salah, Callejon, Piatti, Pedro Leon, Carrasco, Robben, Hazard, Son, Coutinho, Walcott. (might have missed few and all these players are not strictly wingers)

Saying his work rate is the only thing he is good at is wrong, completely wrong.

He isn't a 50 Million player for sure but he is lot better than some think here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.