City in 2005 were just about staying in the PL, you mean chelsea. But still, how is perisic going to give us the best possible chance? when we would still lose a player in the process, when united are over booked in the attacking wide area's. If united are going to spend a bucket load, they may is well pay 100 million for someone truly special. Rashford, martial, mkhi, mata, think Jose needs to make sure we get more out of these guys, who can its about how the team is set up. Martial can easily fill in the gap on the left, with Mkhi and rashford interchanging with rashford to support lukaku. Its not about options which the team has got, its about style of play, and going for the kill we have been too defensive. Perisic next year will most likely cost half of what inter want, and we would still be having the same options if we got perisic, maybe weaker since inter want not only a huge sum of money, and martial on loan. I would rather the club look at our fullback area, and luckily the club has dodged the bullet
The way some are saying, we have a team full of youth players, the team has got a good mix, with this mix it allows martial and rashford to develop. When team's backbone is DDG, bailey, valenica, pogba, herrera, matic, mata, mkhi, lukaku, there is a stellar experience of players to allow someone like rashford and martial to develop, when you have that in the squad to play with, its a great chance to allow those 2 to develop, we not short of experience so yeah I would rather these 2 on the pitch, than give a player like perisic at the age he is at a chance ahead of players like rashford and martial who will get better and better. Now a LB if shaw does not get fit is what the club needs to look at