Suedesi
Full Member
Yes and i don't dispute most of that, but i was makng the point that mourinho still seemed to get exactly who he had wanted previously, then after moaning, he suddenly got them and won the treble. Mourinho simply isn't like other managers, they don't have his huge public profile, his personality, or his record. The general way of things in milan does not explain how it all just came together at that point, without a change in Inter's usual policy and then some serious input from Mourinho. It was the directors somewhat relenting to Mourinho's wishes in this manner that i was recalling. Jose got what he moaned for and Inter won the treble.
Yes but they spent huge mostly during mourinho's time, and it was the only time they won a treble, or even got anywhere near a CL final. Mourinho's strategy has always been the same, at every post Porto club he has been at. Targeting whatever he thinks he needs to win, and he isn't interested in how much is spent, as long as he gets what he needs to get the job done.
Whatever Inter's usual procedures, it seems far more likely that jose had more input than other managers, it just doesn't make sense otherwise. An unhappy Jose, -who isn't getting things his way- is simply not someone who will bond a team together and inspire a treble run for owners who don't back him. That Jose is the petulant spoilt child that causes division and disruption throughout the club and then gets sacked when he goes too far.
The Jose that took Inter to the Treble was the passionate, determined, driven and tactically inspirational Jose, that knows he has exactly what he needs to win and he gets on with achieving it by any means necessary.
There's a tendency in England to glorify managers beyond any other country, and Mourinho is a master of taking all the credit when things go well, and blaming imaginary enemies when they don't.
Inter in 2009-11 weren't exactly Stoke, they had great pedigree and personnel. Coming off 3 consecutive scudettos and with Juve and Milan decimated from the Calciopoli scandal (and Inter picking off Zlatan & Vieira off Juve, while other stars left) winning domestically wasn't the problem. They had grown progressively in Europe (We knocked them out in 09 at QF stage) but couldn't make that next step. In that aspect Mourinho helped, and helped a lot. Agreed.
However this narrative that he asked for players and he built the perfect team is off. He didn't - the backbone of the team was there - I'm talking Julio Cesar, Materazzi, Zanetti, Samuel, Chivu, Cambiasso, Zlatan (swapped for Eto'o and cash in his second year - not because of Jose, but because Zlatan decided to try Catalonia and Eto'o didn't want to sit on the bench). As I mentioned Milito and Thiago were booked deals in advance with Genoa (Inter has a great relationship with Genoa, they will get Matia Perin next who they've monitoring for 2 yrs). Mourinho buys were Sneijder, Lucio and Quaresma. He got the team to perform for 1 season in the CL and then the wheels fell off.
Mourinho is no Ferguson. He's never built a team organically, or investing in youth and nurturing the talent that way. He needs 28-29-30-31 year olds to win and win now, so he can feck off to the next club. Works great for Mourinho, not so great for the club. That's why I hate this fixation with Perisic and Matic, old farts who will play for 1 or 2 seasons and then be sent to the glue factory.