And Israels response.
Israeli Professor Neve Gordon, vice president of BRISMES and professor of international law and human rights at Queen Mary University in London, [...]
“If I were to teach in a class the Human Rights Watch report stating that Israel is an apartheid state, I could be accused of anti-Semitism,” Gordon said.
UN's top court gives opinion on Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories
Watch Live: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c2x05n7m3xet#player
the zionist mind is a marvel
It is advisory only. That'll be the line. Always is."We reject the ICJ's ruling"
Yeah that's not how it works pal.
Keen to see how the US worm their way around this damning verdict.
Mix of usual talking points I assume."We reject the ICJ's ruling"
Yeah that's not how it works pal.
Keen to see how the US worm their way around this damning verdict.
Yesterday I had one of the craziest conversations of my life. There was an israeli bloke in the group I was it and of course this topic came up. He said there were no civilians in palestine because they chose hamas. I asked what about israeli civilians? They also elected the government that's attacking palestine, are they also a legitimate target?
He said they are, that october 7 was a legitimate attack on hamas' part, that this is an existential war, one side will exist in a hundred years and the other will not. There are innocents or civilians on either side.
Everyone kept avoiding him for the rest of the evening.
Well, that's actually more honest than what you'll hear from the majority of Israelis.
He seems lovely.
Alongside Blinken, they're the most despicable, pathological liars and the symbol of the foreign policy failure of this US administration.Wait for just a couple of days and we'll see this duo ignore, sidestep, and attack this ruling
Honestly, because they speak in English and get more intl exposure, more hateful to me than most of the Israeli leadership when it comes to this war.
They actually do.Mix of usual talking points I assume.
Stuff like that.
- The ruling is "non binding".
- The ICJ don't have "jurisdiction" on this.
- A Palestinian state has to be negotiated between Israel/Palestinians themselves and not imposed on them by the international community.
That's not crazy at all, it's normalized now.Yesterday I had one of the craziest conversations of my life. There was an israeli bloke in the group I was it and of course this topic came up. He said there were no civilians in palestine because they chose hamas. I asked what about israeli civilians? They also elected the government that's attacking palestine, are they also a legitimate target?
He said they are, that october 7 was a legitimate attack on hamas' part, that this is an existential war, one side will exist in a hundred years and the other will not. There are innocents or civilians on either side.
Everyone kept avoiding him for the rest of the evening.
Everyone is going with the fact it's just an advisory like it's just a throwaway opinion.Looking forward to to hear from all those in this thread saying we needed to wait for a court to say something about the illegality of israel's actions. I'm sure they'll be right along admitting they were wrong.