Idxomer
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 16,618
That absolutely was and still is an option on the table, even if less likely at the moment. Netanyahu and his cabinet saw the opportunity to turn a security disaster into a major land gain. Blinken doing rounds in the Middle-East to see which Arab country would be willing to take Gazans right after 10/7 whilst Israel "cleans" Gaza from Hamas (which will never happen) was part of it. Forget about civilian deaths, the systematic destruction of housing, education, medical, religious and administrative buildings in the last 8 months is part of it. The man-made famine that will have devastating consequences on Gaza children's development in the next decades is part of it.As far as I know its a minority view and there are no realistic Israeli Prime Minister contenders who could follow Netanyahu who share Ben Gvir's view. Its also worth noting that Ben Gvir is talking about permanently taking Gaza and sending the current inhabitants to other countries. Netanyahu's policy appears to be that Gazans should live in Gaza after the war with an "Israeli security envelope" around Gaza (probably closer to the pre-10.7 status quo, minus Hamas). I would be interested in knowing Amir's view as well.
The concessions Likhud would have to make wouldn't be as sweeping as annexing the entire Gaza strip (imo). Also, whatever the next Israeli government is, would need to start mending fences Internationally, especially in the US followed by Europe. Any attempt to annex land in Gaza would be met with fierce protest among Israeli's biggest international allies. Either way, Bibi is likely done politically after this so I don't think Likhud will be as big a force than when he was driving their agenda.
I wouldn't say reckless, they aren't. They know exactly how much they can get away with and they've been proved right every single time.That's assume that it's perceived as concessions and not a goal or an opportunity. The only actual difference between the far right and supposed moderates right wingers is that the former are reckless but the desires are the same.
Hamas' attack on Oct 7 shattered the status quo, which Hamas and all of the Palestinians in Gaza (and arguably the WB as well) were trapped in seemingly permanently. I don't believe the world will allow a return to it.As far as I know its a minority view and there are no realistic Israeli Prime Minister contenders who could follow Netanyahu who share Ben Gvir's view. Its also worth noting that Ben Gvir is talking about permanently taking Gaza and sending the current inhabitants to other countries. Netanyahu's policy appears to be that Gazans should live in Gaza after the war with an "Israeli security envelope" around Gaza (probably closer to the pre-10.7 status quo, minus Hamas). I would be interested in knowing Amir's view as well.
You're underestimating how much fertile terrain in the Israeli society has for his ideas.
The settlers represent 10% of the Israeli population and this percentage is bound to exponentially grow in the coming years. An ever increasing part of the Israeli youth shares Ben Gvir's ideology and vote for him. There's a notable amount of IDF commanders who are settlers and there already were 16% of them in 2014. They're not niche voters.
Thinking that the problem will go away when Netanyahu, Ben Gvir and Smotrich are ousted is a false assumption. In fact, you can expect an even greater shift to the far-right from the Israeli society in the coming years/decades.
@Amir or @ScholesyTheWise, feel free to correct me.
I wouldn't say reckless, they aren't. They know exactly how much they can get away with and they've been proved right every single time.
They're just more "in your face", which is what makes the West a bit uncomfortable.
Probably a bit misleading since he's plucking out the most extreme Israeli politician (who is himself a settler) and projecting it as if its Israeli policy, when in fact its apparently a fringe position in Israeli politics.
I remember when I went to Israel in 2010 the big bogeyman of the Israeli right was Avigdor Lieberman, who planned to draw Israel’s borders to exclude the Arab towns of the Triangle and came out with crazy suggestions like bombing the Aswan dam. Today no opposition coalition can hope to replace the right without including his party.
A few years later Naftali Bennett emerged as the new bogeyman, bluntly stating over and over what Netanyahu generally downplayed publicly - there will be no Palestinian state and that’s that. He committed political career suicide by forming the only non-Netanyahu led government since 2009 in coalition with a bizarre collection of parties and in doing so completely alienating his religious nationalist base.
Today it’s Ben Gvir and Smotrich, representing slightly alternative manifestations of Kahanism (Ben Gvir being more recognizably a product and disciple of Kahane). Ten years ago it probably would have been accurate to describe them as “fringe”. Five years ago Netanyahu legitimized them in an attempt to save his own neck (he had heavily criticized Kahane’s followers who committed the massacre in Hebron and assassinated Rabin in the 90s) and they became active players on the political scene, if still representing a small but growing minority. Obviously their presence being consolidated with their ascent to governance in 2022.
We can’t yet tell what the long-term political fallout of October 7th will be in Israel, but it’s fair to speculate today whether it has tipped the country over the edge into becoming essentially a Kahanist society, at least to some significant degree vis-a-vis the Palestinian question. This may be a passing madness destined to recede once this insane war is brought to an end, and I’m sure that will prove the case with many individuals. But it’s likely enough that the views expressed by the man himself - widely mocked and derided during his political campaigns in the 80s - will, going forward, represent a significant or even majority element of mainstream political discourse in Israel, across the spectrum. If that is the case, then it’s not too important if the Religious Zionism/Otzma Yehudit coalition continues to garner only 10% of the vote in future elections, or collapses and disappears from the scene altogether - demographics, ideology, conflict, and above all the exercise of raw power have consolidated the far-rightist shift, and mean we’ll probably be hearing stuff like this for years to come from sources previously thought “moderate” or “pragmatic”. Indeed you don’t need to look hard over the last eight months to find such examples:
You're underestimating how much fertile terrain the Israeli society has for his ideas.
The settlers represent 10% of the Israeli population and this percentage is bound to exponentially grow in the coming years. An ever increasing part of the Israeli youth shares Ben Gvir's ideology and votes for him. There's a notable amount of IDF commanders who are settlers and there already were 16% of them in 2014. They're not niche voters.
Thinking that the problem will go away when Netanyahu, Ben Gvir and Smotrich are ousted is a false assumption. In fact, you can expect an even greater shift to the far-right from the Israeli society in the coming years/decades.
@Amir or @ScholesyTheWise, feel free to correct me.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/07/us/politics/george-clooney-biden-white-house-icc.htmlThe actor contacted a top official to protest the president’s denunciation of the move to seek arrest warrants for top Israeli officials over the war in Gaza, a case his wife worked on.
Great news.
It seems legit. It is all over media outlets.I don't know whether it's true, but rumors are doing the rounds. Noa is the girl from the infamous clip where she's seen on a motorbike being taken away from her partner.
Her mother is terminally ill with brain cancer, the home-hospice firm I work for is treating her.
I hope she is well.
This will probbly secure Bibi with more voters, sadly. people are idiots.
He has a habbit of addressing the media in the singular form, "I gave the order to do this and that, I made the sun shine in the morning..."
No human life is worth more or less. Of course death of innocent people is tragic. But it is the kidnappers who should have thought about this. They of course dont. They dont even agree with the first sentence.Yes, this is very heart-warming.
I wonder, given your posting history on this thread,
How do you go about the dozens of people who died in Nusairat last night,
in order for the IDF to create the destruction+distraction to achieve this?
Not trying to give you shit, just wondering.
They got the hostages and killed many palestinians, that was precisely the goal.Israel just rescued four hostages in a "precise" operation that massacred 200+. Congratulations!
Israel just rescued four hostages in a "precise" operation that massacred 200+. Congratulations!