To be honest, I think that you can accuse anyone of deliberately inflating/deflating numbers in these type of contexts simply because there is a communication war alongside the actual war. The issue for me is that the likelyhood of these figures being grossly underrated, in the case of Gaza City you are talking about an area that has a similar population density than New York, do people actually believe that bombarding entire New York neighborhoods would lead to less than 10k being killed even if you partially evacuated the city? To me that's implausible.
Point taken.
I also personally find 11,000 dead to be astonishingly "low" when we consider the hell Israel decided to unleash on Gaza for more than a month now, but I'm not there. I can only base my judgment on what Hamas claims, that's everything we got and their numbers were never really contested by anyone in the past. It's still a terrifying amount of casualties for the most moral army in the world that pretends to take every single measure to spare civilians. Especially when more than 90% of the victims are civilians and 50% are children. The IAF willfully repeatedly and bombed the biggest refugee camp, killing dozens, if not hundreds of Palestinians, just to get a few Hamas members. Or so they say. You have Netanyahu openly saying that all civilian deaths are Hamas responsibility. In other words, Israel just doesn't give a feck. I'd hate to imagine what it would look like if the IDF went all in. Might as well as drop a nuke or two and spare us the suspense.
What I personally find particularly hard to wrap my head around is the deliberate denial of access to food, water and medical aid. The video I posted before about Emily Callahan truly sent a chill down my spine. The most critical and constant concern was
water. How can one refuse civilians access to water and claim to be on the
"side of light"? How can governments tell with a straight face that it's got something to do with self-defense? How can this absolutely inhumane measure fall on so many deaf ears? How can't it be considered as a collective punishment? Any other country in the world that would've done that would've been panned, banned, boycotted and eventually bombed into oblivion, and that's not even talking about what was happening in Gaza and in the West Bank for decades.
I hate to bring the race card, but I'm starting to think that Arab lives in general and the Palestinians in particular just don't matter. You have a Florida republican state representative (Michelle Salzman) openly advocate for the extermination of the Palestinians without anyone really batting an eyelid. Not that she's the only one, mind. Could you imagine the reaction if it was the other way around?
On a side note:
"France weren't the occupiers in Algeria". Like, really? I know that Algeria was considered as a "département" and part of France, but it certainly wasn't the case for the indigenous population. They were, at best, second rate citizens with no political rights. We can debate about semantics all day long, but I don't think that France being an occupying and colonizing power in Algeria is really subject to debate. Unless I misunderstood you.