Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Nobody is banning you. Nobody has suggested banning you. The overwhelming majority of responses to you have been respectful and within the spirit of normal debate.

You made a comment earlier in the conflict about how providing your sworn enemy with water and electricity is a dumb thing to do, in the grand scheme of things and were perplexed when people replied to you about the war crime of stopping water. You 'posed a question' on whether its really that historically weird to colonise land conquered in war, considering the history of humanity and were perplexed when people replied to you, deciding to focus only on the responses which were short and curt. You posted that the majority of Palestinians live most of their lives in 'relative peace' and were again perplexed when you received replies around that fact.

I actually was going to reply to you with some examples of how people I know in the West Bank live their lives and the injustices they've had to go through. But to be completely honest with you, as a poster I normally hold in self esteem, I didn't really feel that you were engaging in an honest fashion and didn't really want to learn and engage properly. You have your viewpoints, which is fine but at least be honest and upfront about them, like the truly awful German poster above is being for instance.

Please don't martyr yourself when nobody is suggesting the things that you are.

Thank you and I do appreciate and understand what you have said and accept what you say. Except that I always engage in an honest fashion. That is why I normally try to respond to people.

I have always been outspoken and only say what I genuinely believe in. And if others disagree, that is perfect fine by me.

But let me be clear. If it means I am not allowed to say what I believe in, then I will remove myself from this forum. I will not be told what to do by anyone. I am too old for that.
 
Do you see Netanyahu as a barrier to potential peace discussions.
IMO every current potential Israeli leader is a barrier, part of the problem is that every Israeli government has been a coalition and a such usually have to appease the hardliners to gain or remain in power, until that changes I can't see how any real deal on the Israeli side can happen

On the Palestinian side it's basically different terrorist or freedom fighters, (depending on your point of view) organizations, getting all of those to agree to anything would be akin to the odds of winning the Mega Millions lottery twice.

The only way I can see anything changing is if the US and the major Arab states impose a solution, probably involving a UN peacekeeping force and a viable 2 state solution, I'm not holding my breath though!
 
Barghouti has a lot of respect in the arab world and is twice the man most other arab leaders are. Which is exactly why he's being left to die in an Israeli jail.
He still is very popular among the Palestinians and has a lot influence outside despite him being in prison. He is a firm believer in the two states solution and peaceful coexistence. If Israel was to negociate long-term solution, he would be the ideal candidate, imo.
 
I have always been outspoken and only say what I genuinely believe in. And if others disagree, that is perfect fine by me.
This is what people are doing.

But let me be clear. If it means I am not allowed to say what I believe in, then I will remove myself from this forum. I will not be told what to do by anyone. I am too old for that.
Not this
 
IMO every current potential Israeli leader is a barrier, part of the problem is that every Israeli government has been a coalition and a such usually have to appease the hardliners to gain or remain in power, until that changes I can't see how any real deal on the Israeli side can happen

On the Palestinian side it's basically different terrorist or freedom fighters, (depending on your point of view) organizations, getting all of those to agree to anything would be akin to the odds of winning the Mega Millions lottery twice.

The only way I can see anything changing is if the US and the major Arab states impose a solution, probably involving a UN peacekeeping force and a viable 2 state solution, I'm not holding my breath though!

This is utopic but I don't see any road to peace without someone else than Israel taking control of palestinian territories and the international community investing heavily on incressing the quality of life for palestinian while protecting the integrity of their territory for a few decades. The only way to get rid or marginalize extremists is by turning them into a fruitless option. Only a good protectorate in the interest of Palestine while also providing better security for Israel can work.

Right now we are talking about things that are impossible and impractical. Palestinians do not trust israelis when it comes to their right and the integrity of their territory while israelis don't trust palestinians when it comes to their security while a bunch of them actively want to take more land.
 
Thank you and I do appreciate and understand what you have said and accept what you say. Except that I always engage in an honest fashion. That is why I normally try to respond to people.

I have always been outspoken and only say what I genuinely believe in. And if others disagree, that is perfect fine by me.

But let me be clear. If it means I am not allowed to say what I believe in, then I will remove myself from this forum. I will not be told what to do by anyone. I am too old for that.

But I have to say I didn't feel that the question about settler colonialism was written with good intentions at all. In the same way a lot of people on the Tate thread for instance are simply 'asking questions'.

I could have told you about my Palestinian friend who saw his 8 year old niece killed in front of him by an Israeli sniper for instance when she popped her head out of the window in her own home. Or his family friends who've been kicked out by Israeli settlers, while the IDF watch on, providing cover. Or the incredibly dehumanising process they go through to try to enter it exit their territory, controlled by the Israelis? Or the price tag attacks, where settlers have burned farms, homes of extended family. And many other incidents. These are just incidents affecting 2 friends I have there.

But I didn't say. Because I didn't feel like you really wanted to hear the above. And that's fine. But like I said, on this topic, it hasn't particularly felt like you actually want to engage on it.

Again, nobody is stopping you from saying what you believe in. That hasn't been a suggestion even once. You can even post in here that Gazans deserve what's coming to them, as that German poster did (something I'm pretty sure would get you a thread ban if you posted the same about Israelis or Americans after 9/11) and not have anyone seriously suggesting you be thread banned or removed from the forum.
 
This is utopic but I don't see any road to peace without someone else than Israel taking control of palestinian territories and the international community investing heavily on incressing the quality of life for palestinian while protecting the integrity of their territory for a few decades. The only way to get rid or marginalize extremists is by turning them into a fruitless option. Only a good protectorate in the interest of Palestine while also providing better security for Israel can work.

Right now we are talking about things that are impossible and impractical. Palestinians do not trust israelis when it comes to their right and the integrity of their territory while israelis don't trust palestinians when it comes to their security while a bunch of them actively want to take more land.
It is indeed utopic and I don't ever see it happening in my lifetime, unfortunately what is happening currently is not new, it's happened before and I have no doubt until Utopia is achieved it'll happen again
 
Having both Hamas and Netanyahu gone wouldn't be the worst thing.
The annoying thing is, I'm pretty sure there were massive demonstrations planned against Netenyahu and his smashing of the judiciary. He'll probably be canonized for leading Israel through it's next "existential war".
 
The annoying thing is, I'm pretty sure there were massive demonstrations planned against Netenyahu and his smashing of the judiciary. He'll probably be canonized for leading Israel through it's next "existential war".

Polling indicates that around 80% of Israelis blame him for the Hamas attack, including 69% of Likud voters during the last election. The same poll suggests that were an election held today the ruling coalition would drop from 64 seats to 43, while Gantz’s party alone would win 40, up from 12 -https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveb...licly-take-responsibility-for-oct-7-failures/
 
Without a doubt - he will want to cling to power, and he will have support in the short term, but as the dust settles he will lose support. Golda Meir did not survive the 73 war for example.

Her party actually won the election after the war, but eventually she resigned following protests. Those were different days, those. Netanyahu has many loyalists who won't desert him no matter what, and also has total control of his party. And he's already working on political survival.
 
Certainly a fascinating thread to watch on here. As I've said before, one of the best things about the Caf is the somewhat arbtitrary slice of humanity that it attracts. You really do get opinons from every piece of the geopolitical spectrum. Obvioulsy I'd encourage posters on both sides to not view this thread as an opportunity to 'win the internet' which the last 24 hours has kind of descended into.

There's far too much desire to reduce this to who is right and who is wrong, and then simply attack the other side. The reality of the situation is that it's a mess, it's been a mess since before any of us were born and despite the efforts of some of the most powerful, thoughtful people on Earth thinking about it, no resolution has come.

I'm not sure if I believe in the way that the current nation-state of Israel was founded, but I do believe the Jewish people are entitled to a safe place that they can retreat to in the not hugely uncommon situation that they're persecuted to death. Did it have to be where it is? If you looked at it today, obviously not, but that's when this decision was made. When it was, there were only about 700k Palestinians in the entire area - ie - plenty of room for neighbours. Now, clearly it was too much to expect everyone to play nicely, but at the time perhaps it felt more likely. Regardless.

We are where we are today. Following numerous wars and escalations, the rough borders are where they are. Since 2006, Israeli occupation of Gaza has ended, and it has become as all will tell you, a quasi open air prison. One of the worst places on Earth to have the poor fortune to be born in, and for whatever reason, there have been a lot of births there recently. It is 'governed' by a literal terrorist organiation, who treat its own citizens as little more than cannon fodder in some testosterone-fueled religious pogrom against their neighbours. And the neighbours want nothing to do with the whole place, and realistically just wish it would stop being a problem.

So. That's where we are, in September 2023. The international community has a presence there, but it only makes the news every now and then, and certainly isn't top of mind. The nearby Arab states show even less interest in helping than the West. Indeed, Iran actively de-humanises them, while also arming Hamas in the hope of just keeping the Israeli's on edge. Syria is somehow even worse. The rich gulf states are doing sweet f*ck all. Netanyahu has shown no interest in either escalating or de-escalating, favouring doing nothing while he tries to dismantle the courts that want to put him in jail, rightly. Gazans are treated terribly, but deaths are relatively low, and isolated. Again, no one is helping.

At this point, I think most of us would have nothing but sympathy with the Palestinians, but not really know what to do.

Then October 7th. And as posts at the time suggest, I was utterly horrified. Not just by the scale of the attack, but what would surely follow. The knowledge that as the death toll ticked up, it was only going to multiply back in the other direction. Children, civilians. Not the fighters. Not the cowardly Hamas actors, hiding either in Qatari palaces or behind innocent Gazans.

I categorically refuse to exonerate in any way the actions of Hamas. Their actions are not the natural strategy stemming from Israel's occupation. Their actions are the driving force betwen the estimated 33 Gazan deaths last year and the > 5,000 that will be the figure this year. Literally every person who knows about the area knew this is how Israel woudl react - we all said it 10 days ago. They are cowards, terrorists with their own agency and they chose this as a strategy. They should be hunted and brought to justice. They are the catalyst behind the people they represent dying en masse.

I also categorically refuse to accept the actions of this Israeli government are anything other than disgusting, deplorable and deserve widespread condemnation. I desperately wish that Biden had told Netanyahu that if this didn't end, the spiggot of funding stops.

Both of these things can be true.

It seems like this thread is now dominated by one viewpoint, but I hear extraordinarily few suggestions on realistic action to move forward. That's what I'd personally love to see.

I think if anything this thread has become less dominated by one viewpoint in the last 24 hours and has had an an influx of people with quite unpleasant views. Though that is probably a more accurate representation of the world.

I guess it was easier to have a more unified viewpoint in the initial parts, when the only real viewpoint was shock and horror at what Hamas had done.

You hear very few points of view on how to move forwards because there are essentially none. The viewpoints are so disparate. It was obviously a horrendous attack. There is no argument. The generational trauma of the Holocaust is understandably baked into the Jewish psyche.

Yet I've found it interesting that many Israelis are couching this as a battle for their very survival. Despite being the regional superpower, matched perhaps only by Turkey, with complete air superiority and nuclear weapons, they still feel an existential threat against a para military organisation who are about to be crushed into the ground, along with many thousands of civilians, undoubtedly fomenting the conditions for the next paramilitary organisation.

They are a militarily dominant power, with military and moral backing from the world's only superpower, as well as most European countries. The Arab states provide no military threat anyway and the days of moves like the oil producing countries turning off the oil tap to the West for their support of Israel are long gone.

So what incentives do Israelis have? The solution I see is total Israeli victory, whenever that may be. Why would they care?
 
But I have to say I didn't feel that the question about settler colonialism was written with good intentions at all. In the same way a lot of people on the Tate thread for instance are simply 'asking questions'.

I could have told you about my Palestinian friend who saw his 8 year old niece killed in front of him by an Israeli sniper for instance when she popped her head out of the window in her own home. Or his family friends who've been kicked out by Israeli settlers, while the IDF watch on, providing cover. Or the incredibly dehumanising process they go through to try to enter it exit their territory, controlled by the Israelis? Or the price tag attacks, where settlers have burned farms, homes of extended family. And many other incidents. These are just incidents affecting 2 friends I have there.

But I didn't say. Because I didn't feel like you really wanted to hear the above. And that's fine. But like I said, on this topic, it hasn't particularly felt like you actually want to engage on it.

Again, nobody is stopping you from saying what you believe in. That hasn't been a suggestion even once. You can even post in here that Gazans deserve what's coming to them, as that German poster did (something I'm pretty sure would get you a thread ban if you posted the same about Israelis or Americans after 9/11) and not have anyone seriously suggesting you be thread banned or removed from the forum.

Again, thank you this. And what you have said about what happened to your friends in Palestine is quite terrible. As was what was done on 7th October. Inexcusable by both parties.
I am still at odds regarding me not wanting to hear.
Honestly mate, that could not be further from the truth. I genuinely am interested. And regarding engagement, my post history will show that I normally respond, as in this case.

As others have said, if we only get posts from the same viewpoint, this and other threads will become sterile and meaningless.
 
You raised a very good point concerning the PA. That's really a problem. What do you think of Marwan Barghouti? Serious question.

Barghouti has a lot of respect in the arab world and is twice the man most other arab leaders are. Which is exactly why he's being left to die in an Israeli jail.

It would take a very couragous Israeli leader to release Barghouti and turn him into a possible partner, and there's no one like that around.

I do understand that, looking at Barghouti's history. We've already tried a peace deal with a "reformed" terrorist.
 
Polling indicates that around 80% of Israelis blame him for the Hamas attack, including 69% of Likud voters during the last election. The same poll suggests that were an election held today the ruling coalition would drop from 64 seats to 43, while Gantz’s party alone would win 40, up from 12 -https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveb...licly-take-responsibility-for-oct-7-failures/

Yes. My relatives in Israel say the same thing and are extremely unhappy that the attack on 7th was not prepared for and prevented.
 
The annoying thing is, I'm pretty sure there were massive demonstrations planned against Netenyahu and his smashing of the judiciary. He'll probably be canonized for leading Israel through it's next "existential war".
He's finished.

The Israelis hold him responsible for what happened will never forgive him.
 
History is always cherry picked, it's written by the winners and half the time it's complete bollocks!

A couple of pints would go down well but I'm "working" right now!


I've had mine.

Regarding historiography, it's not a problem if you are aware of who wrote it.

That's a bit of a tired cliché too, and while it applies brilliantly to the Vikings who attacked the Arabs and the Irish, both great tellers of tales and excellent scribes while the Vikings had an oral tradition, the history of the region in question is quite clear. The facts are not debated as much as ignored.
 
Israeli PMs have a history of crashing and burning quite badly, one way or another.

Problem is, they were all leaders of their parties. Netanyahu has a cult.

Yeah, if we had an election today he's lose, but we don't. And you can be certain he's working behind the scenes to put the blame on others and regain support. Even his less than staunch supporters have a tendency to revert back and vote for him eventually. I don't know if there's anything that can change that.
 
I've had mine.

Regarding historiography, it's not a problem if you are aware of who wrote it.

That's a bit of a tired cliché too, and while it applies brilliantly to the Vikings who attacked the Arabs and the Irish, both great tellers of tales and excellent scribes while the Vikings had an oral tradition, the history of the region in question is quite clear. The facts are not debated.

It often works the other way around for the American Civil War too, and even for some time and in some ways World War 2. The surviving Nazi generals basically all either wrote their memoirs and attributed all their mistakes to Hitler, or they became advisors/analysts for NATO countries and perpetuated myths about the Soviet Union's fighting capabilities (i. e. their cruel human wave attacks against our heroic professionalism). It actually caused some issues for the US armed forces, who were learning the wrong lessons about their new enemy.
 
It often works the other way around for the American Civil War too, and even for some time and in some ways World War 2. The surviving Nazi generals basically all either wrote their memoirs and attributed all their mistakes to Hitler, or they became advisors/analysts for NATO countries and perpetuated myths about the Soviet Union's fighting capabilities (i. e. their cruel human wave attacks against our heroic professionalism). It actually caused some issues for the US armed forces, who were learning the wrong lessons about their new enemy.

Yes, once you know who wrote it, why they wrote it, and who paid for the ink, you're usually ok.
 
Polling indicates that around 80% of Israelis blame him for the Hamas attack, including 69% of Likud voters during the last election. The same poll suggests that were an election held today the ruling coalition would drop from 64 seats to 43, while Gantz’s party alone would win 40, up from 12 -https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveb...licly-take-responsibility-for-oct-7-failures/
Oh yes, I don't doubt they blame him and he's at an all time low. I just think because of the unity government and the war cabinet, hell get time he doesn't deserve.
 
Problem is, they were all leaders of their parties. Netanyahu has a cult.

Yeah, if we had an election today he's lose, but we don't. And you can be certain he's working behind the scenes to put the blame on others and regain support. Even his less than staunch supporters have a tendency to revert back and vote for him eventually. I don't know if there's anything that can change that.
My sense is that you can’t bet on him losing. I wouldn’t.

Besides, he could lose an election in the Spring (if it takes place). However, elections in Israel happen too frequently these days, which means he could win the one after that. He’s always capable of winning.
 
My sense is that you can’t bet on him losing. I wouldn’t.

Besides, he could lose an election in the Spring (if it takes place). However, elections in Israel happen too frequently these days, which means he could win the one after that. He’s always capable of winning.

Yep, and that's the thing - He'll never step away voluntarily, and he'll never be ousted by his party. So even if he loses, he'll try again, shamelessly.
 


This came out a few hours ago.

Between this and the Al Jazeera investigation from yesterday, I think it is fair to say that the people who were scolding everyone for jumping to conclusions too quickly also jumped to conclusions too quickly and acted like this was a settled matter.
 
After all the mass protests we have seen in front of Western and Israeli embassies/consulates, I have the following question: why has the same not been dished against Egyptian equivalents worldwide? As far as I look at the current situation with the very slow delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza, Egypt are on another level of being utter cnuts here.
 
After all the mass protests we have seen in front of Western and Israeli embassies/consulates, I have the following question: why has the same not been dished against Egyptian equivalents worldwide? As far as I look at the current situation with the very slow delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza, Egypt are on another level of being utter cnuts here.
1. There's an march outside the Egyptian embassy tmrw, by the headbangers from HT.

2. It's israel that bombed the crossing several times and have threatened do destroy anything come through there without their consent.

3. The ruler is a despot supported by the west.
 
After all the mass protests we have seen in front of Western and Israeli embassies/consulates, I have the following question: why has the same not been dished against Egyptian equivalents worldwide? As far as I look at the current situation with the very slow delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza, Egypt are on another level of being utter cnuts here.

I wasn't aware Egypt is bombing civilians in Gaza :wenger:
 
It's true that there's a massive looming issue that lies entirely with Palestinians in possibly resolving this conflict to some sort of actual modus vivendi : Right to return will never be fulfilled, even if Israel concedes huge rollbacks of territory or in a one state solution. Israel is an unofficial nuclear power, that state is never being thrown into the sea even in the wildest fantasies of Islamists and hardliners.

I understand it is really hard for whoever is negotiating for Palestine to accept a compromise on that, both because it would maybe doom their domestic political capital that allow them to negotiate in the first place, and it might be the only card in the deck they have. Plus Israel is enacting policies that are obviously provocative (settlements to name one). Not to mention the emotional scarring to officially letting go of that for many Palestinian families.

All the steps to possibly get there are probably contingent on Israel however.

I think a couple people were confused at the motive of the Hamas attack but for as horrible as it sounds, I think there's obvious "rational" ends to carry a spectacular raid into Israel. It is a strong message that despite material & military superiority, conscription, the border fence and Iron Dome (that Israeli governments made such a big deal of) and the tight grip they keep, Israeli authorities cannot stop thousands of their citizens being killed if Hamas really wishes so. The only way to sap the will of Israeli citizens of keeping current policies on track is to convince them that all the coercive military pressure on Palestine is an exercice in futility and that the solution is probably to keep rattling the cage.
Also pushed back the whole thing to worldwide headlines.

That's not to condone Hamas and all the crimes they are alleged to have committed, but it does make some sense (beyond the extremist ideology). It's either that or slowly losing in darkness while Israel keeps chirping away.