I say this, obviously, in light of the reaction to
Monday’s post on Israel and Palestine. (I really don’t want this to become a forum on Israel and Palestine, and I’m tempted to turn off comments again, but I won’t.) A position on this issue was much requested, and at some point not saying something amounts to saying something, so I wrote a piece.
And I said the same thing I’ve always said: basic liberal democratic principles require that the land historically referred to as Palestine has to be the site of peace and prosperity for every kind of person who lives there, an egalitarian and multi-ethnic state with equal political and legal rights for all. I also pointed out that Israel enjoys hegemonic military power over the region and that every meaningful institutional actor in the United States is aligned with the Israeli government.
See Joe Biden’s comments thus far, which express limitless support for Israel and then, in the barest and weakest terms possible, urges caution or restraint in entirely vague terms, barely able to mention the existence of the Palestinians.
That imbalance of influence has everything to do with our apprehension of this conflict. That does not strike me as radical position. But even if it did, that would seem to fit comfortably into the dimensions of what so many readers have told me that they value, my independence. Yet it appears Israel is not an ox I can gore. Is that independence?