So far we’ve seen an audio excerpt that’s been intercepted and a couple of online Twitter threads. The audio excerpt seems especially odd seeing as the Israelis had no idea what was happening on a much larger scale a week or so ago.
The Twitter threads may be credible to you but I’m waiting to see what transpires.
On the other side - we have people who were in the building say that the hospital was warned a few days ago, we have evidence that it had warning strikes/bombs from a few days prior. We have the Israeli minister claim the attack the delete the post. We have the IDF edit their post from ‘it’s us’ to ‘it’s someone else’. And then we of course have their pattern of behaviour over a prolonged period of time.
Again with the beheaded babies - you need to let it go.
With the beheaded babies claim, I knew it lacked credibility from fairly early on as all news outlets were pointing to one journalist. You’d think that it would have been shared with other journalists on the scene if it was the case, or shared by the IDF themselves given the shocking nature of it. Similarly the rape claims all came from a single US based online tabloid magazine which didn’t divulge anything specific in terms of sources and spoke about it in generalities. All news sources went with it that tabloid mag. And again, it was quickly found to be untrue.
The hospital issue is a bit more murky, I have my viewpoint which I’ve shared, but it’s certainly not as easy to disprove (yet) as the beheaded babies claim.