Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

I'd say one should Learn from history. Pacifist movements comtrary to popular belief have toppled empires, colonial rule, to dictators up to apartheid S.A. If Israeli's occupation was ever faced with a totally pacifist movement and dared continue the underhand schemes of the current right wing clique Netanyahu they'd have no where to hide and they'd lose all their allies. Without exception. No to mention face a straight up mutiny within their own borders. Right now they can hide behind the animosity of the likes of Hamas to justify the international law they break, keeping any oppostion to it in their own borders quiet thanks to the common threat faced by the excuse the evil that is Hamas provides.

It’s all notional, as with a population of over 5 million there will always be a group somewhere in Palestine who want a religious war. But even if there was somehow a completely pacifist Palestine for a period of time there would be no guarantee it would continue.
 
I'd say one should Learn from history. Pacifist movements comtrary to popular belief have toppled empires, colonial rule, to dictators up to apartheid S.A.

1. Vast majority of pacifist movements have been ignored or crushed

2. Apartheid SA was not toppled by a pacifist movement (the ANC would consider that an insult)

3. Stop expecting the oppressed to be 100% perfect before being liberated
 
It’s all notional, as with a population of over 5 million there will always be a group somewhere in Palestine who want a religious war. But even if there was somehow a completely pacifist Palestine for a period of time there would be no guarantee it would continue.

It's a bullshit premise. Exhibit A: the West fecking Bank
 
He wouldn't have seen it in his time really; I don't think enemy to alliances often cross boundaries like that generationally. I could be talking out my arse and would love to read a paper on this if you know of one.

My hypothesis would be that it generally requires a general generational change of guard in the population before things shift. (ie. it took until 1963 for the first real declaration between Grance and West Germany, even with the 'scourge of communism' on the other side') - Though I may be shooting myself in the foot here as De Gaulle had served in both the 1st and 2nd world wars.

Friends may be strong in fairness but within 6 years they'd set up the ECSC. So if he lived to 86 then I guess. I'm not talking genuine love but to go from killing millions of each others citizens to forming a supra national trading organisation....within one person's lifetime....is pretty amazing.

My point is that the middle east isn't this unique place with these mystical people who go through issues the rest of humanity have never been through. They're people who fight. They're people who hate. Who love. Who kill. There's no way that people in Europe thought in 1941.....France and Germany are going to be in a supra national organisation.
 
I'd say one should Learn from history. Pacifist movements comtrary to popular belief have toppled empires, colonial rule, to dictators up to apartheid S.A. If Israeli's occupation was ever faced with a totally pacifist movement and dared continue the underhand schemes of the current right wing clique Netanyahu they'd have no where to hide and they'd lose all their allies. Without exception. No to mention face a straight up mutiny within their own borders. Right now they can hide behind the animosity of the likes of Hamas to justify the international law they break, keeping any oppostion to it in their own borders quiet thanks to the common threat faced by the excuse the evil that is Hamas provides.

If you made a list of all the overthrown dictators you could think of, eg in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa, how many could you honestly say have been overthrown peacefully? I'd like you to be right I'm really struggling to think of any.
 
Ah yep, they found peace because the good and advanced peoples of Europe decided enough was enough. Not because Germany suffered total defeat. Not because Germany was occupied, it's institutions stripped, it's military defanged and American money pumped in over decades.

The millions who died in the two preceding wars. Tolerable. WW2 was the final straw.

Yes? Why the sarcasm? It takes (at least) two sides to make peace. I'm sure you understand that? It wasn't just about the Germany. The the victorious countries decided not to entertain desires for revenge, but a mindset of quick integration on eye level instead of occupation and so the cycle was broken and the precursor of the EU was founded just 6 years after the war.
 
It's a bullshit premise. Exhibit A: the West fecking Bank

Yep, it's a classic negotiating tactic. Asking for a completely unachievable set of conditions, in full knowledge that it will never happen, so any commitments you make based on it are moot.
 
Using religion as the root cause is just a way to dehumanise the Palestinians as fanatic zealots that love death and love dying. It's incredibly lazy and borderline xenophobic. Muslims are no different to anyone and are some of the most loving people I know.

The root cause is one side wants a secure Israel and will never legitimise a rival state in the so called 2 state solution. The root cause is the other side is stuck in an open air prison where food water and power can be shut off at any moment, and no freedom to leave; on the west bank side it's all the evictions and settlements and killings of Palestinians.

I'm sure in Christianity martyrdom is offered with some form of reward. In the 30 years war central Europe bent itself backwards over religion with Protestants and Catholics fighting one another - in some parts of Germany 50% of the population died. What changed? Eventually people realised that religion and division would only bring more destruction, and they'd had enough of suffering.
 
Who dis & does it matter?


Just another far right crackpot. Doesn't mean anything, doesn't matter.

In May 2022, Galit Distel-Atbaryan claimed in an interview that “there is no such thing as autism”, and shared how she “treated” her autistic son, by refusing him food and water until he talked. The comments caused a stir and led to criticism from autistic people and their families.
 
Just another far right crackpot. Doesn't mean anything, doesn't matter.

In May 2022, Galit Distel-Atbaryan claimed in an interview that “there is no such thing as autism”, and shared how she “treated” her autistic son, by refusing him food and water until he talked. The comments caused a stir and led to criticism from autistic people and their families.
feck her then.
 
This is what it was founded on:
"The coming together of the nations of Europe requires the elimination of the age-old opposition of France and Germany. Any action taken must in the first place concern these two countries."

"On 11 August 1952, the United States was the first non-ECSC member to recognise the Community and stated it would now deal with the ECSC on coal and steel matters, establishing its delegation in Brussels. Monnet responded by choosing Washington, D.C. as the site of the ECSC's first external presence. The headline of the delegation's first bulletin read "Towards a Federal Government of Europe". "

I don't know what more you can expect of these people, 6 years after a world war, 2 years after (West) Germany even became a sovereign country. Trust and friendship are built and they skipped a lot of steps on that way.

I wasn’t knocking it, they did well! Just thought the “time they became friends” was the Elyse treaty. I did warn at the start I’m probably talking out my arse on the topic!
 
Nothing wrong with what Brady said. Hamas are fecking morons regardless of what their goals are.
 
There's a reason why the replies are turned off on virtually all media pieces on Israel and in fact Jews over the last few years. The stream of hatred is inevitable.
No doubt, but I would have enjoyed the mental gymnastics.
 
Would be shocked if bibi wasn’t done for after this mess is over. Think he knows it too.
I think so too mate. Going by the reaction of Israeli people to some ministers. Bibi is shielded at the moment but his time will come.
 
Would be shocked if bibi wasn’t done for after this mess is over. Think he knows it too.
Any way he greased the skids of this current conflagration a la the perceived Clinton bombing his way out of second term trouble?
 
Any way he greased the skids of this current conflagration a la the perceived Clinton bombing his way out of second term trouble?

Doubt it. Think he just knows he’s done and is doing the maximalist brutal invasion to achieve his aim of dominating the Palestinians in the knowledge he could be going to jail anyway. Bibi absolutely does not care about Palestinia lives and I can say that hand on heart and feel no shame. It’s 100% true.
 
Would be shocked if bibi wasn’t done for after this mess is over. Think he knows it too.
My worry is that he's going to go way too far and too brutal in a desperate attempt to rescue his reputation as a 'war leader'.
 
You know, I was thinking, that's enough bombing of Gaza now. However, if it was your baby, your wife, your grandparents who had been kidnapped. Would you be saying, that's enough bombing now?

I really don't know what the answer is. They need to get rid of Hammas, but at what cost to civilian life?
 
Would be shocked if bibi wasn’t done for after this mess is over. Think he knows it too.

Don't think I've ever felt more anger at a public figure than I am at this guy right now.
 
Yes? Why the sarcasm? It takes (at least) two sides to make peace. I'm sure you understand that? It wasn't just about the Germany. The the victorious countries decided not to entertain desires for revenge, but a mindset of quick integration on eye level instead of occupation and so the cycle was broken and the precursor of the EU was founded just 6 years after the war.

Because it warrants sarcasm to be honest. Germany did not decide to just move on, they were utterly destroyed. France did not just decide to move on but was brought along with the USA and the UK, who were not as aggressive post WW1 either. They were also mindful of the threat of the Soviet Union, particularly the USA and keen to create a German bulwark against them.

The equivalent here is the USA, Israel and Egypt invading Gaza, entirely defeating Hamas and then occupying the strip for decades and pumping in literally billions to rebuild the area.

It wasn't because the Europeans were so enlightened. They had after all been involving themselves (and the world as a whole) in increasingly destructive wars, killing tens of millions.
 
I think so too mate. Going by the reaction of Israeli people to some ministers. Bibi is shielded at the moment but his time will come.

He is absolute poison. Whatever the first step is in restarting some kind of peace process in the years ahead, it absolutely needs to not involve him.
 
Does anyone have any ideas on how Israel can deal with the Hamas problem without the cost of thousands of Palestinian lives?

An enemy who have no interest in peace, in co-existence. One who can neither be ignored or pandered to as it has only one goal, your complete and total destruction.

A lot of justified criticism and condemnation is laid at Israel but you never hear of any realistic alternative approach to the Hamas problem..

Myself and one or two others have suggested, perhaps naively, that a Palestinian uprising against Hamas might be one of the ways this current chapter of the never ending conflict ends. Taking away Hamas' cover would expose them in the open allowing the Israelis to pick them off with less innocent lives lost, at least in theory.

Out of interest do we have any figures on the number of Palestinians killed by Hamas over the years? I imagine non cooperation carries a heavy price and that fear is Hamas' biggest weapon against the people of Gaza.
 
You know, I was thinking, that's enough bombing of Gaza now. However, if it was your baby, your wife, your grandparents who had been kidnapped. Would you be saying, that's enough bombing now?

I really don't know what the answer is. They need to get rid of Hammas, but at what cost to civilian life?
‘You know, I was thinking, that’s enough bombing towards Israel now. However if it was your baby, your wife, your grandparents who had been killed. Would you be saying, that’s enough bombing now?

I really don’t know what the answer is. They need to get rid of the govt, but at what cost to civilian life?’
 
@do.ob

What point are you making? You condemn Hamas attacking because of their religion but Israelis would happily die and kill in the name of Judaism and Zionism. They've regularly massacred Palestinians, only it doesn't receive media attention so people are outraged.

Pinning the actions of one side as 'their religion' is incredibly lazy. It sets out to make them different to other humans and thus justifiable to slaughter the shit out of. That's all.

My point is that you start the post with claiming that pointing out religion as the root cause is a tactic to dehumanize and then you end it with claiming people realized that religion would only bring destruction.

And Hamas are a terror organization with the explicit goal to establish an Islamist state, are they not? So how are they not driven by religion?

I'm sure religion is a factor for Israel, too and I don't think I said anything to the contrary.
 
‘You know, I was thinking, that’s enough bombing towards Israel now. However if it was your baby, your wife, your grandparents who had been killed. Would you be saying, that’s enough bombing now?

I really don’t know what the answer is. They need to get rid of the govt, but at what cost to civilian life?’

:lol:

Like the late and great Michael Brooks said, this is not a complicated issue

Edit: feck it, let me post the video



It's not complicated. It's not rocket science. It's not hard. This is real simple.
 
Any way he greased the skids of this current conflagration a la the perceived Clinton bombing his way out of second term trouble?

Nah. He's being blamed for this. Something like 60 IDF soldiers in total, including off-duty ones, on the border with Gaza (and their circa 30k Hamas militants) last weekend is a critical failure from a guy who promised security above all else. I think he's done for.
 
You know, I was thinking, that's enough bombing of Gaza now. However, if it was your baby, your wife, your grandparents who had been kidnapped. Would you be saying, that's enough bombing now?

I really don't know what the answer is. They need to get rid of Hammas, but at what cost to civilian life?

Not sure I'd be thinking that an indiscriminate bombing campaign was the best way of freeing them no.