VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,516
UN said:An update now from the United Nations agency that works with Palestinian refugees:
- More than 187,000 people have been displaced across the Gaza Strip - and the number is expected to increase
- There are 137,500 sheltering in 83 UN schools
- The UNRWA field office in Gaza has "suffered collateral damage due to airstrikes"
- Almost half a million people in Gaza have not been able to get UN food rations this week as distribution centres have been closed
You could ask the same for/about the Gazans. What should they have done? We hate what's happened but when they have no other means of fighting back and are kept in a dungeon, there obviously has to be a proportionate military response, how should Hamas minimise human suffering?
See how quickly that falls apart? No one countenances the legitimacy of it for a second but what difference? Palestinian civilians, also, slaughtered, raped, and abducted (just more regularly).
No, it's apt, because both Hamas and the IDF routinely kill civillians. Only we pretend that one doesn't when everyone knows it does.That's a fairly stupid comment. They could try attacking military targets instead of hunting down civilians? There are plenty of them and they are well separated from the civilian population.
Civilians on both sides are innocent in this but there is no world where Hamas are not fully responsible for what happened this weekend and the retaliation they will provoke.
Yeah, an ethnic group living somewhere literal thousands of years ago is equivalent to another group presently living there. I must find out where my ancestors from 300 years ago lived and see if the current owners are amenable to me moving in.The meaning of countries as we know today started shortly before the first ww, I wouldn't use it as an argument for or against. Both people have claim to that land, both people lived there for thousands of years. Hell, the name Palestinian Syria was given by the Romans after they've crushed Judea's rebelion. The problem is both have claim to it, but can't live with each other.
Yeh. Sadly it’s the first thing I thought about when the festival attack happened. That Israel are going to go all out now. They have their excuse.They are going to wipe off a big chunk of Gazas population in the name of terrorists and annex Gaza Strip. Aren’t they?
I definitely meant to quote you. Doesn’t mean I haven’t cocked something up in my understanding though!I think you've very badly misunderstood what my view is or quoted the wrong post?
My reasoning is circular, as is yours of course. And so we spiral into hell.
And what do you specifically mean by a "big chunk of Gazas population"?They are going to wipe off a big chunk of Gazas population in the name of terrorists and annex Gaza Strip. Aren’t they?
the world will watch and back them while they commit genocide.They are going to wipe off a big chunk of Gazas population in the name of terrorists and annex Gaza Strip. Aren’t they?
Might be hundreds of thousands. I don’t know. I’m dreading it. Civilians have no where to go and they gonna bombard Gaza into oblivion.And what do you specifically mean by a "big chunk of Gazas population"?
No they don’t. The Jewish control of the land ended around 1,000 years before 1947.
You (and others) seem to excuse Hamas' action as a simple extrapolation of the situation, but I really feels this removes the agency of these individuals. They CHOSE to perform the actions of the past week. Persumably, somewhat unilaterally, without it necessarily being the action that the vast majority of Gazans would have wanted.You could ask the same for/about the Gazans. What should they have done? We hate what's happened but when they have no other means of fighting back and are kept in a dungeon, there obviously has to be a proportionate military response, how should Hamas minimise human suffering?
See how quickly that falls apart? No one countenances the legitimacy of it for a second but what difference? Palestinian civilians, also, slaughtered, raped, and abducted (just more regularly).
That says more about you than you perhaps realise.Yeh. Sadly it’s the first thing I thought about when the festival attack happened. That Israel are going to go all out now. They have their excuse.
No it didn't. The land allocated to them was only a fraction of what it is now. Have a look at the 1947 map and compare it to now and voila there is the whole problem.Yes and it started again in 1947, because they moved back to the lands of their ancestors after being hunted in Europe, so how does that negate the fact that both people lived there for thousands of years? Or do you simply pick that part of history that suits you like Russia does with Ukraine?
Makes me physically sick that even in this day and age there’s no accountability and how easy it is to create a propaganda to wipe out an entire populace. Rule of law and Modern times my arse. There was more hope of getting justice in the Jurassic period.the world will watch and back them while they commit genocide.
1.7million refugees live in the gaza strip.
As a species is there anything we wont destroy?
“Well sir, it all started when he hit me back!”I don't think what Israel did before the attack was okay. What they have been doing since however is how I would expect most countries to react.
An assumption that may not be true - evidenced 1) by Netenyahu’s map at the UN a few weeks ago, and 2) the fact that a key reason they haven’t done this is likely (not confirmed, my opinion) due to being tempered by the international community.You (and others) seem to excuse Hamas' action as a simple extrapolation of the situation, but I really feels this removes the agency of these individuals. They CHOSE to perform the actions of the past week. Persumably, somewhat unilaterally, without it necessarily being the action that the vast majority of Gazans would have wanted.
For me this is simply false. There are always alternatives to any action. Hamas has no interest in a better two-state solution. Its actions this week demonstrate it has no interest in a better life for those it claims to represent.
Israel's treatment of the Palestinians is obviously, clearly and demonstrably abhorrent. But if Israel had similar beliefs to Hamas, there would no longer be a Gaza.
Realistically, due to more failings than can be articulated by more powers and figures of history than can be listed, we've arrived at point where the two-state solution seems simply unrealistic. So for me, a more dramatic solution is needed. And the most logical to me, from way over here in the West, would be for the relatively small number of Palestinians to be offered a place in more stable, wealthier arab countries where they can lead a better life than they currently have. I know that's unfair, I know its their land, I know quite a lot about the history of the region. But you can't change those things, you can only move forward imo.
Given how well the world adjusted to the Syrian refugees, I kind of doubt it'll happen though.
It has no relevance. Palestinians living there had been there for 1,000 years. Why should their land be taken away for them for Europe's antisemitism? You're speaking some right nonsense.Yes and it started again in 1947, because they moved back to the lands of their ancestors after being hunted in Europe, so how does that negate the fact that both people lived there for thousands of years? Or do you simply pick that part of history that suits you like Russia does with Ukraine?
No it didn't. The land allocated to them was only a fraction of what it is now. Have a look at the 1947 map and compare it to now and voila there is the whole problem.
Israel informed Egypt that it would bomb any trucks carrying aid to Gaza.
Israel informed Egypt that it would bomb any trucks carrying aid to Gaza.
What war did they start when their land was taken away from them? Are Palestinians backed by a superpower in the same way Israel has significant US and European backing?If you start numerous wars and lose them, you can't complain about losing land. It's humanity's history.
Then I misunderstood your interpretation. My apologies, once again.I was simply mentioning a people who have about a similar population who have been subjected to genocide, torture, oppression and being thrown into chinese prison camps and have had their country annexed while the world watched and did nothing. It was more about finding someone who could be in some way compared to the people of palestine and responding with the terror tactics havnt been on the table. But apart from that i guess the situation perhaps in many ways cant be compared. When it comes to Israel and Palestine I have no fecking realistic idea about should be done.
Israel informed Egypt that it would bomb any trucks carrying aid to Gaza.
Might be hundreds of thousands. I don’t know. I’m dreading it. Civilians have no where to go and they gonna bombard Gaza into oblivion.
It has no relevance. Palestinians living there had been there for 1,000 years. Why should their land be taken away for them for Europe's antisemitism? You're speaking some right nonsense.
Why not go further back when the land was known as Canaan and inhabited by Egyptians - shouldn't the land be theirs using your illogic logic.
Only if every establishment isn't in your pocket.Isn’t that a war crime?
Yeah but when your defense minister says this:Isn’t that a war crime?
Try challenging it. Or are we going to have to hear how Al Husseini influenced Hitler from yourself again.Best not to spout your own nonsense when arguing with others about theirs.
Some people don’t want to say it aloud but are trying their hardest to justify the massacre that is happening and about to happen.It has no relevance. Palestinians living there had been there for 1,000 years. Why should their land be taken away for them for Europe's antisemitism? You're speaking some right nonsense.
Why not go further back when the land was known as Canaan and inhabited by Egyptians - shouldn't the land be theirs using your illogic logic.
It has no relevance. Palestinians living there had been there for 1,000 years. Why should their land be taken away for them for Europe's antisemitism? You're speaking some right nonsense.
Why not go further back when the land was known as Canaan and inhabited by Egyptians - shouldn't the land be theirs using your illogic logic.
Try challenging it. Or are we going to have to hear how Al Husseini influenced Hitler from yourself again.
Some people don’t want to say it aloud but are trying their hardest to justify the massacre that is happening and about to happen.
I know there's a long history between Israel and Palestine, but my clueless wife asked me to tell her what it is in no more than 7 words.
I failed. Could you do it?