Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

https://asiapacificreport.nz/2021/0...i-banks-for-funding-settlements-in-palestine/

The multi-billion-dollar NZ Super Fund – New Zealand’s state pension fund – has finally divested from five of Israel’s biggest banks due to their funding of illegal settlement construction in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

New Zealand Green Party MP Golriz Ghahraman said the party welcomed the decision, telling The Spinoff:

“OUR NATION’S VALUES AND LEGAL OBLIGATIONS HAVE BEEN LONG IN BREACH BY INVESTMENTS FACILITATING WHAT THE UNITED NATIONS HAS CONSISTENTLY CALLED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPATION, CAUSING THE SUFFERING OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE, AND LEADING TO A NUMBER OF OTHER BREACHES OF HUMANITARIAN LAW.”
 
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/05/israel-palestine-coverage-bias-reporters.html







I won't copy all of it, but some really interesting bits here.

@VorZakone - you will find this interesting (as you found the hasbara one interesting).

There's a clear initiative by the Zionists to control the narrative portrayed in wider media.
None of that surprises me unfortunately. The disproportionate influence of the pro-Israel lobby on the Western media is unfortunately an endemic characteristic of the latter and is something that is deeply insidious. As far as I'm aware, no other country needs a political lobby to the extent that Israel has, and yet even when the mildest of criticism is levelled against them (and I'm talking the sort of play by the numbers impartiality of the BBC), they bristle with indignation.
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/57111293

A video does not show a 'fake funeral' in Gaza

A viral video reportedly from Jordan is being passed off as a 'fake funeral' in Gaza

Some Israeli social media influencers shared a video claiming it showed Palestinians faking a funeral ceremony for an individual supposedly killed by Israeli air strikes in Gaza - in order to attract global sympathy.

In the video, which was also shared by an adviser to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, a group of teenagers carry what looks like a body covered with a shroud on their shoulders.

As soon as they hear the sound of sirens, they leave the body on the ground and run off. Left alone, the supposed body also gets up and runs away.

We found the same video posted in March 2020, with reports at the time suggesting that it showed a group of boys in Jordan trying to avoid strict Covid-19 restrictions by pretending to hold a funeral.

The clip was shared under the hashtag "Palywood" [Palestinian Hollywood] hundreds of times by pro-Israeli users on major social media platforms.
Wait, Israelis are using dishonest means to influence public opinion? I’m shocked, SHOCKED!
 
None of that surprises me unfortunately. The disproportionate influence of the pro-Israel lobby on the Western media is unfortunately an endemic characteristic of the latter and is something that is deeply insidious. As far as I'm aware, no other country needs a political lobby to the extent that Israel has, and yet even when the mildest of criticism is levelled against them (and I'm talking the sort of play by the numbers impartiality of the BBC), they bristle with indignation.
Yup, I mean it's a pretty obvious truth now to be honest. The issue is highlighting this, you get the 'antisemitism' card thrown at you.
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/57111293

A video does not show a 'fake funeral' in Gaza

A viral video reportedly from Jordan is being passed off as a 'fake funeral' in Gaza

Some Israeli social media influencers shared a video claiming it showed Palestinians faking a funeral ceremony for an individual supposedly killed by Israeli air strikes in Gaza - in order to attract global sympathy.

In the video, which was also shared by an adviser to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, a group of teenagers carry what looks like a body covered with a shroud on their shoulders.

As soon as they hear the sound of sirens, they leave the body on the ground and run off. Left alone, the supposed body also gets up and runs away.

We found the same video posted in March 2020, with reports at the time suggesting that it showed a group of boys in Jordan trying to avoid strict Covid-19 restrictions by pretending to hold a funeral.

The clip was shared under the hashtag "Palywood" [Palestinian Hollywood] hundreds of times by pro-Israeli users on major social media platforms.

556f34c30423bdc0498b4567.jpeg


Pallywood.001.png


There's dozens of these online.

Again, for the record. I personally believe that 100% there are casualties, that there are attacks on palestinians, but in terms of pallywood, yes, they exist. And I personally don't blame a bit of propaganda here and there, but let's not pretend they don't exist.
 
556f34c30423bdc0498b4567.jpeg


Pallywood.001.png


There's dozens of these online.

Again, for the record. I personally believe that 100% there are casualties, that there are attacks on palestinians, but in terms of pallywood, yes, they exist. And I personally don't blame a bit of propaganda here and there, but let's not pretend they don't exist.
Pallywood is Israeli led propaganda. Do you have anything more objective that can be used as evidence of the above?
 
@esmufc07 @Frosty thought I’d tackle a few more of these....



Nasser wasn’t really looking for war, events in the months before June 1967 got out of his control, to the point where he couldn’t pull back without damaging his standing in the Arab world. Nasser had been the major Arab figure in the confrontation with Israel since the Suez War (1956) and had something of a heroic status. However Egypt had been involved in a long and bloody stalemate in the Yemen Civil War (started 1962), leaving Nasser’s prestige looking vulnerable.

A coup in Syria in 1966 brought a radical faction of the Ba’th Party into power, and they were very close to Moscow. Tit-for-tat exchanges with Israel on the Golan/Galilee frontier escalated, raising the prospect of a Syria-Israel War. This was also linked to an issue over control of the sources of the Jordan River. Egypt and Syria signed a mutual defense agreement in 1966.

Palestinian militants backed by Syria began launching attacks from the Jordanian-occupied West Bank, leading to Israeli reprisals which further escalated tensions. Then, in May 1967, Soviet intelligence advised Cairo that Israel was gathering forces in the Gallilee in preparation for an invasion of Syria. This appears to have been false information, and historians are divided over Moscow’s intent. In any case, Nasser felt forced to act, as Jordanian and Syria regime outlets began accusing him of sitting back while Israel prepared to strike. So he ejected the UN troops in the Sinai who had acted as a buffer since the Suez War and closed the Straits of Titan to Israeli shipping (something Jerusalem had explicitly warned would be considered an act of war).

Arab war rhetoric was the usual medieval, genocidal stuff. However the Israelis appear to have been confident of victory, although some point to Yitzhak Rabin having a nervous breakdown in the weeks beforehand as evidence that they were more anxious than their subsequent victory might have suggested. There is some debate over whether or not it was a war of choice for Israel - did they fully understand that Nasser was not seeking war? And if so, why not resolve matters through diplomacy? In any case they struck first and ultimately conquered the Sinai, Gaza, East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights.



So he has his basic facts wrong here - Israel had occupied Sinai, Gaza, and the West Bank in the previous war. And this was not a war to “murder the Jews” - its aims were rather limited, as Sadat wanted a moral victory he could use to bolster his prestige at home before entering peace talks with Jerusalem. Assad’s goal was to recover the Golan. After initial surprise and set-backs, Israel ultimately hit back to force a stalemate, giving Sadat the ‘victory’ required - Egypt signed a peace deal with Israel in 1979 and ceased to be a confrontation state. For a number of reasons, Syria under Assad was not able to take the same path, and the Golan remains occupied by Israel to this day (they annexed it in the early 80s).



The reasons why the peace talks broke down in 2000 are hotly debated, with figures involved sharply divided over where responsibility lies.

As for Hamas, they were founded in the 80s before peace talks existed, and their growth was somewhat facilitated by the Israelis who welcomed the emergence of a religious rival to the secular PLO.



Hamas “took power” in Gaza after winning parliamentary elections, entering into a kind of power-sharing arrangement with Fatah which quickly broke down, and then defeating a US-backed attempt by Fatah to oust them. So to describe their Palestinian opponents as “democratic” in this context is bollox, whatever the valid reasons for the opposition to Hamas of the various brokers involved.


Many thanks as well.
 
So those are actually mossad agents posing as victim?
I’m saying I don’t know who they are. It doesn’t even look like the right BBC font or colour on the news article for starters. Could be anything, and I doubt if it’s from Israeli led propaganda that it’s anything legit.
 
How can anyone with a functioning normal human being brain cant say the Israeli/zoinist lobby in the USA do not control/have powerful effect on the media? Bury your heads in sand.

Those are two separate things. And the notion of control I absolutely would avoid talking about or claiming, given the history of that phrase and how it has been used, as well as the lack of evidentiary support.

Also, if there were no evangelical Christians in the United States, there would not be this level of support for Israel and its actions.

It is all very well having a PR system as part of your foreign policy - Israel does it, along with every other country on the planet - there needs to be a willing audience to receive the message. That's why China and Russia's media campaigns, despite them spending much more than Israel on all these types of activities, only really receives acceptance amongst fringe elements of American society.
 


This is heartbreaking.

the IDF and Israel police are arresting as many youths right now, including Israeli Arabs who they deemed were ‘protesting’. They’re saying up to 500 have been arrested in the last 48 hours.
 
Pallywood is Israeli led propaganda. Do you have anything more objective that can be used as evidence of the above?

Safe to say, nearly every social media post about violence and death in this thread are propaganda designed to influence public opinion in one direction or another.
 


This is heartbreaking.

the IDF and Israel police are arresting as many youths right now, including Israeli Arabs who they deemed were ‘protesting’. They’re saying up to 500 have been arrested in the last 48 hours.


Synagogues burned, riots, people hurt and killed. All participants - Jews and Arabs are rightly getting arrested.
So whats your point?
 
Safe to say, nearly every social media post about violence and death in this thread are propaganda designed to influence public opinion in one direction or another.
What? How? If there’s a video of a building being destroyed it’s not propaganda. It’s a video of a building being destroyed. If there’s a video of ‘Palestine fake funeral’ doing the rounds on social media by pro Israeli Twitter accounts it’s propaganda. The two aren’t even remotely the same.
 
What? How? If there’s a video of a building being destroyed it’s not propaganda. It’s a video of a building being destroyed. If there’s a video of ‘Palestine fake funeral’ doing the rounds on social media by pro Israeli Twitter accounts it’s propaganda. The two aren’t even remotely the same.

 
Synagogues burned, riots, people hurt and killed. All participants - Jews and Arabs are rightly getting arrested.
So whats your point?
Here he is, fresh from the hasbara refresher course. Where’s the customary YouTube link?
 
What? How? If there’s a video of a building being destroyed it’s not propaganda. It’s a video of a building being destroyed. If there’s a video of ‘Palestine fake funeral’ doing the rounds on social media by pro Israeli Twitter accounts it’s propaganda. The two aren’t even remotely the same.

It doesn't have to be untrue to be propaganda. It just has to be curated in a one sided way to appeal to groups who largely already agree with one another.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't have to be untrue to be propaganda. It just has to be curated in a one sided way to appeal to groups who largely already agree with one another.

Wow, I hope people say that to BLM, Hong Kong protestors or even the Belarus journalist. It's all propaganda.
 
Wow, I hope people say that to BLM, Hong Kong protestors or even the Belarus journalist. It's all propaganda.

You wouldn't say it to them because they are actual participants in events on the ground, not remote bystanders half way around the world posting provocative social media links to people who already agree with them.
 
You wouldn't say it to them because they are actual participants in events on the ground, not remote bystanders half way around the world posting provocative social media links to people who already agree with them.
You are a strange person.
 
You wouldn't say it to them because they are actual participants in events on the ground, not remote bystanders half way around the world posting provocative social media links to people who already agree with them.
That's called spreading awareness, no?
 
News spreads awareness. Propaganda spreads influence.
But the bombing of tower blocks and killing of children is news. The photos released during the Vietnam war that showcased the brutality were news but it influenced the American population into a massive anti war movement. Propaganda for me has to be one sided and/or false, which describes exactly what the MSM have been up to, these social media posts are pushing back against a false narrative.
 
But the bombing of tower blocks and killing of children is news. The photos released during the Vietnam war that showcased the brutality were news but it influenced the American population into a massive anti war movement. Propaganda for me has to be one sided and/or false, which describes exactly what the MSM have been up to, these social media posts are pushing back against a false narrative.

I agree with this. The trouble is, a vast majority of the information is one sided and intended to influence audiences to conform to a particular view of the conflict.
 
I agree with this. The trouble is, a vast majority of the information is one sided and intended to influence audiences to conform to a particular view of the conflict.
The problem I see with calling these social media posts propaganda is that they're actively fighting propaganda. If it weren't for them, we'd have to rely on the media narrative, which would not bode well for the Palestinians. I understand what you're saying but I see these guys as whistleblowers more than propagandists.
 
But the bombing of tower blocks and killing of children is news. The photos released during the Vietnam war that showcased the brutality were news but it influenced the American population into a massive anti war movement. Propaganda for me has to be one sided and/or false, which describes exactly what the MSM have been up to, these social media posts are pushing back against a false narrative.

Its not just what you tell people. Its how you tell people. Propaganda doesnt have to false. It can just be selective. Like if there was a battle and 200 Palestinians died and 3 Israelis died the headline "over 200 people were killed today in the fighting between Israeli and Palestinian forces." is a factually correct statement. But it presents itself as there was a comparable amount of loss on both sides which is factually incorrect. So if you hear that people are dying on both sides, you think it must be a fair fight then, right?